Oppo R9s
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Price comparison
Promedio de 5 puntuaciones (de 17 análisis)
Análisis para el Oppo R9s
Origen: El Confidencial Archive.org version
Además, a diferencia de lo que sucede con algunos ‘smartphones’ chinos, cuenta con idioma español preinstalado en el sistema operativo oficial, por lo que no requiere de parches que pueden provocar un desbarajuste, y viene equipado con la banda LTE 8, de forma que es compatible con todos los operadores de telefonía 4G de España. Eso sí, hay que tener en cuenta que, en caso de sufrir algún percance, el servicio técnico oficial está en China.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 12/07/2016
Análises en otras idiomas
Origen: Ausdroid EN→ES Archive.org version
We’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Comparación, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 05/02/2017
Origen: Hardware Zone EN→ES Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Comparación, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 04/30/2017
Origen: Android Authority EN→ES Archive.org version
The OPPO R9s has an excellent camera, offers impressive battery life, and features a nice display. However, the number of compromises here is staggering. Among derivative design and software, the R9s has sloppy software, offers below average performance, and has a bleak software support outlook. For Western users, the strange display coating, YouTube audio sync issue, and limited availability are even bigger issues to consider.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 03/15/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 82% rendimiento: 80% pantalla: 75% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 80%
Origen: Cybershack EN→ES Archive.org version
Selling for AUD$598 with 64GB of storage, the OPPO R9s is a great deal, but it’s slightly difficult to recommend over the significantly cheaper F1s if you don’t need the extra bells and whistles, such as the better camera or the horsepower. Vanilla Android would push this phone over the edge and make it an easily recommendable device over its competitors, but as it stands you’ll have to weigh up whether you can deal with the slightly odd operating system. If the operating system isn’t a problem, then you’re getting one of the best value-for-money phones on the market.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 02/24/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: Bill Bennett EN→ES Archive.org version
Oppo’s R9s story is all about the price. We don’t know for sure but if it lands in New Zealand at NZ$750 it’ll be competitive. For that money you get most of what you’ll find in premium phones selling for twice the price.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 02/15/2017
Origen: Gadgetguy EN→ES Archive.org version
So, great value for money and general performance ranging from very good to excellent. Oppo is on a winner with the R9s phone.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 02/01/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 90% precio: 100% rendimiento: 90%
Origen: Tech Nave EN→ES Archive.org version
Comparing it with the F1s, both phones share a lot of similarities and one might even opt for the F1s for being cheaper at RM1198, whereas the R9S stands at RM1798. That’s a RM600 difference and it’s easily understood why some customers won’t go for the R9S. However, the R9S is a lot better in terms of picture quality, and the performance is better with a Snapdragon 625 processor. Let’s not forget the awesome battery recharge technology as well. Despite these good points, we still wished OPPO could have been more creative in their design department for it. Seriously, guys.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 01/26/2017
Origen: Lowyat.net EN→ES Archive.org version
For the past one year, it is hard not to relate the word “selfie” with OPPO Malaysia’s smartphones given how the company has been working hard to establish its devices which include F1, F1 Plus, and F1s as the “Selfie Expert” devices. This year though, the company has somehow decided to focus on the power of rear camera with the arrival of R9s in our market.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 01/14/2017
Origen: Stuff TV EN→ES Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a worthy contender, although it doesn’t have the same expandable storage, and the excellent OnePlus 3 is a smidge more expensive, but packs a more powerful Snapdragon 820 chip. In any case, both examples do not have the will to last as long as the R9s.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 01/05/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: GSM Arena EN→ES Archive.org version
That said, Oppo's execution is the best, and this isn't just because of the six-string antenna design (though that's a big part of it). The R9s has the same screen size as the iPhone 7 Plus, but you wouldn't guess it - the Oppo is so much more compact and lighter. The fingerprint reader is faster than Apple's too.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 12/05/2016
Origen: Lowyat.net EN→ES Archive.org version
True to its promise, OPPO today has unveiled two new smartphones called R9s and R9s Plus. As indicated by their names, these new devices are generally the successor to the R9 (released in Malaysia as F1 Plus) and R9 Plus smartphones which themselves were just launched around seven months ago.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 10/19/2016
Origen: Chinahandys.net DE→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 04/06/2017
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% rendimiento: 50% pantalla: 90% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 100%
Origen: Komorkomania PL→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 10/20/2016
Origen: Komorkomania PL→ES Archive.org version
Comparación, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 10/14/2016
Origen: Webriyota.com TR→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 01/16/2017
Origen: TechZ VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 04/16/2017
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Estos procesadores gráficos pueden mostrar únicamente juegos antiguos, fluidamente. Juegos actuales pueden ser presentados con detalles sustancialmente reducidos.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
625:
SoC octa-core de gama media con ocho núcleos de cpu ARM Cortex-A53 con hasta 2 GHz, una GPU Adreno 506, un controlador de memoria DDR3L-1866 y un moderno X9 LTE (Cat 7). Manufacturado en el moderno proceso de 14nm.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
5.50": Esta pantalla es bastante grande para un smartphone, pero es usada a menudo en smartphones.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
82.4%: Esta evaluación es para ser considerada como promedio, porque la cantidad de portátiles con mejores evaluaciones es casi la misma que la cantidad con evaluaciones peores.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.