Análisis del Razer Blade 15 OLED (principios de 2022): Un portátil de juegos compacto con una RTX 3070 Ti

Name: Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Brand: Razer

Repulido.

La encarnación actual del Blade 15 sigue confiando en el potente hardware Alder Lake y Ampere, pero también ofrece una tentadora mejora: Razer ha apostado por una pantalla OLED de alto contraste (QHD) completa con una alta frecuencia de refresco (240 Hz) y una excelente cobertura del espacio de color.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traducido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/10/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

El Razer Blade 15 (principios de 2022) tiene la ambición de ser un portátil tanto para jugadores como para usuarios creativos. El hardware adecuado está a bordo: CPU Core i9-12900HcPU GeForce RTX 3070 Tiy una pantalla OLED de colores precisos (QHD). Se pueden encontrar competidores compactos similares en la forma del Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (mediados de 22)elAorus 15 XE5elHP Omen 16y elAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

La información relativa a la carcasa, las características, los dispositivos de entrada y los altavoces ya está a mano en nuestro análisis de su hermano, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Este último está equipado con un panel LED (QHD) - la diferencia más relevante con el dispositivo actual.

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)

Procesador

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Adaptador gráfico

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1035 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Memoría

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)

pantalla

15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, lustroso: si, 240 Hz

Placa base

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Disco duro

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB libre

Conexiones

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Equipamento de red

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235

Battería

80 Wh, 5209 mAh Litio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Características adicionales

Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantía

Peso

2.01 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 790 g

Precio

3249 Euro

Enlaces

Razer Pagina de inicio

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Posibles contendientes en la comparación

Valoración	Fecha	Modelo	Peso	Altura	Tamaño	Resolución
89.9 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	12/2022	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	08/2022	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.65 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440

Comparación de tamaños

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Aorus 15 XE5 SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Lado derecho: Lector de tarjetas de memoria (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, ranura para un bloqueo de cable

Lado izquierdo: Conector de alimentación, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de audio combinado

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +42%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1528 (1341^min - 1654^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz ()	1160 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1470 (1448^min - 1522^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz ()	1470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1692 (1588^min - 1709^max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1664 (1336^min - 1741^max) MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=5)	1628 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=73, last 2 years)	1485 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1612 (817^min - 1646^max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=9)	1418 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s -35%

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Pantalla - El ordenador móvil Razer incorpora un panel OLED

La pantalla OLED ofrece los mismos datos clave que su hermana de pantalla LED: Una resolución de 2560 x 1440 píxeles (QHD) a una frecuencia de actualización de 240 Hz y 15,6 pulgadas de diámetro.

Típico de los OLED, el panel gana puntos por sus maravillosos niveles de negro y sus rápidos tiempos de respuesta. Además, esto va acompañado de un brillo máximo relativamente alto. Esto es algo a lo que su homólogo LED no puede hacer frente.

Los puntos débiles del panel OLED: Tiene una superficie brillante y parpadea con un ajuste de brillo de ≤ 70 por ciento a una frecuencia de 500 Hz. El parpadeo inducido técnicamente está relacionado con la regulación del brillo del panel. En este sentido, su hermano panel LED mate y sin parpadeos de su hermano tiene las de perder.


385 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	387 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

Samsung ATNA562P02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminación: 99 %
Brillo con batería: 381 cd/m²
Contraste: 12767:1 (Negro: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Display		-6%	-4%	-20%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	97.6	92.8 -5%	95.2 -2%	67.3 -31%	71 -27%	99.1 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.5 -1%	99.9 1%	96.7 -3%	97.9 -2%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94	83.1 -12%	84.5 -10%	68.2 -27%	73.3 -22%	86.8 -8%
Response Times		-340%	-475%	-365%	-498%	-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) -280%	14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5) -620%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -625%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -620%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	10 ?(4.6, 5.4) -400%	8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5) -330%	7 ?(3.3, 3.7) -250%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) -370%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%
PWM Frequency	500 ?(70)
Screen		-96%	-169%	-178%	-184%	-106%
Brightness middle	383	497 30%	336 -12%	326 -15%	335 -13%	286 -25%
Brightness	384	481 25%	316 -18%	303 -21%	319 -17%	271 -29%
Brightness Distribution	99	82 -17%	89 -10%	89 -10%	90 -9%	89 -10%
Black Level *	0.03	0.21 -600%	0.34 -1033%	0.33 -1000%	0.28 -833%	0.25 -733%
Contrast	12767	2367 -81%	988 -92%	988 -92%	1196 -91%	1144 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	3.53 -87%	3.36 -78%	2.73 -44%	4.38 -132%	2.74 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.76	6.15 -64%	6.67 -77%	9.54 -154%	9.48 -152%	5.21 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.53 -32%	0.74 72%	1.36 49%	1.33 50%	2.52 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.26	1.74 -38%	4.7 -273%	5.2 -313%	7 -456%	1.1 13%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.244 ^98%	2.074 ^106%	2.103 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6386 ^102%	6418 ^101%	6897 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6244 ^104%	6408 ^101%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-147% / -112%	-216% / -177%	-188% / -171%	-233% / -193%	-219% / -147%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Ya desde el primer momento, la pantalla ofrece una reproducción del color impresionante: Con una desviación de 1,9, se cumple claramente el objetivo (DeltaE < 3). La calibración no conlleva ninguna mejora. La precisión del color está dada: Los espacios de color sRGB y DCI-P3 se reproducen completamente y casi completamente con el espacio de color AdobeRGB al 94 por ciento. El panel LED del hermano también ofrece resultados igualmente buenos.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 1 ms subida
2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 1 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 7 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 1 ms subida
2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 1 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 6 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado

500 Hz

≤ 70 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 500 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 70 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 500 Hz es relativamente alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Sin embargo, hay informes de que algunas personas pueden seguir viendo parpadeos a 500 Hz y superior, por lo que cuidado.

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8747 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

El panel ofrece una gran estabilidad del ángulo de visión y es legible desde cualquier ángulo. Sin embargo, en exteriores es difícil debido a la superficie brillante y reflectante de la pantalla.

Rendimiento - Blade 15 se basa en Alder Lake y Ampere

Con el Blade 15 (principios de 2022), Razer tiene un portátil en su gama de productos diseñado para juegos QHD (configuraciones altas a máximas), pero también es un buen modelo en áreas como la edición de vídeo y el renderizado. El modelo analizado aquí puede adquirirse por unos 1.967 dólares.

Condiciones de la prueba

Es posible cambiar entre los tres modos de rendimiento ("Equilibrado", "Silencioso" y "Definido por el usuario") mediante la combinación de teclas "Fn" + "P". El perfil "Definido por el usuario" permite subconfiguraciones para la CPU ("Bajo", "Medio", "Alto", "Boost") y la GPU ("Bajo", "Medio" y "Alto"), a través del software Razer Synapse preinstalado. En modo batería, solo está disponible el perfil "Equilibrado".

Las pruebas se llevaron a cabo usando el modo activo "Definido por el usuario" con los ajustes al máximo (sub-ajustes "Boost" y "Alto"). Para la prueba de batería se utilizó el perfil "Silencioso".

Procesador

ElCore i9-12900H(Alder Lake) consta de seis núcleos de rendimiento (hyperthreading, de 2,5 a 5 GHz) y ocho núcleos de eficiencia (sin hyperthreading, de 1,8 a 3,8 GHz). En total, hay 20 núcleos lógicos de CPU.

La prueba multihilo del benchmark Cinebench R15 se procesó a entre 3,6 y 3,8 GHz (núcleos P) y entre 2,8 y 2,9 GHz (núcleos E). La prueba monohilo se ejecutó a 1,4-4,5 GHz (núcleos P) y 1,5-3,5 GHz (núcleos E), respectivamente. En modo batería, las velocidades de reloj son inferiores. Así lo demuestra la prueba de bucle CB15: La carga multihilo sólo se afronta con una velocidad de reloj turbo alta durante un breve periodo de tiempo. Tras 30 o 40 segundos, los valores caen hasta aproximadamente la velocidad de reloj base.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

Velocidades de reloj de la CPU durante la ejecución del bucle CB15 (máx.)

Velocidades de reloj de la CPU durante la ejecución del bucle CB15 (equilibrado)

