Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Price comparison
Promedio de 22 puntuaciones (de 31 análisis)
Análisis para el Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04
Origen: Ingame EN→ES Archive.org version
Die „neue“ Version des Apple MacBook Pro 13“ ist eine runde Sache und mit Abstrichen eignet sich das MacBook auch zum Spielen. Dabei trübt nicht die Hardware den Gesamteindruck, sondern die Außentemperatur des Gerätes und die Lautstärke des Lüfters. Ein weiterer Punkt ist, dass das weiße MacBook technisch identisch mit dem MacBook Pro ist, jedoch einen knapp 200€ günstigeren Preis hat.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 11/01/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 70% procesamiento: 90% ergonomía: 90%
Origen: AnandTech EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple products tend to be tough to give a conclusion on. There’s the style factor, the (lack of) value factor, the fanboy factor, the OS X factor (for Macs), etc. Macs are divisive products—the people who use them love them, but for every person that loves a Mac there’s two more that wish all things Apple would burn in hell. So lets start with the easier part of the conclusion: if you need an OS X portable and think the MBP15 is too large, the 13” MacBook Pro is the one to get.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 10/14/2010
Puntuación: precio: 80% pantalla: 80%
Origen: Comp Reviews EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple's 2010 revision of the MacBook Pro 13 falls short of what the company did for its larger siblings. Performance lags behind because of the dated Core 2 Duo processor. It only makes sense to get this current model if you need the long battery life in a compact form that includes an optical drive and durable design. The price is a bit high for the performance and I would really recommend holding off until Apple finally brings the Core i3 processor to it.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 09/08/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: Tech Advisor EN→ES Archive.org version
You can save half a kilo on the 15in version with the 13in Apple MacBook Pro, although last season's CPU and integrated graphics means you lose the faster performance. Yet the baby MacBook Pro still offers build quality, attention to detail and software unmatched by comparable Windows notebooks.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 08/26/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 70% características: 80% procesamiento: 90%
Origen: PC Perspective EN→ES Archive.org version
The MacBook is a powerful laptop for its size, both in terms of processing power and graphics power. The RAM is a bummer, but generally not a deal-breaker. The MacBook is more expensive than most PC laptops of similar size, but it should be. Most 13.3 inch PC laptops are inferior in performance, display quality and overall build quality. Those few that are similar to the MacBook in these categories are typically no less expensive.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 08/25/2010
Puntuación: precio: 70%
Origen: Techradar EN→ES Archive.org version
The mid-2010 13-inch MacBook Pro refresh represents a welcome upgrade for Apple's entry-level MacBook Pros, but retaining the Intel Core 2 Duo processors (for whatever reason) makes it a little underwhelming. We hope the dispute that kept the Core i-series chips out of this revision is quickly resolved, so the entire MacBook Pro range can leave behind the Core 2 Duos with the next release.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 06/10/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: Channel Web EN→ES Archive.org version
The lower end of the Macbook range gets a boost. While the top-end of Apple’s current line-up of laptop models uses Intel’s latest Core i5 and i7 processors, this model, the two 13in models instead use the older and less powerful Core 2 Duo chip. Very pleasant to use, but not quite cheap enough or powerful enough to be good value.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/30/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: Computer Active EN→ES Archive.org version
The lower end of the Macbook range gets a boost. While the top-end of Apple’s current line-up of laptop models uses Intel’s latest Core i5 and i7 processors, this model, the two 13in models instead use the older and less powerful Core 2 Duo chip. Very pleasant to use, but not quite cheap enough or powerful enough to be good value
60
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/30/2010
Origen: Laptop Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
Thanks to its stellar industrial design, superior ergonomics, and above-average performance and battery life, the 13-inch MacBook ($999) is a compelling buy. Both price- and performance-wise, this notebook falls between Windows-based competitors like the ASUS U30Jc ($899) and Lenovo IdeaPad Y460 ($1,049), but beats both in terms of endurance. The main question is whether you’ll want to spend an extra $200 on the 13-inch MacBook Pro, which has an SD Card slot, backlit keyboard, more RAM, and a sleeker aluminum chassis. If you can live without these amenities, the new MacBook is a very good value.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/26/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Mobile Tech Review EN→ES Archive.org version
