Breve actualización del Acer Aspire E15 ES1-511-C50C
|
iluminación: 80 %
Brillo con batería: 188 cd/m²
Contraste: 479:1 (Negro: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.61
Acer Aspire E15 ES1-511-C50C HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2930, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX | Packard Bell Easynote TF71BM-C8R1 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2830, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Asus X551MAV-SX391B HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2830, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Lenovo B50-30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2815, Seagate Momentus Thin 320 GB ST320LT012 | Acer Aspire E1-532 HD Graphics (Haswell), 2955U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 0% | -25% | -22% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 54.4 | 53.7 -1% | 54.2 0% | 40.67 -25% | 42.77 -21% |
sRGB Coverage | 81.9 | 80.6 -2% | 81.6 0% | 61.1 -25% | 63.4 -23% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 56.2 | 55.4 -1% | 56 0% | 42.05 -25% | 44.24 -21% |
Screen | 5% | -1% | -14% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 187 | 197 5% | 221 18% | 201 7% | 239 28% |
Brightness | 169 | 177 5% | 203 20% | 200 18% | 218 29% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 80 0% | 85 6% | 86 8% | 85 6% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.37 5% | 0.75 -92% | 0.6 -54% | 0.55 -41% |
Contrast | 479 | 532 11% | 295 -38% | 335 -30% | 435 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.73 | 8.93 8% | 5.61 42% | 12.23 -26% | 7.57 22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.95 | 10.03 8% | 6.55 40% | 12.29 -12% | 8.82 19% |
Gamma | 2.61 84% | 2.62 84% | 2.79 79% | 2.16 102% | 2.63 84% |
CCT | 12639 51% | 11850 55% | 8018 81% | 14912 44% | 10317 63% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 52 | 51 -2% | 52 0% | 38.91 -25% | 41.3 -21% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 2% /
3% | -1% /
-0% | -20% /
-17% | -9% /
-3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1303 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1190 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1306 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 (ordenar por valor) | |
Acer Aspire E15 ES1-511-C50C | |
Asus X551MAV-SX391B | |
Packard Bell Easynote TF71BM-C8R1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-45 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 259 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 18953 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 1467 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 15.9 | 8.2 | 5.2 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 32.8 / 32.8 / 33 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33.2 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 36.8 / dB(A) |
Carga |
| 35.1 / 37.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distancia) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-6.6 °C / -11.9 F).
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.2 / 8.6 / 8.8 Watt |
Carga |
16.1 / 18.9 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
El veredicto del Aspire E 15 ES1-511-C50C es prácticamente idéntico al del idéntico Packard Bell EasyNote TF71BM-C8R1: Ninguno de los dos ordenadores cuesta mucho. Son aptos para la oficina, internet y ver vídeos y tienen buenísimas duraciones de batería. Además, vienen con teclados decentes y displays mates, pero oscuros. Al menos, los contrastes son decentes. La principal diferencia entre ambos está en los procesadores. Los usuarios que requieran rendimiento multihilo deberían elegir el Aspire, ya que trae un procesador quad-core.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.