Velocidades de reloj de la CPU durante la ejecución del bucle CB15 (silencioso)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	83.8 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	74.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	73.9 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	70.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	69.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	67.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	67.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	52.5 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=194, last 2 years)	21642 Points +39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16170 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=28)	15133 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	10742 Points -31%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=192, last 2 years)	1878 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1930, n=28)	1829 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1759 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1515 Points -12%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years)	8236 Points +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points +1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	6044 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=28)	5717 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	4148 Points -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years)	722 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=28)	706 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)	3392 Points +33%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	2711 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=28)	2454 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1547 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)	276 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=29)	262 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points -8%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	309 Seconds * -40%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=28)	231 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +22%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years)	84613 MIPS +33%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=28)	60849 MIPS -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	58296 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47298 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years)	6280 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=28)	5843 MIPS +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	5739 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	5492 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years)	14892 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	12832 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=31)	11913 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	8261 Points -32%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years)	1882 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1897, n=31)	1800 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1728 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1579 Points -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +35%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)	17.1 fps -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	12.8 fps -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)	42.4 s * +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * +19%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	37.5 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.557 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec *
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4647 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)	0.454 sec * +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * +11%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years)	0.4401 sec * +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * +13%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

213 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

662 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6007 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1721 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15600 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	97.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	78.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	72.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	68.7 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	68.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	64.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=188, last 2 years)	21618 KRay/s +60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12736 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12680 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=28)	11191 KRay/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=188, last 2 years)	105988 Points +48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63698 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61649 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=28)	55458 Points -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=188, last 2 years)	4848 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4107 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=28)	3048 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3023 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=188, last 2 years)	116174 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102811 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=28)	100462 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86848 Points -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=188, last 2 years)	13167 Points +36%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=28)	9016 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8872 Points -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8654 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=188, last 2 years)	53413 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37197 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31084 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=28)	28667 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135380 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113172 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=188, last 2 years)	109484 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=28)	85711 MB/s -14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=188, last 2 years)	1348 MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=28)	932 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s -13%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	860 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	690 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=188, last 2 years)	11643 KRay/s +60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6946 KRay/s -4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6843 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=28)	6205 KRay/s -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=189, last 2 years)	39933 MPixel/s +16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=29)	36660 MPixel/s +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	35065 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26692 MPixel/s -23%

Rendimiento del sistema

El sistema funciona de forma fluida y fiable y ofrece potencia suficiente para aplicaciones exigentes como renderizado, edición de vídeo y juegos. Las tasas de transferencia de la RAM están a un nivel normal para una memoria DDR5-4800 y esto se complementa con los buenos resultados de PC-Mark.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)	7771 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6126 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=168, last 2 years)	10833 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10764 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9544 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10352 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=168, last 2 years)	9878 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8571 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=168, last 2 years)	12018 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11099 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7627 Points -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1947 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=152, last 2 years)	1900 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1656 Points -4%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1887 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=152, last 2 years)	1802 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1640 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=152, last 2 years)	2084 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1983 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1692 Points -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2022 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=152, last 2 years)	1700 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1600 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5101 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5789 puntos
PCMark 10 Score		7336 puntos
ayuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=188, last 2 years)	64901 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=28)	58945 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50524 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48120 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=188, last 2 years)	68661 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=28)	61718 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57551 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48849 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=188, last 2 years)	66722 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=28)	59318 MB/s +2%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58294 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46056 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns *
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.1 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=188, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=27)	85.7 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Latencias del CPD

La prueba de monitorización de latencia estandarizada (navegación por internet, reproducción de vídeo 4k, Prime95 a alta carga) reveló anomalías. El sistema no parece adecuado para la edición de vídeo y audio en tiempo real. No obstante, futuras actualizaciones de software podrían mejorar o empeorar el rendimiento.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3261 μs * -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * -46%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1109.7 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * +23%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Almacenamiento masivo

