Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 1.12µm
Price comparison
Promedio de 5 puntuaciones (de 10 análisis)
Análisis para el Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S
Origen: Gadgets Now EN→ES Archive.org version
There is no denying that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S is a capable device and the starting price of Rs 10,999 makes the whole package more attractive. It has a mid-range processor, 48MP camera, lasting battery — all elements to make sure that you don’t face any issues in the everyday usage. The phone also looks pretty neat at the same time. These specs secure Redmi Note 7S' position as a major player in the sub-Rs 15,000 smartphone bracket, which is quite difficult to make an impact on these days.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 07/10/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: Android Authority EN→ES Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 7S isn’t the only great option in the entry level segment. Realme and Asus both have great smartphones in the segment, but none can offer a camera with such capabilities. It helps that the Redmi Note 7S is powerful enough for most. If photography is a priority, the Redmi Note 7S would be a great choice, but I would recommend stepping up to the slightly more expensive Redmi Note 7 Pro for a truly fantastic imaging experience in the sub-15,000 rupees (~$215) category of devices.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/10/2019
Origen: The Indian Express EN→ES Archive.org version
Yes, the new Redmi Note 7S has a good performance coupled with a very good camera for its price, though it didn’t fare so well on the gaming front. Don’t buy it just for that 48MP number at the back. Buy if you are in due for an upgrade, and don’t want to pay extra for the Pro.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/03/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: NDTV Gadgets EN→ES Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S and Note 7 are nearly identical when it comes to their hardware with the main difference being their rear camera modules. If you don't really care about camera performance, the Redmi Note 7 offers the same experience at lower prices. In that case, might want to hurry up as Xiaomi is planning to phase out the Redmi Note 7 in favour of the Redmi Note 7S.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/30/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 80% rendimiento: 80% pantalla: 80% movilidad: 80% procesamiento: 90%
Origen: India Today EN→ES Archive.org version
The Note 7S is a good phone. And it is totally worth its price of Rs 10,999. The problem for the Note 7S is the Note 7 Pro, which is a much better phone at a price of Rs 13,999. So here is the deal: if you don't mind spending extra Rs 3,000, then go for the Redmi Note 7 Pro as it offers much better camera and core hardware. The Note 7S should be your choice if you are strictly limited to Rs 10,999 and it goes without saying that at this price tag the Redmi Note 7S is a sweet deal.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 05/28/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80%
Origen: NDTV Gadgets EN→ES Archive.org version
In the constant rush to stay ahead of its competition, Xiaomi is hoping that the Redmi Note 7S will give buyers another option to choose from. The upgraded primary rear camera is the only difference between the new Redmi Note 7S and the Redmi Note 7. It also costs an extra Rs. 1,000, but will this phone dampen the Redmi Note 7 Pro's appeal? Keep reading Gadgets 360, as our full review of the Redmi Note 7S is coming up soon.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/20/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 80% precio: 80% rendimiento: 80% pantalla: 80% movilidad: 80% procesamiento: 90%
Origen: The Mobile Indian EN→ES Archive.org version
To conclude, the Redmi Note 7S offers better camera capabilities as compared to the standard version of the Redmi Note 7. It is a good thing that Xiaomi has introduced the cheapest smartphone with a 48-megapixel sensor. However, it might also backfire a bit as customers who recently bought a brand new Redmi Note 7, will surely feel cheated.
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/20/2019
Origen: Android Authority EN→ES Archive.org version
While it is great to see a lot of options in the market, Xiaomi risks alienating and confusing prospective buyers by introducing rapid, iterative models. What do you think? Does Xiaomi have too many smartphone models at similar price points or does it let you pick and choose the exact features that you want?
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/20/2019
Origen: FPT shop VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, corto, Fecha: 05/22/2019
Origen: Danviet VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy corto, Fecha: 05/21/2019
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
Tarjeta gráfica integrada basada en la arquitectura Adreno 500, como la Adreno 520 del Snapdragon 820. Según Qualcomm, es hasta un 30% más rápida que la generación anterior (¿Adreno 510?). Soporta DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Estos procesadores gráficos pueden mostrar únicamente juegos antiguos, fluidamente. Juegos actuales pueden ser presentados con detalles sustancialmente reducidos.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
SD 660:
Veloz SoC ARM de gama media con 8 núcleos de CPU Kryo 260 (cuatro núcleos veloces a 2,2 GHz en un cluster y dos núcleos de 1,8 GHz ahorradores de energía) y una GPU Adreno 512 bastante lenta. Producido en un proceso de 14 nm.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
6.30": Solo algunos smartphones tienen pantallas más grandes.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
76%: Esta evaluación no es convincente. Debe ser considerado que difícilmente existen portátiles que reciben una evaluación abajo de 60%. Esta portátil es evaluada abajo del promedio, esta realmente no es una recomendación para la compra.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.