If you want Mac OS (and we can't blame you), and are on a budget, the MacBook is Apple's most affordable notebook. It's attractive, has a colorful and bright LED backlit display that's a great improvement over pre-unibody MacBook models and the updated graphics give the machine enough punch for light gaming. It's a fast and responsive machine whether running Windows 7 or Mac OS X, and the multi-touch trackpad is superb. If you're not wed to Mac OS, there are certainly compelling Windows laptops in the same price range with better specs, but few have the Mac's build quality. We do live in terror of the pure white finish that's scratchable and can stain. If you're rough on your computers, the MacBook unibody won't likely stay glossy and pretty for long. It is fairly impervious to dents and it is easy to wipe and clean though. Still, we wish Apple would find a way to toughen up the finish or move on to another one altogether (old black macbook, we miss you). Our advice? If you can afford $200 more, get the 13" MacBook Pro. You get so much more for that small sum including a durable metal casing, twice the RAM, a backlit keyboard, FireWire 800 and an SD card slot. Heck, upgrading the MacBook the RAM to 4 gigs alone will cost your around $120. The only drawback with the Pro version is the heat transfer through the bottom and to your lap-- it gets very hot while the non-Pro model stays cool.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/20/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: PC Pro EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple fans will be enraptured, but poor battery life in Windows limits its crossover appeal.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/11/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 83% precio: 67% rendimiento: 67% características: 83%
Origen: PC Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
Updated components are all you'll get with the Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz) ($1,199 direct), but they can be compelling for many. If you bought the MacBook Pro 13-inch ($1,199 direct, ) last year, it isn't worth the upgrade. But if you're new to the MacBook Pro family, this is the ticket to portable computing bliss.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/05/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Slashgear EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple’s recent MacBook Pro update brought a long awaited processor update and new GPU options, but much of the attention was lavished on the larger models in the company’s professional notebook range. In contrast, the 13-inch MacBook Pro saw a more modest refresh; check out the full SlashGear review after the cut.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 04/30/2010
rendimiento: 60%
Origen: It Pro EN→ES Archive.org version
Apple’s new 2.66GHz MacBook Pro sports excellent network connections but it’s not so great if you need to connect a lot of USB peripherals. Unless you genuinely see a need for extra speed and don’t want to step up to a heavier 15in model, you’ll be just as happy with the 2.4GHz model. Put the considerable saving of £250 towards peripherals, an extended warranty or virtualisation software, and also bear in mind that Apple doesn’t bundle any office software even at this price. Otherwise the 13in MacBook Pro’s battery life under light use is an attractive proposition that will see you through the working day.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 04/28/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 83%
Origen: T3 EN→ES Archive.org version
The 13-inch MacBook Pro is a fantastic laptop with better graphics performance than ever, but by opting for the older CPU’s, the 13-inch version isn’t the significant upgrade we wanted. At £1250, it's hard to recommend when you can get the regular 13-inch MacBook for £816, OK it isn't anywhere near as powerful, but is far better value. Alternatively if you stretch your budget to £1500, you can get the excellent 15-inch version instread.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 04/27/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: CNet EN→ES Archive.org version
The 2009 version of the 13-inch MacBook Pro was one of our favorite laptops, providing a great combination of design, performance, and battery life in a thin chassis. The new 13-inch MacBook Pro uses a faster version of last year's processor, but a graphics chip upgrade and better battery life give it more value for the same price.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/26/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 81% rendimiento: 70% características: 80% movilidad: 90%
Origen: Laptop Mag EN→ES Archive.org version
By changing a few key components and optimizing them for its software, Apple has managed to once again drastically improve the 13-inch MacBook Pro. Not only does it perform much better than the previous version, its battery life has seen an impressive boost. If you’re looking to save a little money, the ASUS U30Jc-1A ($899), which has automatic switchable graphics, offers similar performance, but 30 minutes less battery life and a heavier chassis. Overall, though, the $1,199 13-inch MacBook Pro offers the best combination of performance, endurance, design, and smart software.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 04/26/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Tech Advisor EN→ES Archive.org version