El Blade tiene espacio para dos SSD PCIe-4 en formato M.2 2280. El SSD PCIe-4 instalado (1 TB) de Samsung ofrece muy buenas tasas de transferencia. No hubo caídas de rendimiento debidas al ahogo térmico.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	83.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4199 (4194.93^min - 4199.13^max) MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4117 (3552.16^min - 4116.81^max) MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4677, n=85)	3764 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=169, last 2 years)	3500 MB/s -2%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4299 (4288.86^min - 4298.95^max) MB/s +22%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4236 (3477.46^min - 4236.46^max) MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=169, last 2 years)	3819 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2220 - 4564, n=85)	3578 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7020 (5888.98^min - 7020.02^max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6847 (6590.72^min - 6846.78^max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7100, n=85)	6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=169, last 2 years)	6365 MB/s -4%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4999 (4982.73^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=169, last 2 years)	4855 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2216 - 5281, n=85)	4814 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4421 (4173.33^min - 4420.8^max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.6 (67.84^min - 80.61^max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	77.9 (77.66^min - 77.9^max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)	76.7 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=169, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s -19%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	333 (331.94^min - 333.25^max) MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	239 (238.19^min - 238.82^max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=169, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 280, n=85)	188.5 MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4309 (4179.96^min - 4309.38^max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3566 (3562.85^min - 3566.11^max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=85)	2579 MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=169, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s -39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3600 (3594.9^min - 3599.81^max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3435 (2876.62^min - 3435.27^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=169, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -40%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=85)	1957 MB/s -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9117 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8376 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7659 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6864 Points -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=85)	6855 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=160, last 2 years)	6742 Points -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3431 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3123 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2562 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=160, last 2 years)	2445 Points -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=85)	2417 Points -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1994 Points -30%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3814 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3723 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (921 - 4043, n=85)	3272 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=160, last 2 years)	3113 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3093 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2953 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2916 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2563 Points -12%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5750 MB/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5592.23 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5396.69 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5171.96 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=160, last 2 years)	4976 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2638 - 5621, n=85)	4891 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4623.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3388 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4240 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4073 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3881.37 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=160, last 2 years)	3750 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3551.32 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1617 - 4526, n=85)	3320 MB/s -7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3311.86 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2667.04 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	106.98 MB/s +77%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	73.81 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)	72.4 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	67.2 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	66.29 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=160, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	52.1 MB/s -14%
4K Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	289.15 MB/s +57%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	247.26 MB/s +34%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	221.3 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=160, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	205 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	189.98 MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (118.6 - 246, n=85)	186 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	183.9 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2909.44 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2789 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2539.3 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2335.71 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2171 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=160, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (421 - 2854, n=85)	1855 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1380.56 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3193.44 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3144.88 MB/s +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (367 - 3451, n=85)	2754 MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2579.14 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=160, last 2 years)	2529 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2376.83 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2324 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1934 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.083 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.07 ms * +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.056 ms * +33%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=159, last 2 years)	0.05489 ms * +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.052 ms * +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.045 ms * +46%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)	0.03777 ms * +54%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.023 ms * +72%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.058 ms * -164%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=160, last 2 years)	0.04827 ms * -119%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)	0.03406 ms * -55%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.022 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.02 ms * +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.016 ms * +27%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +41%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7)

Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø7001 (6418.71-7045.97)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6496 (1637.54-6888.72)

Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6887 (6595.77-6910.33)

Tarjeta gráfica

LaGeForce RTX 3070 Tipara portátiles (VRAM: 8192 MB GDDR6) ofrece resultados 3D-Mark al nivel medio de la GPU determinado hasta ahora y se nota el relativamente bajo TGP máximo de 110 vatios. La salida directa de imágenes a través de la GPU GeForce conlleva un aumento insignificante del rendimiento gráfico. El cambio entre los modos Optimus y dGPU se realiza directamente en la BIOS o a través del software Razer Synapse. Optimus avanzado no es compatible.

Fire Strike (alimentación de pared, máx.)

Fire Strike (alimentación de pared, dGPU, Max)

Fire Strike (alimentación de pared, equilibrada)

Fire Strike (alimentación de pared, silencioso)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	98.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	90.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	87.2 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	85.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	85.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	79.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	78 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)	43524 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	37438 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37151 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	36023 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (13799 - 42569, n=36)	35944 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	35719 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	34141 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	32236 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	32235 Points -11%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	153993 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	153719 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	145558 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144658 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	141689 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	137434 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (33126 - 181005, n=25)	130456 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)	31252 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	28601 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28374 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22612 - 32550, n=37)	27554 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	27309 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	27183 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25891 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	24766 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	24618 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)	13032 Points +28%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	11071 Points +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	10623 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (8142 - 12324, n=37)	10478 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	10357 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10157 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9980 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	9421 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	9048 Points -11%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		48871 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance		30645 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59982 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23793 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score		10342 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	28 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	26 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	26 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds * +3%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	24 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	45 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	45 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	44 Seconds * +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds * +8%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	40 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * +18%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	559 Seconds * -49%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)	404 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)	378 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	376 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)	329 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=192, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +21%

