Breve análisis del Convertible Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dell P/N 6FR8F tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 386 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 356.8 cd/m²iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 386 cd/m²
Contraste: 965:1 (Negro: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 1920x1080 IPS glare | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix 1920x1080 IPS glare | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 2160x1440 IPS glare | HP Pro X2 410 G1 1366x768 IPS glare | Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 1920x1080 IPS matt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 46.12 | 63.6 | 46.17 | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 67.8 | 88.8 | 65.2 | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 47.79 | 65.6 | 48 | ||
| Screen | 10% | -3% | -10% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 386 | 389 1% | 355.3 -8% | 380 -2% | 331.1 -14% |
| Brightness | 357 | 371 4% | 338 -5% | 362 1% | 315 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 89 6% | 91 8% | 79 -6% | 70 -17% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.41 -3% | 0.33 17% | 0.67 -68% | 0.511 -28% |
| Contrast | 965 | 949 -2% | 1077 12% | 567 -41% | 648 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.71 | 3.12 16% | 4.72 -27% | 4.17 -12% | 14.29 -285% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.79 48% | 6.53 -21% | 2.35 56% | 3.03 44% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.35 94% | 1.96 112% | |
| CCT | 6666 98% | 6707 97% | 6883 94% | 6525 100% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.37 | 44 | |||
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 10% /
10% | -3% /
-3% | -10% /
-10% | -49% /
-49% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| Storage Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L | HP Pro X2 410 G1 HD Graphics 4200, 4202Y, Sandisk X110 SD6SN1M-256G-1006 | Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 HD Graphics 4200, 4610Y, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Lite-On IT L8T-128L6G-HP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 7 | -1% | 13% | 9% | 23% | 2% | |
| Score | 4135 | 4669 13% | 4095 -1% | 4973 20% | 5066 23% | 4131 0% |
| Productivity | 1913 | 2210 16% | 3344 75% | 2455 28% | 2500 31% | |
| Creativity | 7755 | 3241 -58% | 7560 -3% | 3564 -54% | 7503 -3% | |
| Computation | 11986 | 14545 21% | 10851 -9% | 17586 47% | 9390 -22% | |
| System Storage | 5011 | 5167 3% | 5204 4% | 5313 6% | 5331 6% | |
| PCMark 8 | -0% | 4% | ||||
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2480 | 2282 -8% | 2394 -3% | |||
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3291 | 3441 5% | 3711 13% | |||
| Storage Score | 4841 | 4939 2% | 4927 2% | |||
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -1% /
-1% | 13% /
13% | 5% /
6% | 23% /
23% | 3% /
3% |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4135 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2480 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3291 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 Sandisk X110 M.2 | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix Intel SSD 525 Series | HP Pro X2 410 G1 Sandisk X110 | Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 Samsung PM851 Series | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Hynix HFS128G3MNM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 25% | 60% | 68% | 61% | |
| Read Seq | 395.6 | 447 13% | 499.3 26% | 522 32% | 501 27% |
| Write Seq | 221.9 | 260.2 17% | 426.3 92% | 263.2 19% | 324 46% |
| Read 512 | 209.1 | 362.1 73% | 286.3 37% | 423.8 103% | 357.8 71% |
| Write 512 | 153.5 | 253.8 65% | 371 142% | 263.5 72% | 324.6 111% |
| Read 4k | 22.9 | 18.54 -19% | 30.78 34% | 36.08 58% | 20.81 -9% |
| Write 4k | 35.29 | 42.34 20% | 70.4 99% | 93.6 165% | 76.2 116% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 256.4 | 222.6 -13% | 313.2 22% | 390.9 52% | 345 35% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 156.1 | 219.4 41% | 202.4 30% | 228.1 46% | 294.4 89% |
| AS SSD | -0% | 66% | 54% | ||
| Seq Read | 405.4 | 466.4 15% | 512 26% | 493.7 22% | |
| Seq Write | 134.7 | 249.2 85% | 250.3 86% | 303 125% | |
| 4K Read | 19.3 | 17.81 -8% | 32.51 68% | 22 14% | |
| 4K Write | 33.22 | 37.3 12% | 84.4 154% | 73.7 122% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 242 | 221.4 -9% | 371.5 54% | 358.3 48% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 152.5 | 217.1 42% | 220.9 45% | 215 41% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.16 | 0.193 -21% | 0.071 56% | 0.087 46% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.104 | 0.276 -165% | 0.039 62% | 0.075 28% | |
| Score Read | 302 | 286 -5% | 455 51% | 430 42% | |
| Score Write | 199 | 279 40% | 330 66% | 319 60% | |
| Score Total | 648 | 706 9% | 1016 57% | 965 49% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 13% /
10% | 60% /
60% | 67% /
67% | 58% /
57% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G
Sequential Read:
395.6 MB/s
Sequential Write:
221.9 MB/s
512K Read:
209.1 MB/s
512K Write:
153.5 MB/s
4K Read:
22.9 MB/s
4K Write:
35.29 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
256.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
