Notebookcheck Logo

Crosscall Stellar Serie

Crosscall Stellar-M6Procesador: unknown, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 6 Gen 1
Adaptador Gráfico: unknown, Qualcomm Adreno 710
Pantalla: 6.10 pulgadas, 6.58 pulgadas
Peso: 0.2266kg, 0.249kg
Puntuación Media: 60% - pobre
Promedio de 1 puntuaciones (de 4 análisis)
rendimiento: 60%, pantalla: 40%, movilidad: 60%, procesamiento: 80%, ergonomía: 80%

 

Crosscall Stellar-X5

Especificaciones de Portátil(es)

Crosscall Stellar-X5Portátil: Crosscall Stellar-X5
Procesador: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 6 Gen 1
Adaptador Gráfico: Qualcomm Adreno 710
Pantalla: 6.58 pulgadas, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixeles
Peso: 0.249kg
Enlaces: Crosscall Pagina de inicio

Price comparison

 

Análises en otras idiomas

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Battery test
Origen: DxOMark Inglés EN→ES
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/17/2024
Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test
Origen: DxOMark Inglés EN→ES
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/11/2024
Crosscall Stellar-X5 Display test
Origen: DxOMark Inglés EN→ES
The Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 06/04/2024

 

Crosscall Stellar-M6

Especificaciones de Portátil(es)

Crosscall Stellar-M6Portátil: Crosscall Stellar-M6
Procesador: unknown
Adaptador Gráfico: unknown
Pantalla: 6.10 pulgadas, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixeles
Peso: 0.2266kg
Enlaces: Crosscall Pagina de inicio

Price comparison

Puntuación Media: 60% - pobre

Promedio de 1 puntuaciones (de 1 análisis)

 

Análises en otras idiomas

60% Crosscall Stellar-M6
Origen: Les Numeriques Francés FR→ES
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 12/14/2024
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 60% rendimiento: 60% pantalla: 40% movilidad: 60% procesamiento: 80% ergonomía: 80%

 

Comentario

Crosscall:


Algunos juegos actuales no fastidiosos pueden ser jugados fluidamente con pequeños detalles.

Qualcomm Adreno 710:

Muchos juegos son difícilmente ejecutables con estos adaptadores gráficos o se ejecutan de manera muy lenta.

unknown:


>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.


Qualcomm Snapdragon:

SD 6 Gen 1: SoC de gama media con 8 núcleos Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 de 2,2 GHz de rendimiento, 4x ARM Cortex A55 de 1,8 de eficiencia) y un módem X62 5G (hasta 2900 Mbps de descarga). El chip se fabrica utilizando el moderno proceso de 4 nm.

:


>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.



>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.


No weight comment found (one expected)!


60%: Una evaluación tan mala es rara. Difícilmente existen portátiles, que sean evaluadas peor.

>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Portátiles similares de otros fabricantes y con otro CPU

Blackview BV8200
unknown, unknown
Vivo X200 Mini
unknown, unknown
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
unknown, unknown

tamaño de pantalla mismo GPU

Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.251 kg
Huawei Mate X6
unknown, unknown, 7.93", 0.239 kg
Realme C75
unknown, unknown, 6.72", 0.196 kg
Xiaomi Redmi A4
unknown, unknown, 6.88", 0.2124 kg
Huawei Mate 70 Pro+
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.226 kg
Huawei Mate 70 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.221 kg
Huawei Mate 70
unknown, unknown, 6.70", 0.203 kg
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.76", 0.209 kg
Huawei Nova 13
unknown, unknown, 6.70", 0.195 kg
Blackview Shark 9
unknown, unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
Blackview BV7300
unknown, unknown, 6.67", 0.528 kg
Cubot KingKong Power 3
unknown, unknown, 6.72", 0.425 kg
HMD Barbie Phone
unknown, T107, 2.80", 0.1235 kg
Huawei Nova Flip
unknown, unknown, 6.94", 0.195 kg
Comparador de precios
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)