GPUScore: Sacred Path
2560x1440 Official VRS
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)	134.8 (63.1^min, 116.3^P1 - 196.8^max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)	17.9 (14.8^min, 14.9^P1 - 27.9^max) fps -87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)	134.8 (63.1^min, 116.3^P1 - 196.8^max) fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12. dGPU)	132.1 (111.8^min, 113.5^P1 - 195.7^max) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (6.89 - 305, n=233, last 2 years)	129.1 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (17.9 - 134.8, n=4)	104.9 fps -22%
2560x1440 Official
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)	130.6 (107.4^min, 111.4^P1 - 183.5^max) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12, dGPU)	122.4 (103.4^min, 104.7^P1 - 186.3^max) fps -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)	129.4 (23^min, 110^P1 - 180.4^max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)	17 (14.2^min, 14.3^P1 - 25.6^max) fps -87%
Average of class Gaming (2.34 - 291, n=307, last 2 years)	124.3 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (1.0.0 Vulkan 1.3)	115.7 (58.1^min, 92.3^P1 - 149.7^max) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (17 - 130.6, n=6)	107.2 fps -17%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	128448 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=194, last 2 years)	126107 Points +8%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	123594 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (100630 - 150471, n=38)	121784 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	116873 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	110844 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	109157 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	108536 Points -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	107175 Points -8%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	86126 Points
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (52594 - 92020, n=10)	67737 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	64974 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	61835 Points

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	96149 Points +403%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (19109 - 96149, n=2)	57629 Points +202%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points +151%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	19109 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	104147 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (103225 - 104147, n=2)	103686 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)	103225 Points -1%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=115, last 2 years)	2179 mpaths +47%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	1834 mpaths +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1334 - 1847, n=15)	1570 mpaths +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	1480 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	1471 mpaths -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	1455 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=117, last 2 years)	1566 mpaths +29%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	1378 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1062 - 1391, n=14)	1261 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	1214 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	1210 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	1194 mpaths -2%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=120, last 2 years)	15052 mpaths +45%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)	10826 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)	10360 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H (5.0.1)	10193 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (2880 - 11931, n=20)	9832 mpaths -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)	9590 mpaths -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)	7572 mpaths -27%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=153, last 2 years)	699 mpaths +57%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	558 mpaths +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (277 - 559, n=33)	465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )	456 mpaths +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	445 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)	435 mpaths -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	399 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	398 mpaths -11%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=153, last 2 years)	21361 ksamples +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	18763 ksamples +20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)	16498 ksamples +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	16474 ksamples +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )	15575 ksamples
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (4722 - 19786, n=33)	15523 ksamples 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )	14684 ksamples -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )	11804 ksamples -24%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps +83%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	20.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (19.9 - 20.4, n=2)	20.2 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	18.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps +22%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	33.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (32.1 - 33.1, n=2)	32.6 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	32 fps -3%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +25%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	334 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	334 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	285.6 fps -14%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps +102%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (23.6 - 23.8, n=2)	23.7 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	23.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	23.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	95 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	85.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	65.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (63.6 - 65.5, n=2)	64.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.6 fps -9%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	104.8 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	98.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (95.6 - 98.5, n=2)	97 fps -2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Rendimiento en juegos

El portátil está diseñado para juegos QHD con ajustes de altos a máximos. Resoluciones superiores serían posibles conectándolo a un monitor adecuado - aunque a ajustes a veces reducidos. La tasa de frames de los títulos probados está a un nivel típico para la determinada media RTX 3070 Ti. La salida de imagen directa a través de GeForce GPU puede conducir - dependiendo del juego - a un aumento mínimo de la velocidad de fotogramas.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91.3 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	77.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	126.8 fps +32%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107.2 (99^min) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)	102.4 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.1 (21.9^min, 25.6^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.7 (83^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	97.7 (84^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 (82^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	91.8 (38.7^min, 41.3^P0.1, 60.8^P1) fps -5%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118 (4.44^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115.6 (3.67^min, 83.3^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	113.7 (33.2^min, 76.9^P1) fps +1%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=172, last 2 years)	113.1 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (16.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.2 (10.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	108.1 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36)	106.7 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	100 (16.4^min, 66.7^P1) fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=185, last 2 years)	119 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	106 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	104.6 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)	103.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	100.3 fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.6 (59^min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)	98.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	94.8 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)	93.8 fps -6%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=183, last 2 years)	227 fps +31%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	188.5 (48.7^min, 134^P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	184 (33.3^min, 131^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (109 - 221, n=37)	179.9 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)	175.9 (41.6^min, 131.7^P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	173.4 (30.1^min, 131.1^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	165.6 (39.1^min, 131.2^P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163.8 (35.9^min, 125.2^P1) fps -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	146.6 (72.6^min, 102.4^P1) fps -15%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.5 (140.4^min) fps +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (135.1^min) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=191, last 2 years)	149.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	145.2 (127.1^min) fps +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	140.8 (121.1^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)	135.6 fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	134.9 (115.1^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	133 (114.4^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	125.3 (106.2^min) fps -6%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	115 fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.5 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=197, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +13%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105.3 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)	100.8 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)	95.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86.8 fps -9%

Para comprobar si las frecuencias de cuadro se mantienen estables durante largos periodos de tiempo, ejecutamos el juego "The Witcher 3" durante unos 60 minutos a resolución Full HD y ajustes de máxima calidad. El personaje del juego no se movió y no se produjo ninguna caída notable de la frecuencia de imagen.