156.1 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 883 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 38912 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3484 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 466 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Risen | |
| 800x600 all off/low AF:0x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 11 Pro 128GB HDD-Dock | |
| Toshiba Satellite U50t-A-100 | |
| 1024x768 all on/med AF:2x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 11 Pro 128GB HDD-Dock | |
| Toshiba Satellite U50t-A-100 | |
| Sleeping Dogs - 1024x768 Low Preset AA:Normal (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Sony Vaio Duo 13 SVD1321M2E | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U574 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor - 1280x720 Lowest Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 11 Pro 128GB HDD-Dock | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U574 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risen (2009) | 60 | 22.7 | 16 | |
| Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 21.3 | 14.1 | 7.1 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 16.65 | 9.27 | 5 |
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L | HP Pro X2 410 G1 HD Graphics 4200, 4202Y, Sandisk X110 SD6SN1M-256G-1006 | Toshiba Portege Z10t-A2111 HD Graphics 4200, 4610Y, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Lite-On IT L8T-128L6G-HP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -23% | 6% | -2% | -4% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.3 | 55.7 -20% | 38.6 17% | 39.8 14% | 45.2 2% | 42.6 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 67.1 -43% | 41.5 12% | 39.4 16% | 46.4 1% | 40.2 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.6 | 35 -14% | 33.3 -9% | 38.6 -26% | 35.2 -15% | 30.4 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.3 | 37.7 -13% | 31.6 5% | 36.6 -10% | 34.4 -3% | 31.8 5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-8.4 °C / -15.1 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-8.4 °C / -15.1 F).
| Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L | HP Pro X2 410 G1 HD Graphics 4200, 4202Y, Sandisk X110 SD6SN1M-256G-1006 | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Lite-On IT L8T-128L6G-HP | Toshiba Portege Z10t HD Graphics 4000, 3339Y, Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -120% | -19% | -11% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2 | 7.9 -295% | 4.1 -105% | 2.1 -5% | 5.2 -160% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 10.3 -75% | 7.4 -25% | 4.4 25% | 6.8 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 11.5 -85% | 7.4 -19% | 4.6 26% | 8.6 -39% |
| Load Average * | 19.1 | 29.2 -53% | 13.5 29% | 24.7 -29% | 20.8 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 18.2 | 34.6 -90% | 13.2 27% | 31.1 -71% | 24.5 -35% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Consumo de corriente
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2 / 5.9 / 6.2 Watt |
| Carga |
19.1 / 18.2 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 960 | |
¿Bueno se vuelve mejor? Mientras que el Dell Venue 11 Pro 7130 (Haswell i5) fue casi penalizado con una valoración del 78% en el sector tablet, la actualización a Venue 11 Pro 7140 Broadwell (Core M-5Y10a) cosecha más puntos. Lo probamos como convertible junto con su teclado anclable, lo que creemos hace justicia al dispositivo de 10.8".
Dell quería crear un útil dispositivo Windows de oficina, y logró su objetivo. La larga duración de batería junto con su buen rendimiento de cálculo, opciones de mantenimiento, amplios accesorios de productividad, decente cámara, funcionamiento silencioso y muy buena pantalla IPS Full HD. El único punto realmente criticable es el teclado, que tiene un punto de presión indefinido.
En la intro preguntamos: Venue 11 Pro (7140) con desplazamiento de teclado: ¿Hará el tablet Broadwell que los subportátiles sean supérfluos? De hecho este es el caso. Podemos premiar al Venue 11 Pro con una puntuación sobresaliente (en comparación con subportátiles y tablets Haswell). El pequeño tablet basado en la arquitectura sin ventilador Broadwell cosechó puntuaciones que a menudo pueden competir con los mejores tablets Haswell del pasado reciente. Dell tiene todos los accesorios pensables que predestinan al Venue 11 Pro a ser el único PC para el trabajo diario con diferentes teclados, un atril para tablets (soporta dos monitores), y digitalizador.
Los competidores en la horquilla de precio entre 770 y 1000 Euros tienen todos menor aguante. La construcción del Toshiba Portégé Z10t no es tan buena, pero su teclado es superior. Como el Toshiba, el HP Pro X2 410 G1 tiene un buen teclado y a pesar de ser Haswell la ventilación es pasiva. Nos quejamos del escaso ángulo de apertura de la pantalla. La Surface Pro 3 tiene la mejor construcción, pero no tenemos claro que los usuarios business quieran tener que acostumbrarse a las teclas apretadas de la Type 2 Cover. Sin embargo, el tester dio a los dispositivos de entrada del Surface Pro la mejor valoración. El atril integrado también permite un ángulo de apertura más agradable y plano para mecanografiar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
