Microsoft Lumia 650
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, gran angular)
Price comparison
Promedio de 18 puntuaciones (de 27 análisis)
Análisis para el Microsoft Lumia 650
Microsoft convencional. El nuevo Lumia 650 de Microsoft quiere convencer a los usuarios con precios competitivos y obviamente el sistema operativo Windows. El fabricante de Redmond apunta a clientes business en particular. Debido al lento hardware, empero, hay ciertas limitaciones, incluyendo la falta de la característica Windows Continuum.
Origen: Techradar EN→ES Archive.org version
The 600 series within the Lumia line-up has always been where the best of budget and premium combine to offer something distinctive. From the 620 through to the 640, these have been popular, powerful devices. The Lumia 650 is a different beast. It's the experience of using this phone that sets it apart. The lovely in-hand feel, the dependable camera, the decent battery life, the surprisingly good speakers and the mostly smooth day-to-day operation are all key to what a good smartphone experience should be.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 04/18/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Phone Arena EN→ES Archive.org version
The Microsoft Lumia 650 provides a mostly adequate experience, making it a solid choice for an entry-level Windows 10 handset. It's nicely put together and handles well. The screen and speaker are of good quality and make for enjoyable multimedia. The hardware is competent enough to ensure smooth basic functionality, though it isn't capable of more than that. For an entry-level phone, the Lumia 650 delivered better photo quality than we expected, but then there's the borderline unusable camcorder.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 04/13/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: Trusted Reviews EN→ES Archive.org version
There’s plenty to like about the Lumia 650. It offers up a great design that makes it look and feel far more expensive than it actually is, and the OLED screen is one of the best I’ve seen on an affordable smartphone. While I’m still not convinced that Windows 10 Mobile is great for general consumers, for business users the Lumia 650 ticks all the right boxes.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/02/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60% precio: 70% rendimiento: 40% pantalla: 70% movilidad: 70% procesamiento: 80%
Origen: GSM Arena EN→ES Archive.org version
In its second generation since going solo, the Microsoft lineup is keeping up the ambition and drive. It's obviously the flagship that sets the tone but the lower ranks do have a purpose in the greater scheme as well. Especially when you consider that Microsoft intends to have a lot fewer devices in its portfolio this time around.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 03/30/2016
Origen: Stuff TV EN→ES Archive.org version
In some ways Microsoft has its upped standards, but only at a surface level. The screen and metal-rimmed design make a great first impression, but the slow performance and water-treading hardware in other areas make it seem less of a smart buy than several Androids around the same price.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 03/23/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: It Pro EN→ES Archive.org version
Without the draw of Windows 10 Continuum, it feels like the Lumia 650 is perpetually on the back foot. It never really makes the most of its new operating system, and there's very little to distinguish it from its Windows Phone 8-based predecessors apart from its metal frame and beautiful OLED display.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 03/09/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: GSM Arena EN→ES Archive.org version
Still, the interface is smooth, apps (people, phone) load quick, scrolling through long lists was a breeze. The camera interface was reasonably snappy too. The browser takes its time to re-render the page as you pan and zoom, though. That's what you get with a low-power chipset and a single gig of RAM.
video review
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 02/23/2016
Origen: Pocket Lint EN→ES Archive.org version
The build quality of the Lumia 650 is decent enough for the money and the screen, despite being 720p, does its job well. There's a heft to the handset that makes it feel strong, like it will last. Limitations to processing power, camera resolution and connectivity really pull the phone down. Yes the price is low at £150, but without Windows 10 Continuum, 4G or 1080p video recording it'll be a no go for some.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 02/22/2016
Origen: PC Pro EN→ES Archive.org version
After first setting eyes on its slim form and understated design, I wanted to like the Microsoft Lumia 650. Its screen is great, the camera isn’t bad and there are plenty of elements of Windows 10 Mobile that I like. But it's completely spoiled by Microsoft's decision to hobble the performance of the phone by shoehorning in a processor so low on power that not even Windows Phone can make it look good.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 02/15/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: Expert Reviews EN→ES Archive.org version
This is such a shame, as this would have been a great Windows phone if only it had a decent processor inside it. Battery life was very respectable at 11h 36m in our continuous video playback test with the screen brightness set to 170cd/m2, and its screen and build quality are practically second to none in its price range. However, when it's so crippled by its bad choice of chipset, the Lumia 650 just can't measure up to its infinitely superior predecessor. If you're looking for a cheap Windows handset, the Lumia 640 is still your best choice, as you can now pick one up for £120 SIM-free or £90 on pre-pay. The only silver lining is that this could be the basis for a great mid-range Windows phone just around the corner.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 02/15/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 40%
Origen: Recombu EN→ES Archive.org version
However, the limited performance and lack of killer features such as Continuum make it difficult to recommend as a business device, especially as the competition from the Android market is very strong. For less money you can grab a Moto G, Wileyfox Swift or Vodafone Prime Ultra, which offer excellent features and dependable performance. And if you’re dead set on Windows, you can still pick up last year’s brilliant Lumia 640 LTE for under £100.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 02/15/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60%
Origen: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 10/01/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 76% movilidad: 67%
Origen: Chip.de DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 07/27/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 64% precio: 82% rendimiento: 68% características: 48% pantalla: 94% movilidad: 53%
Origen: SFT - Heft 8/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 07/01/2016
Origen: PCtipp.ch DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 06/21/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: PocketPC DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/26/2016
Origen: PocketPC DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/25/2016
Origen: Netzwelt DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 04/27/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: Expert Blog DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 04/20/2016
Origen: Curved DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/19/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 77% rendimiento: 75% pantalla: 75% movilidad: 75%
Origen: Computerbild - Heft 08/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 04/15/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 83%
Origen: c't - Heft 09/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 04/15/2016
Origen: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 04/01/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 77%
Origen: c't - Heft 08/2016
Único Análisis, , Longitud Desconocida, Fecha: 04/01/2016
Origen: A1 Blog DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 03/25/2016
Origen: Inside Handy DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 03/09/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 63%
Origen: Teltarif DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 03/09/2016
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 90% características: 90% procesamiento: 93% ergonomía: 84%
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 304:
Muchos juegos son difícilmente ejecutables con estos adaptadores gráficos o se ejecutan de manera muy lenta.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
212 APQ8009:
SoC de gama baja con 4 núcleos ARM Cortex-A7 con máx. 1,3 GHz.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
5.00": Esta es una diagonal típica de smartphones.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
69.02%: Esta evaluación es mala. La mayoría de las portátiles son mejor evaluadas. Esta no es una recomendación para compra.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.