Aorus X3 Plus
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Price comparison
Promedio de 5 puntuaciones (de 7 análisis)
Análisis para el Aorus X3 Plus
Origen: Hexus EN→ES Archive.org version
Having arrived on the scene with the eye-catching X7 back in January 2014, the Gigabyte subsidiary has been quick to follow up with the smaller X3 and the soon-to-be-released X5. Keeping up with the latest developments in PC graphics, Aorus has refreshed its 13.9in laptop with a GeForce GTX 970M GPU that delivers the best mobile gaming experience we've seen on a system of this size.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 02/12/2015
Origen: Digital Versus EN→ES Archive.org version
Despite an impressive spec sheet, the X3 Plus is a little disappointing: it needs a much better a cooling system, and it produces far too much noise. On top of that, although its general characteristics are pretty decent, the screen's impressive native resolution just isn't usable. Seems like they got a bit carried away...
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 01/16/2015
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60% rendimiento: 100% características: 60% movilidad: 60%
Origen: Tech Advisor EN→ES Archive.org version
The Aorus X3 Plus works well as a portable games station, providing fast framerates with modern games at high details settings. Its high-resolution screen is less obviously useful for its gaming role as fewer games may benefit from its high 262 ppi pixel density, and the Windows platform does not support absurdly high resolution displays well. When it does work you're rewarded with a pin-sharp image but remember that for gaming there's arguably little need to exceed 2560 or even 1920 screen pixel widths. Overall there's definite room for improvement by its maker but the X3 Plus should prove popular with Windows gamers looking to combine performance and portability.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 11/07/2014
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 70% rendimiento: 90% características: 90% procesamiento: 80%
Origen: Expert Reviews EN→ES Archive.org version
The Aorus X3 Plus is a technically brilliant laptop with a great screen and superb performance. It's one of the most desirable laptops we've seen in 2014. If you don't have the money to spend on the X3 Plus, you should look at the £899 Chillblast Defiant 2 Mini (Reviews, Shopper 320). It has good mid-range gaming performance and a relatively attractive chassis, and is much cheaper.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 09/25/2014
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 100%
Origen: Ultrabook Review EN→ES Archive.org version
As far as the laptop goes, it’s certainly going back because of the Wifi issue and the gap in the lid. I will be hard pressed to replace it with another though unless I find something I really love about it. The keyboard flex and the lid flex(which causes the screen flicker) are reasons enough for me to stay away. This is a really expensive machine to have to treat it so delicately. On the positive side, the laptop is extremely lightweight and powerful – something no other laptop except the Razer Blade can claim. The Aorus X3+ is about $550 cheaper than the Razer blade with 512GB of storage, so maybe average build quality is something that could be tolerated in order to save some money.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/14/2014
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: Trusted Reviews EN→ES Archive.org version
Small gaming laptops have been improving, and Gigabyte has made a step forward with the X3: it’s slimmer and lighter than anything else we’ve seen while including power levels that’ll match many larger notebooks. It doesn’t just impress with its benchmark scores. Its battery life is reasonable, and the screen has impressive quality – even if we’re not keen on its high resolution, which doesn’t work well when gaming or working. The keyboard is middling, but it’s no worse than many other laptops.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/10/2014
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 80% rendimiento: 100% pantalla: 80% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 80%
Origen: Hexus EN→ES Archive.org version
Having set the stage with the powerful X7 back in January this year, Aorus has now taken the opportunity to deliver a smaller alternative designed with portability in mind. Priced at £1,549, the 13.9in X3 Plus has been worth the wait and for the most part exceeds our expectations of a modern-day gaming laptop.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 08/20/2014
Comentario
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M:
Tarjeta de video de gama alta de la serie GeForce GTX 800M.
Estas tarjetas también deben ser capaces de aguantar todos los juegos actuales, pero la mayoría de ellos en configuraciones de detalles medios y bajos y con bajas resoluciones. Juegos más antiguos, o menos exigentes todavía pueden ser jugados con buena calidad de gráficos.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
4860HQ: Un procesador quad-core basado en Haswell con frecuencia de 2,4 GHz con Turbo Boost hasta 3,6 GHz. Ofrece una GPU integrada Iris Pro Graphics 5200 y un controlador de memoria DDR3 de dos canales.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
14.00": Sobretodo, este tamaño de pantalla es usado para subportátiles, ultrabooks y convertibles. Para los tres tipos, este tamaño es bastante grande. La mayor variedad de subportátiles es representada con este tamaño.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
1.9 kg: Normalmente subportátiles, ultrabooks y portátiles muy livianos con diagonales de pantalla de 12-16 pulgadas pesan así.
78%: Esta evaluación no es convincente. Debe ser considerado que difícilmente existen portátiles que reciben una evaluación abajo de 60%. Esta portátil es evaluada abajo del promedio, esta realmente no es una recomendación para la compra.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.