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97)

Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.3 (92-105)

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø96.2 (88-100)

Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102.3 (87-111)

Análisis de la GPU durante la prueba Witcher 3 (Max)

Análisis de la GPU durante la prueba Witcher 3 (Max, dGPU)

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	182.7	177.2	172.8	113	94.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	365.8	288.5	176.6	96.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	162	148.2	143.4	133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	174.2	133.3	100.3		75.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	133.3	121.6	95
Far Cry 5 (2018)	170	141	135	126	100
Strange Brigade (2018)	351	240	197.2	173.4	130.9
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	124.8	97.8	70.2	52.2	41.3
F1 22 (2022)	203	202	173.1	65.2	42.3
FIFA 23 (2022)					104.3
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	101.6	84	73.3	62.9	50.5
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	78	75.2	71.8	69.3	56.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)	126	112	89	85	63
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	107	102.6	94.9	93.2	69.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	117	99.3	71	70.7	52.8
Need for Speed Unbound (2022)	112.8	106.9	93	84.6	66.7
High On Life (2023)	175.7	139.4	117.5	97.1	60.8
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023)	174.4	149.6	81.3	71.4	47.4
Dead Space Remake (2023)	82.1	74.6	68.1	66.8	47.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	88.5	79	69.7	59.3	42.6

Emisiones - El portátil Razer no se calienta en exceso

Emisiones sonoras

En general, para un portátil de juegos, los niveles de ruido son moderados. En reposo y uso diario (oficina e internet), los ventiladores funcionan a baja velocidad y son prácticamente inaudibles. A plena carga (test de estrés, Witcher 3 test) los niveles de presión sonora pueden subir a 43.9 dB (A). El perfil de rendimiento "Silencioso" no hace lo que sugiere su nombre, pero consigue reducir el ruido de fondo - a costa de la potencia de cálculo.

Ruido

Ocioso		28 / 28 / 28 dB(A)
Carga		38.5 / 43.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Noise		-10%	-6%	-5%	-16%	-4%
off / environment *	26	23 12%	24 8%	26 -0%	26 -0%	25.4 2%
Idle Minimum *	28	23 18%	26 7%	26 7%	30 -7%	26.2 6%
Idle Average *	28	24 14%	28 -0%	28 -0%	31 -11%	26.2 6%
Idle Maximum *	28	47 -68%	30 -7%	31 -11%	33 -18%	28.4 -1%
Load Average *	38.5	47.91 -24%	48 -25%	45 -17%	49 -27%	44.7 -16%
Load Maximum *	43.9	50.25 -14%	52 -18%	48 -9%	57 -30%	51.9 -18%
Witcher 3 ultra *		48.91	52	46	53	44.7

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Temperatura

En el uso diario (oficina, internet) las temperaturas de la carcasa se mantienen en la zona verde. Bajo carga (test de estrés, Witcher 3 test) el portátil se calienta notablemente, pero no en exceso.

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


42.9 °C	49.5 °C	40.9 °C
32.2 °C	45.5 °C	30.9 °C
36.5 °C	34.4 °C	32.9 °C

Máximo: 49.5 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C


44.3 °C	47.5 °C	41 °C
34.7 °C	45.7 °C	38.1 °C
37.4 °C	41.2 °C	36.1 °C

Máximo: 47.5 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C

Conector de corriente 55.8 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


29.8 °C	33.4 °C	31.2 °C
28 °C	31.1 °C	27.6 °C
30.4 °C	29.2 °C	28.9 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 30 °C


34.3 °C	35 °C	34.1 °C
30.9 °C	33.5 °C	30.4 °C
30.5 °C	32.4 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C

Conector de corriente 33.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máx.

