Vivo Nex 3
Especificaciones de Portátil(es)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Promedio de 3 puntuaciones (de 17 análisis)
Análisis para el Vivo Nex 3
Origen: The Tech Revolutionist EN→ES Archive.org version
The Vivo NEX 3 comes with many practical new features that makes this smartphone a pleasure to work with. Unlike other brands which pushes out insensible features just for the sake of it, we can see that every feature that comes with the Vivo NEX 3 is highly usable, and can really be deemed as an improvement to previous technologies.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 12/04/2019
Origen: Manila Shaker EN→ES Archive.org version
Vivo Nex 3 is becoming available in more and more markets. As the Chinese company continues to answer the demand of its fanbase, it’s only a matter of time until the succeeding Nex phones become a true flagship lineup. In the case of Nex 3, it feels more like a flagship smartphone than a concept. It looks great and it performs great.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 11/09/2019
Origen: Android Authority EN→ES Archive.org version
If that price difference is maintained in other markets, the Vivo Nex 3 should definitely be on your list of options. It’s fast, has a beautiful display, a versatile camera, and overall it feels pretty well rounded. The software is objectively worse than on most competitors, however, and camera performance isn’t as good as it could be. It’s up to you to decide how much weight you put on these features, but the Vivo Nex 3 is a strong alternative to some better-known flagships out there.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 10/17/2019
Origen: Unbox EN→ES Archive.org version
vivo really hit it out of the park with the NEX 3. A beautiful display, powerful internals and a great set of cameras make it one of the best flagships we have reviewed so far this year. All that’s left is availability and pricing – while we don’t know when the phone will land in the Philippines, vivo has said that they’re looking at bringing over the 4G variant over to our shores this year. If vivo sticks closely to the RMB 4998 price tag that the 4G version retails for in China when they bring it to the Philippines, then they definitely have a winner in their hands.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 10/04/2019
Origen: Tech Advisor EN→ES Archive.org version
There's not a lot to dislike about the Nex 3. Importers - especially in the US - are probably better off ditching the 5G and sticking to the regular 4G model, but beyond that this phone offers almost everything you might want from a 2019 flagship. The huge curved panel is beautiful, the battery is banging, and the internal specs rival just about any other phone on the market. The only real letdowns are the lack of waterproofing, an occasionally clunky operating system, and a camera that's good but can't quite keep up with the best out there.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/27/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 90%
Origen: Igeekphone EN→ES Archive.org version
There is no doubt that the Vivo NEX 3 is a true flagship phone because it has enough highlights to support it, such as the Snapdragon 855 Plus, UFS 3.0 flash memory, 64 megapixels main camera, 44W fast charge, etc., but these features are on the waterfall screen and In front of 5G, it is more like a icing on the cake. For the waterfall screen, we can not be optimistic about its development, but we must not deny, ridicule the courage of NEX 3 to try and the meaning of the screen.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/24/2019
Origen: Pocket Lint EN→ES Archive.org version
The huge waterfall display - a term that we're sure will catch on, as it's likely to be a 2019-20 feature for incoming flagships - and high-resolution, well-designed triple camera system are two high of this Vivo. Not to mention the stacked innards for heaps of power and 5G connectivity. Sure, the software is a grind, and the absence of physical buttons to the side as a result of that display is weird - but, in the case of the latter, talk about futuristic, eh?
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Origen: Tech Advisor EN→ES Archive.org version
So far there's not a lot to dislike about the Nex 3. Importers - especially in the US - are probably better off ditching the 5G and sticking to the regular 4G model, but beyond that this phone offers almost everything you might want from a 2019 flagship. The huge curved panel is beautiful, early camera tests show promise, and the internal specs rival just about any other phone on the market. Unless you're committed to wireless charging there really isn't much missing from the Nex 3.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Origen: GSM Arena EN→ES Archive.org version
With a third model in the running, it's hard to associate the NEX lineup with a particular feature or form factor. The original NEX S brought us the first pop-up selfie design. The NEX Dual Display is yet to be matched by any of its competitors. And the NEX 3 is another innovative device in its own way.
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Origen: Unbox EN→ES Archive.org version
Regardless, vivo had finally made a phone that’s at the same level as the offerings of Samsung and domestic rival Huawei. The vivo NEX 3 is chock full of awesome features and hardware that we’ve never seen before – features that will start to become standard on the next flagship refresh cycle a few months from now.
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Origen: Yamobi RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 02/28/2020
Origen: Helpix RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Muy largo, Fecha: 02/04/2020
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 70%
Origen: DGL.ru RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Origen: Hi-Tech Mail RU→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 09/16/2019
Puntuación: Puntuación total: 79% rendimiento: 100% pantalla: 90% movilidad: 90% procesamiento: 100%
Origen: The Gioididong VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 11/18/2019
Origen: The Gioididong VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, largo, Fecha: 11/11/2019
Origen: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→ES Archive.org version
Único Análisis, disponible online, Mediano, Fecha: 09/19/2019
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 640:
Chip gráfico para smartphones y tablets que está integrado en el SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm afirma que es 20% más veloz que el Adreno 630 en el SoC Snapdragon 845 y ofrece 50% más unidades de cómputo (ALUs).
Algunos juegos actuales no fastidiosos pueden ser jugados fluidamente con pequeños detalles.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de tarjetas gráficas moviles y la lista de benchmarks.
SD 855+:
SoC de gama alta para smartphones, que se introdujo en 2019 y es producido en 7 nm en TSMC. Integra un ��Prime Core�� basado en una arquitectura ARM Cortex-A76 modificada con velocidad de hasta 2,96 GHz. Otros tres núcleos de rendimiento también se basan en el A76, pero llegan a una velocidad de hasta 2,42 GHz. Además, se integran cuatro núcleos de ahorro de energía basados en la arquitectura ARM Cortex-A55 y una velocidad de hasta 1,8 GHz. Además de los núcleos del procesador, el SoC integra un módem LTE X24 (download de hasta 2 Gigbit), un nuevo módem Wi-Fi (listo para Wi-Fi 6, 60 GHz mmWave), Hexagon 690 DSP con nuevos núcleos Tensor para procesamiento AI, un Spectra 380 ISP con un motor de visión por computadora integrado y un controlador de memoria LPDDR4x integrado. En comparación con el Snapdragon 855 normal, el 855 Plus ofrece mayores velocidades de la GPU y la CPU.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra comparación de procesadores móviles.
6.89": Solo algunos smartphones tienen pantallas más grandes.
Grandes tamaños de pantalla permiten resoluciones más altas. Por tanto, los detalles como letras son más grandes. Por otro lado, el consumo de energía es más bajo con diagonales de pantalla más pequeñas y los aparatos son más pequeños, más livianos y más económicos.
>> Para averiguar cual fina es una pantalla, vea nuestra lista de DPI.
79.67%: Esta evaluación no es convincente. Debe ser considerado que difícilmente existen portátiles que reciben una evaluación abajo de 60%. Esta portátil es evaluada abajo del promedio, esta realmente no es una recomendación para la compra.
>> Más información puede ser encontrada en nuestra Guia de compra de portátiles.