Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del portátil Asus F550LN-CN89H
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HTN03.6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 178 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 166.4 cd/m²iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 178 cd/m²
Contraste: 434:1 (Negro: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.82% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Asus F550LN-CN89H GeForce 840M, 4500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 GeForce GT 740M, 4200M, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Acer Aspire V5-561G Radeon R7 M265, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Asus N56JR-S4080H GeForce GTX 760M, 4700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii GeForce GT 750M, 4200U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 23% | 17% | 42% | 52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.82 | 50.8 24% | 48.35 18% | 58.1 42% | 64.1 57% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.2 | 74.4 22% | 69.8 14% | 86.2 41% | 89 45% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.2 | 52.5 24% | 49.65 18% | 59.9 42% | 64.6 53% |
| Screen | -36% | -67% | 26% | 42% | |
| Brightness middle | 178 | 317 78% | 300 69% | 375 111% | 287 61% |
| Brightness | 166 | 295 78% | 280 69% | 341 105% | 278 67% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 73 -10% | 85 5% | 76 -6% | 77 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.97 -137% | 1.27 -210% | 0.58 -41% | 0.24 41% |
| Contrast | 434 | 327 -25% | 236 -46% | 647 49% | 1196 176% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.36 | 8.52 -95% | 10.93 -151% | 4.14 5% | 4.8 -10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.35 | 10.06 -200% | 12.96 -287% | 5.25 -57% | 5 -49% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.51 88% | 2.39 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.7 81% |
| CCT | 6991 93% | 10564 62% | 11591 56% | 5699 114% | 6360 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 48.76 25% | 45.3 16% | 56.6 45% | 61 56% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -7% /
-20% | -25% /
-44% | 34% /
31% | 47% /
45% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| HP Compaq 15-a024sg | |
| Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii | |
| Acer Aspire V5-561G | |
| Dell Inspiron 15R-5537 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 | |
| Asus N56JR-S4080H | |
| Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| HP Compaq 15-a024sg | |
| Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii | |
| Acer Aspire V5-561G | |
| Dell Inspiron 15R-5537 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 | |
| Asus N56JR-S4080H | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2909 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2844 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3303 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3463 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| HP Compaq 15-a024sg | |
| Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii | |
| Acer Aspire V5-561G | |
| Dell Inspiron 15R-5537 | |
| Asus N56JR-S4080H | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 | |
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Tasa de Transferencia Mínima:
44.5 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Máxima:
111.7 MB/s
Tasa de Transferencia Promedio:
82 MB/s
Tiempo de Acceso:
17.3 ms
Velocidad de Ráfagas:
283.6 MB/s
Uso de CPU:
3.6 %
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10332 puntos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 7191 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2385 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46736 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5816 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1334 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H | |
| HP Compaq 15-a024sg | |
| Acer Aspire V5-561G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15R-5537 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii | |
| Asus N56JR-S4080H | |
| Asus N56JR-S4080H | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010) | 75.3 | 55.9 | 23.6 | |
| Civilization 5 (2010) | 60.8 | 16.1 | ||
| Total War: Shogun 2 (2011) | 115 | 40 | 17.4 | |
| Batman: Arkham City (2011) | 49 | 36 | ||
| Mass Effect 3 (2012) | 36.7 | 21.4 | ||
| Risen 2: Dark Waters (2012) | 42.2 | 28 | 22.4 | |
| Max Payne 3 (2012) | 45.8 | 30.1 | ||
| Ghost Recon: Future Soldier (2012) | 40.8 | 17.6 | ||
| Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 58.9 | 28.9 | ||
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 79.6 | 45.5 | ||
| Medal of Honor: Warfighter (2012) | 41.2 | 35.1 | ||
| Need for Speed: Most Wanted (2012) | 42 | 30.3 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed III (2012) | 42.3 | 38.2 | ||
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 125.3 | 58.8 | 29.2 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 83.4 | 47.5 | 38.4 | 13.4 |
| Thief (2014) | 32.7 | 21.3 | 17.1 |
| Asus F550LN-CN89H GeForce 840M, 4500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Acer Aspire V5-561G Radeon R7 M265, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 GeForce GT 740M, 4200M, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Acer Aspire V5-573G-54208G50aii GeForce GT 750M, 4200U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT0 12-9WS142 | Asus N56JR-S4080H GeForce GTX 760M, 4700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider | -13% | -18% | 14% | 127% | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset | 125.3 | 95.2 -24% | 97 -23% | 120.4 -4% | |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x | 58.8 | 45.8 -22% | 47 -20% | 65.4 11% | |
| 1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | 29.2 | 31.5 8% | 25.9 -11% | 39.8 36% | 66.2 127% |
| BioShock Infinite | -15% | 8% | |||
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | 83.4 | 71.8 -14% | 86.1 3% | ||
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | 47.5 | 40 -16% | 51.2 8% | ||
| 1366x768 High Preset | 38.4 | 33.2 -14% | 43.62 14% | ||
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -14% /
-14% | -18% /
-18% | 11% /
11% | 127% /
127% |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.2 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 32 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 36.9 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 41.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distancia) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Consumo de corriente
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 8.4 / 8.4 Watt |
| Carga |
35.4 / 58.7 Watt |
   
| |
El Asus F550LN-CN89H tiene mucho que ofrecer: buen rendimiento con aplicaciones y juegos. Tiene una gran capacidad de almacenamiento y pesar del potente hardware es bastante silencioso y se calienta muy poco. La duración de batería es buena y los buenos dispositivos de entrada, junto con dos años de garantía completan la oferta. La pantalla es decepcionante a pesar de tener resolución FullHD, superficie mate y buenos colores, los malos ángulos de visualización, bajo brillo y bajo contraste lo hacen poco recomendable.
Las ventajas del Acer Aspire V5-561G son su panel Full HD más brillante. Además, es 100 euros más barato que el F550LN, pero tiene peor rendimiento. El Lenovo IdeaPad Z510 usa un panel FHD más brillante y está equipado con el procesador más potente de los tres. Este modelo está disponible desde 630 euros pero sin sistema operativo Windows.