If you already have the previous 13in Apple MacBook Pro, there's not a lot of reason to upgrade unless you simply must have the newest version of everything. The changes to the 13in line-up are mostly to do with improved graphics and battery life, and they aren't all that different from the year before - and it's somewhat hard to justify the £1,249 model based only on its larger hard drive and slightly faster processor, which didn't translate to much difference in our tests. To get the most from the new generation of MacBook Pros, you'll need to step up to the larger sizes, which take advantage of the Intel Core i5 and i7 processors and their own graphics improvements.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 04/23/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Computer Shopper EN→ES Archive.org version
At first glance, you may not notice anything different about Apple’s latest line of MacBook Pros, introduced in April 2010. The new models, which feature 13-, 15- and 17-inch screens, sport the same sleek, minimalist design, the same keyboard, and the same touch pad as the previous iteration. Apple takes what was already good and makes it even better, with the inclusion of a slightly better processor, improved graphics, and unbeatable battery life.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/01/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 91%
Origen: ETM Testmagazin - 2/11
Comparación, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 04/01/2011
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 91%
Origen: Chip.de DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 10/12/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 88% precio: 64% rendimiento: 82% características: 100% pantalla: 100% movilidad: 80% ergonomía: 82%
Origen: Chip.de DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 07/14/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 78% precio: 60% rendimiento: 77% características: 81% pantalla: 92% movilidad: 73% ergonomía: 76%
Origen: Notebookcheck DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 07/04/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 88% rendimiento: 84% pantalla: 84% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 98% ergonomía: 94% emisiones: 89%
Origen: Mac Welt DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 05/09/2010
Puntuación: precio: 40% rendimiento: 50% pantalla: 50% movilidad: 80%
Origen: c't - 12/10
Único Análisis, , Mediano, Fecha: 05/01/2010
Puntuación: precio: 80% pantalla: 50% movilidad: 80%
Origen: Notebookforum.at DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 04/28/2010
Puntuación: rendimiento: 80% pantalla: 50% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 90%
Origen: SFT - 4/10
Comparación, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 03/01/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 96%
Origen: Erenumerique FR→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 05/28/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: UPS Special RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 01/06/2011
Origen: NotebookTV.hu HU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 03/29/2010
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 90% precio: 70% rendimiento: 80% pantalla: 100% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 100% ergonomía: 100% emisiones: 80%
Origen: Datormagazin SV→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 11/17/2010
Comentario
NVIDIA GeForce 320M: Tarjeta de video con chip set integrado basada en el núcleo GT216 (por ejemplo, GeForce GT 325M) pero sin memoria dedicada. Soporta procesadores Core 2 Duo.
Estos procesadores gráficos pueden mostrar únicamente juegos antiguos, fluidamente. Juegos actuales pueden ser presentados con detalles sustancialmente reducidos.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
Intel Core 2 Duo: Este es el sucesor Core Duo y el Core Solo con un pipeline más largo y con una velocidad entre 5-20% sin mayor consumo de energía. Adicional al diseño de Core Duo existe un cuarto decodificador, una unidad SSE ampliada y una unidad lógica aritmética (ALU) adicional.
Sus características son: 2 núcleos (cores), una amplificación de comando de 64-bit EM64T y 2 o 4 MB L2 Cache y 291 millones de transistores, que son acabados en 65nm. Mas allá de esto, todos los tipos soportan técnicas "Execute Disable Bit", SSSE3 (SSE4), Enhanced Speedstep, LaGrande y la mayoría de técnicas de virtualizacion (VT) Vanderpool.
El Core 2 Duo para laptops es idéntico a los procesadores Core 2 Duo para desktops, pero los procesadores para notebooks trabajan con tensiones más bajas (0.95 a 1188 Volt) y un Frontside bus clock (1066 contra 667 MHz). El rendimiento de laptops cuena con una frecuencia de 20-25% más baja que PCs Desktop debido a una frecuencia más baja de Frontside bus y los discos duros más lentos.
P8600: CPU rápida pero no cara. Para la mayoria de los juegos y aplicaciones multimedia es suficiente y gracias al TDP de 25 vatios es usable incluso para los portátiles más pequeños.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
13.30": Sobretodo, este tamaño de pantalla es usado para subportátiles, ultrabooks y convertibles. Para los tres tipos, este tamaño es bastante grande. La mayor variedad de subportátiles es representada con este tamaño.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
2.04 kg: Normalmente subportátiles, ultrabooks y portátiles muy livianos con diagonales de pantalla de 12-16 pulgadas pesan así.
79.5%: Esta evaluación no es convincente. Debe ser considerado que difícilmente existen portátiles que reciben una evaluación abajo de 60%. Esta portátil es evaluada abajo del promedio, esta realmente no es una recomendación para la compra.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.