Crosscall Stellar-X5
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Análisis para el Crosscall Stellar-X5
Origen: DxOMark
EN→ESThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/17/2024
Origen: DxOMark
EN→ESThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/11/2024
Origen: DxOMark
EN→ESThe Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/04/2024
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
Algunos juegos actuales no fastidiosos pueden ser jugados fluidamente con pequeños detalles.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC de gama media con 8 núcleos Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 de 2,2 GHz de rendimiento, 4x ARM Cortex A55 de 1,8 de eficiencia) y un módem X62 5G (hasta 2900 Mbps de descarga). El chip se fabrica utilizando el moderno proceso de 4 nm.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
6.58": Solo algunos smartphones tienen pantallas más grandes.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.
