Breve análisis del Convertible Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F11AN1L2ES
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panasonic MEI96A2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 458 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 439.2 cd/m²iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 202 cd/m²
Contraste: 788:1 (Negro: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 3.81
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2920, Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 HD Graphics 4000, 3437U, Samsung MZ7PC128HBFU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | -29% | -26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 46.12 -25% | 42.08 -32% | 43.9 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.9 | 67.8 -20% | 62.6 -26% | 65.8 -22% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.5 | 47.79 -22% | 43.61 -29% | 45.37 -26% |
| Screen | 21% | 5% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 449 | 389 -13% | 404 -10% | 434 -3% |
| Brightness | 439 | 371 -15% | 367 -16% | 414 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 89 1% | 85 -3% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.41 28% | 0.52 9% | 0.6 -5% |
| Contrast | 788 | 949 20% | 777 -1% | 723 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.24 | 3.12 62% | 4 51% | 4.84 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.32 | 2.79 62% | 4 45% | 3.69 50% |
| Gamma | 3.81 58% | 2 110% | 2.6 85% | |
| CCT | 6717 97% | 6076 107% | 6547 99% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.5 | 40 -35% | 42 -32% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -1% /
8% | -12% /
-4% | -11% /
-3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES | |
| Acer Aspire P3-171-3322Y2G06as | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11S | |
| Acer W700-53334G12as | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES | |
| Acer Aspire P3-171-3322Y2G06as | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11S | |
| Acer W700-53334G12as | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES | |
| Acer Aspire P3-171-3322Y2G06as | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11S | |
| Acer W700-53334G12as | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES | |
| Acer Aspire P3-171-3322Y2G06as | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 11S | |
| Acer W700-53334G12as | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE | |
| PCMark Vantage Result | 5089 puntos | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2839 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | 1546 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated | 1366 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated | 2445 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 7 | ||||
| Score | 2839 | 5162 82% | 4669 64% | 4417 56% |
| PCMark 8 | 103% | 77% | ||
| Home Score Accelerated | 1546 | 3253 110% | 2700 75% | |
| Creative Score Accelerated | 1366 | 2933 115% | 2333 71% | |
| Work Score Accelerated | 2445 | 4501 84% | 4513 85% | |
| PCMark Vantage | ||||
| 1024x768 Result | 5089 | 11992 136% | 12636 148% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 93% /
98% | 100% /
100% | 94% /
87% |
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO
Sequential Read:
271.9 MB/s
Sequential Write:
123.1 MB/s
512K Read:
256.6 MB/s
512K Write:
123 MB/s
4K Read:
24.19 MB/s
4K Write:
40.54 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
87.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
78 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 2151 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 254 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World of Warcraft (2005) | 46.2 | 25.3 | 13.5 | 5.6 |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 11.7 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 0.3 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 10.9 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.2 / 45.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distancia) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.7 °C / 1.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.7 °C / 1.3 F).
Consumo de corriente
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.1 / 6.1 / 8.3 Watt |
| Carga |
15.5 / 20.6 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Sony VAIO Fit 11A multi-flip SVF11AN1L2ES HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N2920, Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO | Lenovo ThinkPad Helix HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 20CD0038GE HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | HP EliteBook Revolve 810 HD Graphics 4000, 3437U, Samsung MZ7PC128HBFU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 65% | 31% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 506 | 559 10% | 458 -9% | |
| WiFi | 284 | 438 54% | 372 31% | 315 11% |
| Load | 87 | 200 130% | 124 43% |
El Vaio Fit 11A multi-flip deja claro por qué echaremos de menos los portátiles de Sony. Los ingenieros japoneses siempre logran sorprendernos, sin importar si es con una inusual pantalla giratoria o un diseño descarado. Los altavoces de potente sonido en los laterales y el oculto control de volumen en la trasera también nos asombraron. El genial paquete software y el rendimiento de procesador adecuado para la rutina también son atractivos. Y, y, y... muchos detalles grandes y pequeños del convertible de Sony resultan atractivos.
Pero hay tantos detalles grandes y pequeños que frustran una valoración partiularmente buena. ¿Por qué el control de volumen está situado exactamente dónde sólo puede ser usado en un modo?¿Por qué esta rigidez insatisfactoria?¿Por qué no hay opciones de mantenimiento? La batería demasiado débil y la reducción de brillo de pantalla en batería también entran aquí.
Así, el Sony Vaio Fit 11A multi-flip es definitivamente digno de darle un segundo vistazo cuando se busca un convertible delgado con una versión completa de Windows para la oficina. Tendrá que aceptar, eso sí, los defectos antes mencionados. EL Acer Iconia W700 de la gama doméstica ofrece una duración de batería considerablemente superior. Los usuarios que necesiten características de seguridad las encontrarán en el Lenovo ThinkPad Helix, que también ofrece mayor duración de batería y más rendimiento.