Inactivo

Witcher 3


44.3 °C	50.4 °C	41.1 °C
41.8 °C	46.8 °C	30.5 °C
38 °C	34.9 °C	34.9 °C

Máximo: 50.4 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C


46.1 °C	48.1 °C	42.1 °C
39.8 °C	49.7 °C	38.1 °C
37.2 °C	43 °C	40.1 °C

Máximo: 49.7 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C

Conector de corriente 51.9 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

Top de distribución de calor (Witcher 3)

Fondo de distribución de calor (ralentí)

Fondo de distribución de calor (Witcher 3)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		2%	-12%	-15%	9%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	49.5	52 -5%	46 7%	52 -5%	41 17%	50 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	47.5	51 -7%	57 -20%	63 -33%	62 -31%	47 1%
Idle Upper Side *	33.4	29 13%	38 -14%	37 -11%	25 25%	37.4 -12%
Idle Bottom *	35	33 6%	42 -20%	38 -9%	26 26%	38.4 -10%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Prueba de esfuerzo

La prueba de estrés (Prime95 y Furmark en funcionamiento continuo) presenta el escenario extremo de análisis de la estabilidad del sistema a plena carga. En el transcurso de la prueba, la velocidad de reloj de la CPU cayó desde un punto inicial de 2,5 GHz (núcleos P) y 2,1 GHz (núcleos E), respectivamente, hasta alrededor de 1,7 GHz (núcleos P) y 1,5 GHz (núcleos E), respectivamente. La velocidad de reloj de la GPU oscila entre 700 y 1.300 MHz.

Altavoces

Los altavoces estéreo producen un sonido decente pero al que le faltan graves.

Diagrama de frecuencia en comparación (¡las casillas de verificación se pueden marcar y desmarcar!)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gestión de la energía: el Blade consume mucha energía en reposo

Consumo de energía

En reposo, los requisitos de energía (hasta 39 vatios) son comparativamente altos. Este parece ser un problema general encontrado en los modelos Blade 2022 que encontramos en muchas ocasiones. Bajo carga, el consumo es normal para este tipo de hardware. Mientras que la prueba Witcher 3 funcionó con un consumo de energía constante, los requisitos cayeron abruptamente durante la prueba de estrés - la CPU fue sofocada. La fuente de alimentación (230 vatios) está adecuadamente dimensionada.

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.65 / 5.7 Watt
Ocioso	31.6 / 33.3 / 38.6 Watt
Carga	149 / 160 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		26%	-18%	24%	29%	-8%	18%	21%
Idle Minimum *	31.6	10.8 66%	31 2%	12 62%	4 87%	33.2 -5%	14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27) 55%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) 57%
Idle Average *	33.3	17 49%	35 -5%	17 49%	10 70%	36.4 -9%	19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27) 40%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) 43%
Idle Maximum *	38.6	17.8 54%	46 -19%	24 38%	19 51%	37.6 3%	26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27) 32%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) 31%
Load Average *	149	116 22%	120 19%	106 29%	114 23%	116.7 22%	125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27) 16%	106.9 ?(32.1 - 201, n=156, last 2 years) 28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	149.6	144 4%	202 -35%	159.9 -7%	183.2 -22%	172 -15%
Load Maximum *	160	220 -38%	268 -68%	208 -30%	221 -38%	228.6 -43%	248 ?(160 - 319, n=27) -55%	250 ?(55.3 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -56%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (124.3-155)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø149.2 (145.9-160.7)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø34.3 (32.4-37.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø65.5 (61.8-78.2)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (43-78.2)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132.4-160.1)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø143.3 (134.9-149.9)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.4 (23.4-28.2)

Duración de la batería

En la prueba WiFi (apertura de páginas web mediante un script) y la prueba de vídeo (cortometraje Big Buck Bunny (codificación H.264, FHD) en bucle), el dispositivo de 15 pulgadas logró duraciones de batería de 4,34 horas y 5,52 horas, respectivamente. Las funciones de ahorro de energía del portátil se desactivaron durante ambas pruebas y el brillo de la pantalla se fijó en 150 cd/m². La prueba de vídeo también se realizó con el módulo de radio apagado.

En general, el Blade no fue capaz de ofrecer una duración de batería impresionante, ni siquiera para un potente portátil QHD. En general, la competencia ofrece mejor aguante - tanto en términos absolutos como en términos de vatios-hora calculados.

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		6h 44min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)		4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 52min
Carga (máximo brillo)		2h 05min

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Duración de Batería		18%	24%	52%	21%	7%	15%
Reader / Idle	404		601 49%	931 130%	603 49%		565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 40%
H.264	352	436 24%	371 5%	448 27%			408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 16%
WiFi v1.3	274	445 62%	410 50%	446 63%	336 23%	292 7%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 37%
Load	125	86 -31%	112 -10%	109 -13%	114 -9%		85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -32%

Pro

+ Pantalla OLED brillante y de alto contraste (QHD)

+ Buena reproducción del color y cobertura del espacio de color

+ Marco de pantalla delgado

+ Robusta carcasa metálica

+ Alto rendimiento del sistema

+ Producción de calor relativamente moderada

+ SSD PCIe-4

+ Espacio para una segunda SSD PCIe-4

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ Alimentación

Contra

- Pantalla reflectante

- Poca duración de la batería

- Gran consumo de energía en reposo

- Sin Optimus avanzado

Veredicto: una potencia compacta

El Razer Blade 15 (principios del 22), proporcionado por Razer.

Las principales áreas de aplicación del Blade 15 deberían encontrarse en la edición de vídeo, el renderizado y los juegos. ElCore-i9 12900HcPU y GeForce RTX 3070 Ti portátilgPU (TGP: 110 vatios) ofrecen la potencia necesaria. Un veloz SSD PCIe-4 (1 TB) garantiza tiempos de carga cortos.

El Blade 15 OLED (principios de 2022) es una potente herramienta tanto para jugadores como para creativos.

La atención no sólo se centra en el alto rendimiento: Los resultados máximos de los núcleos de cálculo están en la media cuando se comparan con portátiles anteriormente analizados con el 12900H o el 3070 Ti. Mientras que la producción de calor es típica para un portátil de esta potencia, las emisiones de ruido son relativamente moderadas. Esto último no puede decirse del consumo de energía en uso inactivo: El Blade 15 se ayuda a sí mismo con un gran trago de la botella.

La duración real de la batería, de 4 a 6 horas, no impresiona. En este aspecto, la competencia tiene mucho más que ofrecer. No obstante, la batería se puede cargar con una fuente de alimentación universal USB-C (mín. 65W, 20V) y ambos puertos USB-C (2x Thunderbolt) soportan Power Delivery (y Displayport).

En general, el panel OLED reflectante (QHD) puntúa algo mejor que el panel LED convencional (QHD) del modelo Blade 2022 analizado anteriormente. Ambas pantallas ofrecen una buena cobertura del espacio de color (sRGB: 100 %) y una buena reproducción del color. El modelo OLED se lleva la palma en cuanto a niveles de negro, brillo y tiempos de respuesta, mientras que el modelo LED gana puntos gracias a su superficie mate.

Una posible alternativa a este dispositivo podría ser elAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z. En cuanto al rendimiento, el procesador está a la par, pero gana puntos gracias a una pantalla más brillante en formato 16:10 y a una duración de batería considerablemente mayor. Una alternativa económica podría ser elAorus 15 XE5. A pesar de que el precio de esta máquina es unos cientos de dólares más barato, ofrece un poco más de potencia y mejor duración de la batería que el Blade.

Precio y disponibilidad

La especificación de revisión Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22) se puede tener en Amazon por $ 1,967.

▶ load Youtube video

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) - 2023-03-04 03/04/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado

88 / 98 → 89%

Teclado

83%

Ratón

89%

Conectividad

73 / 80 → 91%

Peso

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Battería

63 / 95 → 66%

Pantalla

91%

Rendimiento de juegos

99%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

93%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruido

85 / 90 → 95%

Audio

82%

Cámara

47 / 85 → 55%

Médio

80%

90%

Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 112 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 454464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Análisis del Razer Blade 15 OLED (principios de 2022): Un portátil de juegos compacto con una RTX 3070 Ti

Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-10 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Análisis del Razer Blade 15 OLED (principios de 2022): Un portátil de juegos compacto con una RTX 3070 Ti

Repulido.

Posibles contendientes en la comparación

Comparación de tamaños

Pantalla - El ordenador móvil Razer incorpora un panel OLED

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Rendimiento - Blade 15 se basa en Alder Lake y Ampere

Condiciones de la prueba

Procesador

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Rendimiento del sistema

Latencias del CPD

Almacenamiento masivo

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Tarjeta gráfica

Rendimiento en juegos

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

Emisiones - El portátil Razer no se calienta en exceso

Emisiones sonoras

Temperatura

Prueba de esfuerzo

Altavoces

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

Gestión de la energía: el Blade consume mucha energía en reposo

Consumo de energía

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

Duración de la batería

Pro

Contra

Veredicto: una potencia compacta

Precio y disponibilidad

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison