Notebookcheck Logo

Análisis del XMG Neo 16 (Early 24): Toda la potencia de la RTX 4090 en un portátil de juegos compacto

Traigan el agua. El Neo 16 es actualmente uno de los portátiles más potentes: Core i9 14900HX y GeForce RTX 4090 preparan el ordenador para juegos, streaming y renderizado. Un sistema de refrigeración por agua opcional y externo exprime hasta la última gota del hardware.

Con el Neo 16, Schenker atiende al segmento de gama alta y, en consecuencia, no hay medias tintas: Core i9, GeForce RTX 4090 y 32 GB de RAM equipan al portátil para escenarios de aplicaciones exigentes (streaming, renderizado, juegos). Pero, esto tiene un coste: Tendrá que desembolsar unos 4.000 dólares (tipo de cambio actual dólar/euro) por el modelo de revisión, aunque también se pueden conseguir variantes más baratas a partir de 2.000 dólares. La base la proporciona el barebone Tongfang (GM6IX9B). Los competidores vienen en forma de, por ejemplo, el Razer Blade 16el Medion Erazer Beast X40 y el Asus ROG Strix Scar 17.

El dispositivo es similar al modelo 2023 pero presenta algunas novedades: Una pantalla más brillante, un sistema de refrigeración revisado y un mayor ángulo de apertura. El teclado mecánico (opcional) que se encontraba en el predecesor no forma parte de la oferta del modelo 2024.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (XMG Neo 16 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 205 W PL2 / Short Burst, 205 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 2040 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 32.0.15.5599, Advanced Optimus, MUX-Switch
Memoría
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
pantalla
16.00 pulgadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixels 189 PPI, BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, G-Sync, lustroso: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Placa base
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco duro
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2 2280, 865 GB libre
Conexiones
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, , TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 26.6 x 356.7 x 253
Battería
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Litio-Polimero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, USB Thumbdrive (Drivers, Manuals), Stickers, Mousepad, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.52 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 970 g
Precio
3800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Posibles contendientes en la comparación

Valoración
Version
Fecha
Modelo
Peso
Altura
Tamaño
Resolución
Price
85.5 %v8
06/2024
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.1 %v7 (old)
02/2024
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %v7 (old)
02/2024
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg36 mm17.00"2560x1600
87.2 %v7 (old)
08/2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440

Carcasa - El portátil XMG tiene un chasis de aluminio

El chasis del modelo 2023 no se utiliza en el actual modelo Neo. La nueva cubierta tiene más en común con la carcasa vista en los últimos portátiles XMG: un paso en la dirección correcta: En lugar de una mezcla de plástico y metal, el fabricante ha optado por una carcasa hecha completamente de metal (Excepción: los biseles de la pantalla son de plástico). El chasis es tan estable como cabría esperar. La unidad base y la tapa sólo pueden torcerse ligeramente. La tapa permite un ángulo de apertura de hasta 180 grados (modelo 2023: 135 grados). Esto facilita la visualización del contenido cuando hay varias personas presentes. Las bisagras herméticas mantienen la tapa en su sitio y en casi cualquier ángulo. Es posible abrir el dispositivo con una sola mano.

Los elementos de diseño llamativos no se ven por ninguna parte, lo que significa que el ordenador negro mate corta una figura bastante seria. Además de las teclas retroiluminadas (RGB), una tira de LED definida por el usuario y personalizable individualmente proporciona un alivio luminoso de colores.

El último Neo 16 parece algo más compacto que el predecesor, pero, en cuanto a su peso, los portátiles no se pueden diferenciar. Sólo el Blade 16 ofrece más compacidad - y con un peso casi idéntico.

Comparación de tamaños

395 mm 282.1 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg383 mm 272 mm 36 mm 2.9 kg357 mm 268 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg356.7 mm 253 mm 26.6 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 22 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Características - USB 4 a bordo

Cuatro de los cinco puertos USB del Neo 16 (3x USB-A, 2x USB-C) funcionan según el estándar USB 3.2 Gen 1. Sólo el puerto USB-C de la parte trasera aporta Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4), que incluye compatibilidad con Power Delivery y el modo Display Alt. Dispone de un total de dos salidas de vídeo (1x HDMI, 1x DP). Una toma de audio y un puerto Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s) completan la oferta.

La distancia entre los puertos USB (lado derecho: 12 mm, lado izquierdo: 8 mm) parece adecuadamente proporcionada: Se pueden enchufar al mismo tiempo dos memorias (conectores) de tamaño típico (ver imágenes de la galería). Las salidas de vídeo y los conectores de alimentación se encuentran en la parte trasera del aparato. Los cables asociados irían hacia la parte trasera y, por tanto, no estorbarían.

Lado izquierdo: Ranura para un bloqueo de cable, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), combo de audio
Lado izquierdo: Ranura para un bloqueo de cable, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), combo de audio
Lado derecho: Lector de tarjetas de memoria (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Lado derecho: Lector de tarjetas de memoria (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Parte trasera: 2x conectores para la refrigeración por agua, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport, G-Sync), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), conector de alimentación
Parte trasera: 2x conectores para la refrigeración por agua, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport, G-Sync), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), conector de alimentación

Lector de tarjetas SD

El lector de tarjetas SD (referencia: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) es uno de los modelos medianamente rápidos: Las velocidades de transferencia de 76 MB/s (transferencia de 250 imágenes jpg, 5 MB por archivo) y 87 MB/s (copia de grandes bloques de datos) pueden calificarse de aceptables. El Razer Blade 16 demuestra que es posible alcanzar cifras significativamente superiores.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +125%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=92, last 2 years)
94.8 MB/s +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
76 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
71 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
118.4 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s -5%

Comunicación

En condiciones óptimas (sin dispositivos Wi-Fi cerca, corta distancia entre el portátil y el PC servidor) se pueden alcanzar velocidades de datos de buenas a excelentes; un chip WiFi 6E (Intel AX211) lo hace posible. Las conexiones por cable las realiza un controlador Gigabit Ethernet de Realtek (RTL8125, 2,5 GBit/s).

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1585 (642min - 1670max) MBit/s +56%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1577 (796min - 1617max) MBit/s +55%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=229)
1238 MBit/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=154, last 2 years)
1230 MBit/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1018 (656min - 1248max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (501min - 571max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1689 (843min - 1714max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (839min - 1716max) MBit/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1650 (1031min - 1711max) MBit/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1604 (1554min - 1623max) MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=229)
1382 MBit/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=155, last 2 years)
1376 MBit/s -19%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (656-1248)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (796-1617)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (601-671)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1564 (642-1670)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1661 (843-1714)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1604 (1554-1623)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1585-1711)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (839-1716)

Cámara web

La cámara web (2,1 MP) ofrece una calidad media y es compatible con Windows Hello. Además de eso, hay un obturador mecánico.

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24): 8.7 ∆E min: 3.45 - max: 13.19 ∆E

Accesorios

El portátil viene con una memoria USB (controladores, instrucciones), pegatinas y una alfombrilla de ratón. Un accesorio opcional viene en forma de refrigeración externa por agua https://www.xmg.gg/xmg-oasis-mk2/ ($230).

Refrigeración externa por agua (Oasis Mk2)
Refrigeración externa por agua (Oasis Mk2)
Refrigeración externa por agua (Oasis Mk2)
Refrigeración externa por agua (Oasis Mk2)
La tubería de agua se fija magnéticamente
La tubería de agua se fija magnéticamente

Mantenimiento

Tras retirar todos los tornillos de la base del aparato, se puede separar la cubierta de la base con la ayuda de una púa o una espátula plana. Esto le da acceso a los bancos de RAM (ambos están ocupados), los ventiladores y la batería. El SSD y las ranuras SSD (PCIe 4, M.2 2280) y el módulo Wi-Fi están cubiertos por placas adicionales atornilladas.

Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Hardware XMG Neo 16 (E24)

Garantía

En la UE, Schenker ofrece una garantía básica de dos años que incluye un servicio de recogida y un servicio de reparación rápida de 6 meses (reparaciones en 48 horas). Una garantía de 36 meses le costará entre unos 100 y 160 dólares - dependiendo del periodo de reparación rápida seleccionado.

Dispositivos de entrada - Un teclado con iluminación individual de las teclas

Teclado

Anteriormente se podía pedir el Neo 16 del año pasado con un teclado mecánico opcional, pero el modelo actual sólo tiene un teclado chiclet. El teclado cubre toda la anchura del portátil y también incorpora un teclado numérico e iluminación individual de las teclas (RGB). Las teclas cóncavas y curvadas ofrecen un recorrido medio, un punto de presión bien definido y una resistencia muy agradable. El teclado no se flexiona al escribir. Lo que sí llama la atención es lo cómodas que resultan de utilizar las teclas de flecha descentradas y de tamaño normal, una mejora respecto al modelo del año pasado.

Panel táctil

Una alternativa al ratón es el clickpad multitáctil (de unos 12,3 x 7,7 cm), cuyas superficies lisas facilitan al máximo los gestos de deslizamiento. Ofrece un recorrido corto y un punto de presión definido.

Teclado XMG Neo 16 (E24)
Teclado XMG Neo 16 (E24)

Pantalla - Schenker ha optado por un brillante panel IPS

A la pantalla instalada de 16 pulgadas (2.560 x 1.600 píxeles) no le falta nada en cuanto a brillo (~ 500 cd/m²), pero el contraste (1.000:1) podría ser mayor. En lo que respecta a esta área, el Blade 16 El panel OLED ofrece un mejor conjunto global: gracias a su diseño, proporciona unos valores de negro y un contraste maravillosos. En general, las cifras alcanzadas por el Neo 16 son más que suficientes para poder utilizar el dispositivo en interiores. En exteriores, la pantalla es legible, siempre que el sol no sea demasiado brillante. Algunos aspectos positivos son que el panel 16:10, 240 Hz (IPS, G-Sync) de gran capacidad de respuesta y ángulo de visión estable no muestra ningún signo de parpadeo PWM, independientemente del ajuste de brillo. No dispone de opciones de visualización alternativas.

Subpíxeles
Subpíxeles
Sangrado ligero
Sangrado ligero
Al aire libre
Al aire libre
Ángulo de visión
Ángulo de visión
517
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
BOE NE160QDM-NZA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 530 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 497.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: 1000:1 (Negro: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.226
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
26%
-1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.2
99.1
41%
68.1
-3%
67.3
-4%
sRGB Coverage
98
99.9
2%
99.5
2%
96.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.6
95.6
35%
69
-2%
68.9
-2%
Response Times
95%
-20%
-49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
11.2 ?(5.2, 6)
0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09)
98%
11.7 ?(5.7, 6)
-4%
14.5 ?(7.1, 7.4)
-29%
Response Time Black / White *
5.1 ?(1.6, 3.5)
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
92%
6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1)
-35%
8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7)
-69%
PWM Frequency
960
Screen
251%
25%
15%
Brightness middle
530
418
-21%
422
-20%
372
-30%
Brightness
497
420
-15%
388
-22%
349
-30%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
87
2%
88
4%
Black Level *
0.53
0.02
96%
0.42
21%
0.32
40%
Contrast
1000
20900
1990%
1005
1%
1163
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.21
1.07
67%
1.42
56%
2.06
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
4.04
30%
1.97
66%
3
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.44
1.07
26%
0.7
51%
1.5
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
1.12
73%
1.2
71%
1.9
55%
Gamma
2.226 99%
2.29 96%
2.078 106%
2.312 95%
CCT
6448 101%
6417 101%
6581 99%
6747 96%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
124% / 181%
1% / 13%
-12% / 2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Desde el primer momento, la pantalla ofrece una reproducción del color decente: Con una DeltaE de 3,2, la desviación apenas roza el valor objetivo (DeltaE < 3). Un calibrado lo reduce a 1,44, una buena cifra. De todos los espacios de color estándar (AdobeRGB, sRGB, DCI P3) el panel -al igual que el Erazer Beast X40 pantalla - sólo puede mostrar el espacio sRGB casi por completo. La visualización de los tres espacios de color está reservada al panel OLED que se encuentra en el Blade 16.

El perfil de color que hemos creado puede descargarse y utilizarse gratuitamente. Encontrará un enlace en el cuadro de información de la pantalla.

CalMAN: Escamas grises
CalMAN: Escamas grises
CalMAN: Saturación del color
CalMAN: Saturación del color
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escalas de grises (calibradas)
CalMAN: Escalas de grises (calibradas)
CalMAN: Saturación de color (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturación de color (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs DCI P3
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs DCI P3

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
5.1 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 1.6 ms subida
↘ 3.5 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 13 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
11.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5.2 ms subida
↘ 6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 21 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (33.1 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 17221 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 3846000) Hz.

100 % de luminosidad
100 % de luminosidad
75 % de luminosidad
75 % de luminosidad
50 % de luminosidad
50 % de luminosidad
25 % de luminosidad
25 % de luminosidad
0 % de luminosidad
0 % de luminosidad

Rendimiento - Raptor Lake y Ada Lovelace aseguran una tonelada de potencia

El Neo 16 (Early 24) está dirigido a jugadores, creadores y, en general, a todos los grupos de usuarios que requieren mucha potencia. Todas las variantes de especificaciones están equipadas con un Core i9 14900HX y la paleta de GPU oscila entre RTX 4060 y RTX 4090 - nuestro modelo es una RTX 4090. Las configuraciones individuales y la compra del portátil son posibles a través de Bestware.com (alemán). El modelo de prueba que tenemos aquí puede adquirirse por unos 4.000 dólares, mientras que el modelo básico (RTX 4060) cuesta aproximadamente 2.000 dólares. La refrigeración por agua disponible opcionalmente (Oasis MK2) se incluye con los modelos RTX 4080 o RTX 4090 Neo 16.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Información del sistema Nvidia
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Condiciones de la prueba

Puede elegir entre tres modos de rendimiento específicos del fabricante (véase la tabla). Durante la prueba, utilizamos los modos "Overboost" (puntos de referencia) y "Equilibrado" (prueba de batería). El modo GPU se configuró en "Híbrido" (= Optimus). Puede gestionar perfiles individuales a través del Centro de Control. Esto significa que puede ajustar el límite de potencia de la CPU, el TGP de la GPU y/o el límite superior de temperatura. Una tecla independiente (junto al botón de encendido) permite cambiar rápidamente entre los modos.

Teníamos a nuestra disposición la refrigeración por agua externa disponible opcionalmente (Oasis Mk2), pero no la utilizamos durante las pruebas. No obstante, realizamos algunas mediciones independientes de las pruebas oficiales (véase la tabla comparativa).

Sobrealimentación Entusiasta Equilibrada
Límite de potencia 1 (HWInfo) 205 vatios 205 vatios 205 vatios
Límite de potencia 2 (HWInfo) 205 vatios 205 vatios 205 vatios
Ruido (Witcher 3) 54 dB(A) 51 dB(A) 32 dB(A)
Rendimiento (Witcher 3) 214fps 198fps 30fps (bloqueo)
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control
Centro de control

Procesador

El portátil está alimentado por un Core i9 14900HX (Raptor Lake) - otras CPU no están disponibles. El Core i9 ofrece un total de 24 núcleos (8P + 16E = 32 hilos) a una velocidad máxima de 5,8 GHz (P) y 4,1 GHz (E). La carga continua de varios hilos (bucle CB15) produce un rendimiento continuo pero ligeramente decreciente (Overboost) - el uso de la refrigeración por agua Oasis contrarresta este efecto. Los otros dos modos de potencia garantizan un rendimiento constante incluso sin la refrigeración por agua - por supuesto, en un nivel bajo.

"Overboost" ofrece cifras de CPU por encima de la media y "Enthusiast" está ligeramente por debajo de la media - esto se aplica sobre todo al rendimiento multihilo. En cada uno de los tres perfiles, el rendimiento monohilo está a un nivel similarmente alto. La refrigeración por agua opcional (Oasis) se traduce en un pequeño aumento del rendimiento.

Multihilo (PSU)
Multihilo (PSU)
Monohilo (batería)
Monohilo (batería)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D: Ø5282 (5177.32-5599.89)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4121 (3925.8-4598.23)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost, Oasis: Ø5559 (5506.61-5589.71)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4469 (4358.72-4684.94)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4439 (4357.3-4809.43)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)
Bucle CB15 (Sobrealimentación)
Bucle CB15 (Sobrealimentación)
CB15 loop (Entusiasta)
CB15 loop (Entusiasta)
Bucle CB15 (Balanceado)
Bucle CB15 (Balanceado)
Bucle CB15 (Overboost, Oasis)
Bucle CB15 (Overboost, Oasis)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
81.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
79.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
76.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
75.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
75.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
69.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
60.4 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
51 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
36200 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31889 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31109 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30411 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=32)
29105 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
29082 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22238 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=202, last 2 years)
21371 Points -41%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -49%
Single Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2227 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
2205 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2193 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=32)
2159 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2076 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2039 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
1935 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=200, last 2 years)
1870 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1720 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -27%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
13832 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
13033 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11960 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11637 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11604 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=32)
11078 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11010 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8495 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=200, last 2 years)
8128 Points -41%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -49%
CPU (Single Core)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
855 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
847 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
839 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=32)
827 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
797 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
780 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
755 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 855, n=200, last 2 years)
720 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
657 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -26%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 (5177.32min - 5599.89max) Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
5589 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4879 (4505.52min - 4878.64max) Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4809 (4357.3min - 4809.43max) Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4685 (4358.72min - 4684.94max) Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4598 (3925.8min - 4598.23max) Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=33)
4454 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=206, last 2 years)
3355 Points -36%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3263 Points -38%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
318 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
316 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=32)
307 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
289 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=203, last 2 years)
276 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
247 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -23%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -87%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=195, last 2 years)
173.5 Seconds * -83%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
143 Seconds * -51%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=32)
119.9 Seconds * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
117 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
110 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106 Seconds * -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
95 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
91 Seconds * +4%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
136645 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
136201 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125676 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122148 MIPS -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121465 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
115262 MIPS -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=32)
112226 MIPS -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
92386 MIPS -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=199, last 2 years)
83503 MIPS -38%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -50%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
7573 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7442 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
7441 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7340 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7070 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=32)
7019 MIPS -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6931 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=199, last 2 years)
6258 MIPS -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5452 MIPS -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -39%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
19665 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
19451 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18590 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17559 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17499 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=32)
17359 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
15849 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=107, last 2 years)
14185 Points -27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
12825 Points -34%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3129 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
3109 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3077 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=32)
2981 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2964 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2916 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=107, last 2 years)
2647 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2419 Points -23%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
2199 Points -30%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
23194 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21642 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21335 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21075 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20510 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
19875 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=32)
19482 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17082 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=201, last 2 years)
14667 Points -36%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -45%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2210 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
2210 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2168 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2133 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=32)
2096 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2049 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2012 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=201, last 2 years)
1872 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1729 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
38.9 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
36.4 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
32.2 fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.7 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=32)
29.7 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23.7 fps -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=199, last 2 years)
23 fps -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -41%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.6 s * -63%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
47.9 s * -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=196, last 2 years)
47.9 s * -46%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
47.5 s * -44%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.3.4.2)
45.9 s * -40%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=32)
43.5 s * -32%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
42.8 s * -30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
40.6 s * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
39 s * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
37.3 s * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
32.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost, Oasis)
31.4 s * +5%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4859 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=200, last 2 years)
0.4411 sec * -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
0.4127 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.401 sec * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=32)
0.3838 sec * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
0.3826 sec * -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.375 sec * -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3717 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3699 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec *

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
5267 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
281 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
310 Points
ayuda
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
65.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
60.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
49.2 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
47.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
53908 KRay/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
33474 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
30829 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
27535 KRay/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
27200 KRay/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
26280 KRay/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25682 KRay/s -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=31)
25090 KRay/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
22497 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=196, last 2 years)
21326 KRay/s -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20114 KRay/s -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18676 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
222115 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
166040 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
150728 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136486 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
135707 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
127908 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
125593 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=31)
125566 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
115346 Points -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=196, last 2 years)
105186 Points -30%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
103901 Points -31%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
96463 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
9582 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
7979 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7588 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7000 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6705 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6666 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=31)
6208 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6188 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6112 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4905 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=196, last 2 years)
4791 MB/s -37%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4534 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
181270 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
148966 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
148609 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
144073 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=31)
138558 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
138473 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
135672 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
134965 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
132613 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
130803 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=196, last 2 years)
115680 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
94794 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
29487 Points +63%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
18517 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18114 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16268 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16108 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15857 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15447 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=31)
15374 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14811 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13541 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=196, last 2 years)
13058 Points -28%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11095 Points -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
118813 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
83662 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
76668 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
68467 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
67013 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64437 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64134 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=31)
61842 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
55564 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=196, last 2 years)
53051 Points -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50393 Points -34%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
48020 Points -37%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
328679 MB/s +126%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
226181 MB/s +56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
210913 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
152317 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
145389 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=31)
138479 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
133395 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
128778 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
122937 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=196, last 2 years)
109429 MB/s -25%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
99333 MB/s -32%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88763 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
2292 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
2239 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
2043 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
2043 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1936 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1863 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1861 MB/s -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=31)
1814 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1772 MB/s -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1443 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=196, last 2 years)
1331 MB/s -41%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1298 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
29140 KRay/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
18349 KRay/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16655 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14791 KRay/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
14508 KRay/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14033 KRay/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13993 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=31)
13520 KRay/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12069 KRay/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=196, last 2 years)
11487 KRay/s -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10990 KRay/s -34%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10078 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
54702 MPixel/s +11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
53242 MPixel/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50637 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49769 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49616 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
49399 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49305 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49089 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
48753 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=31)
46434 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=197, last 2 years)
39398 MPixel/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
36406 MPixel/s -26%

Rendimiento del sistema

La lista de especificaciones ya lo delata: No hay escasez de potencia de cálculo - no menos importante, lo confirman las muy buenas puntuaciones PCMark. Los juegos, el streaming y el renderizado deberían ser las principales áreas operativas de este veloz ordenador. Las velocidades de transferencia de la RAM están en un nivel normal para una RAM DDR5 5600.

La RAM funciona en modo de doble canal.
La RAM funciona en modo de doble canal.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9117 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8963 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (8230 - 9234, n=11)
8727 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
8374 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8158 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=176, last 2 years)
7751 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7703 Points -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11617 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11561 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10871 - 11628, n=11)
11176 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11091 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
10972 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
10871 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=175, last 2 years)
10823 Points -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
11759 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10881 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9951 - 11759, n=11)
10764 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=175, last 2 years)
9873 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9837 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9089 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6662 Points -43%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
16348 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
16027 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
15287 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (13219 - 16462, n=11)
15032 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
14764 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14614 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=175, last 2 years)
11940 Points -22%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2144 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1877 - 2344, n=10)
2119 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2113 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2086 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2037 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=160, last 2 years)
1889 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points -32%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2070 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1738 - 2162, n=10)
1968 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1957 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1948 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1874 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=160, last 2 years)
1793 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points -27%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2430 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2415 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2195 - 2660, n=10)
2387 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2327 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2323 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=160, last 2 years)
2069 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points -40%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1874 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1478 - 2327, n=10)
1862 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1756 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1750 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=160, last 2 years)
1691 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1649 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
480 Points +43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
331 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
326 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (279 - 339, n=9)
324 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
310 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=176, last 2 years)
302 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
266 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -29%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
328 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
308 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
304 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
295 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (246 - 309, n=7)
294 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
269 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=164, last 2 years)
264 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -39%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=189, last 2 years)
508 ms * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
500 ms * -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (428 - 535, n=10)
454 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
453 ms * -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
443 ms * -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
437 ms * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
421.3 ms * +2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

PCMark 10 Score
9017 puntos
ayuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
78885 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78589 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78367 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77961 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77217 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=31)
74509 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=196, last 2 years)
63973 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50335 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87507 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86932 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86790 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85340 MB/s -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84390 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=31)
80589 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=196, last 2 years)
67713 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59921 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77688 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77444 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77302 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76779 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s -3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71877 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=31)
71600 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=196, last 2 years)
65722 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58774 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -87%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=196, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.6 ns * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 ns * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.4 ns * -12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=31)
84.9 ns * -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.9 ns * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
79.9 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns *

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Latencias del CPD

La prueba estandarizada Latency Monitor (navegación por Internet, reproducción de vídeo 4k, Prime95 a alta carga) reveló algunas anomalías. El sistema no parece adecuado para la edición de vídeo y audio en tiempo real. Las futuras actualizaciones de software podrían afectar a este aspecto.

Monitor de latencia
Monitor de latencia
Monitor de latencia
Monitor de latencia
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5340 μs * -115%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * +44%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1305.5 μs * +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1100.8 μs * +56%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Almacenamiento masivo

Como es habitual, Schenker ofrece a los clientes una amplia selección de unidades SSD en su tienda en línea - hay espacio para dos en el interior del Neo. Se ofrece compatibilidad con RAID 0/1. La unidad SSD Samsung del dispositivo de análisis (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2 2280) ofrece buenas velocidades de transferencia. Una característica positiva es la ausencia de estrangulamiento térmico.

Hay espacio para dos unidades SSD PCIe 4.
Hay espacio para dos unidades SSD PCIe 4.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7108 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6863 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 805.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 570.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3277 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 75.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 284.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.2 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
83.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
61.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
55.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=177, last 2 years)
3515 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=16)
3256 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3238 (3056.39min - 3237.58max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2945 (2911.9min - 2945.45max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2570 (2552.37min - 2570.06max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=16)
4843 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3940 (3577.56min - 3940.13max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=177, last 2 years)
3809 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2991 (2423.86min - 2991.17max) MB/s -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1690 (1454.82min - 1690.3max) MB/s -65%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7011 - 7148, n=16)
7098 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6971 (6127.67min - 6971.35max) MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
6929 (6183.66min - 6928.97max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6551 (5445.88min - 6551.19max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=177, last 2 years)
6371 MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=16)
6810 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5740 (5704.67min - 5740.32max) MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=177, last 2 years)
4843 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4562 (4255.12min - 4561.93max) MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2382 (920.86min - 2382.42max) MB/s -65%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 97.7, n=16)
76.2 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=177, last 2 years)
66.3 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
54.5 (53.38min - 54.47max) MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
54.3 (54.23min - 54.34max) MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.8 (49.12min - 49.75max) MB/s -18%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
324 (322.91min - 324.37max) MB/s +86%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=16)
237 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=177, last 2 years)
220 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
183.8 (182.06min - 183.78max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
119.3 (117.59min - 119.29max) MB/s -32%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3653 (3636.8min - 3652.63max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=16)
3372 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=177, last 2 years)
2582 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1350 (1194.53min - 1349.82max) MB/s -73%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1331 (1250.04min - 1330.81max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3447 (3336.65min - 3446.75max) MB/s -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=16)
2629 MB/s -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=177, last 2 years)
2114 MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
730 (694.74min - 729.67max) MB/s -84%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
601 (540.73min - 601.05max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8462 Points -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=16)
8262 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=168, last 2 years)
6750 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6546 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5751 Points -39%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3033 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=16)
2909 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=168, last 2 years)
2451 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1890 Points -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1689 Points -52%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4073 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=16)
3976 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3948 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=168, last 2 years)
3111 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3007 Points -26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points -32%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5739 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5459.84 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=16)
5176 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=168, last 2 years)
4952 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4823 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s -23%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=16)
4751 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3972 MB/s -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3914.76 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=168, last 2 years)
3725 MB/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2496 MB/s -56%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
82.84 MB/s +40%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (59.3 - 85.3, n=16)
71.6 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=168, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
56 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.34 MB/s -17%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
237.11 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=16)
221 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=168, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
192.1 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
149.1 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2404.46 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3164, n=16)
2267 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=168, last 2 years)
1885 MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1358 MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1059 MB/s -64%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3484 MB/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3319.37 MB/s +2%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 3975, n=16)
3287 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2608 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=168, last 2 years)
2531 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.085 ms * -254%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.062 ms * -158%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.057 ms * -138%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=167, last 2 years)
0.05409 ms * -125%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=16)
0.03481 ms * -45%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=168, last 2 years)
0.0484 ms * -203%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.024 ms * -50%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=16)
0.02025 ms * -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.019 ms * -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.016 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms *

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Continuous Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7118 (6337.06-7142.46)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5414 (3853.78-6701.45)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6943 (5621.29-6984.69)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6593 (4837.89-6648.18)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6442 (5614.61-6552.24)

Tarjeta gráfica

Actualmente, la GeForce RTX 4090 ofrece el mayor rendimiento entre las GPU móviles de Nvidia. 9.728 sombreadores, un bus de 256 bits, así como una rápida memoria RAM GDDR6 (16.384 MB) caracterizan al acelerador de píxeles. El TGP máximo se sitúa en 175 vatios (150 vatios + 25 vatios de Dynamic Boost): más no es posible.

Los resultados del benchmark están por encima (Overboost) y por debajo (Enthusiast, Balanced) de la media de la RTX 4090 hasta ahora. La refrigeración por agua Oasis ayuda a conseguir un pequeño aumento del rendimiento. En cualquier caso, la principal competidora, la Blade 16se mantiene a distancia. El cambio entre la dGPU y Optimus no requiere un reinicio: Optimus avanzado es compatible.

Time Spy (PSU, Sobrealimentación)
Time Spy (PSU, Sobrealimentación)
Time Spy (Batería, Sobrealimentación)
Time Spy (Batería, Sobrealimentación)
Time Spy (PSU, Overboost, Oasis)
Time Spy (PSU, Overboost, Oasis)
Time Spy (PSU, Entusiasta)
Time Spy (PSU, Entusiasta)
Time Spy (PSU, Equilibrado)
Time Spy (PSU, Equilibrado)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
97.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
92.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
90.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
80.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
72178 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
72070 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
65956 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=41)
65171 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64540 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64341 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
64166 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
62862 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58713 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=196, last 2 years)
43147 Points -38%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
50743 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
49422 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
48556 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46527 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=39)
46366 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
45696 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44366 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43518 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41431 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=205, last 2 years)
30993 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
22717 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
22529 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
21353 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21279 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=41)
20972 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20806 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20416 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19878 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18954 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=200, last 2 years)
12867 Points -42%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
62889 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
43829 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
38597 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
20588 puntos
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
5102 puntos
ayuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=187, last 2 years)
21.4 Seconds * -65%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
13 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=38)
12.1 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
12 Seconds * +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
12 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
12 Seconds * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
11 Seconds * +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
11 Seconds * +15%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=193, last 2 years)
37.3 Seconds * -119%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=38)
18.3 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
18 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
16 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
305 Seconds * -83%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
300 Seconds * -80%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
253 Seconds * -51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
205 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
202 Seconds * -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 305, n=38)
198.6 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
198 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
193 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
187 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
167 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
155 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
150 Seconds * +10%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
237138 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
228074 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
221004 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
204326 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
201625 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (6841 - 237138, n=38)
200843 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
196962 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190565 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
170505 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
170225 Points -25%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
163242 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=201, last 2 years)
125809 Points -45%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
163089 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
154063 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
148841 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
133971 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
119323 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
117457 Points -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (49663 - 163089, n=27)
103239 Points -37%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
82123 Points -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=126, last 2 years)
71707 Points -56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
63400 Points -61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
52951 Points -68%
Geekbench 6.2
GPU Vulkan 6.2
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
178909 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
178630 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
164105 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
157614 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
149336 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
148584 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9584 - 196201, n=17)
139552 Points -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
115199 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
110302 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=103, last 2 years)
82313 Points -50%
GPU OpenCL
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
207373 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
199154 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
192262 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
190820 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
190540 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (159127 - 209521, n=19)
187102 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
167047 Points -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
157282 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
153327 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=106, last 2 years)
116318 Points -39%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
3744 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
3715 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
3588 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1982 - 3824, n=29)
3476 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
3424 mpaths -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
2653 mpaths -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=117, last 2 years)
2158 mpaths -40%
GPU CUDA
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
2710 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
2708 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
2603 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1454 - 2797, n=29)
2537 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
2489 mpaths -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
1967 mpaths -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=119, last 2 years)
1553 mpaths -40%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
25424 mpaths +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
24595 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
23364 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (12404 - 25897, n=27)
20296 mpaths -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15489 mpaths -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=126, last 2 years)
14755 mpaths -37%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
12388 mpaths -47%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
1334 mpaths +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
1317 mpaths +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1296 mpaths
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (v4.10.07 )
1276 mpaths -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1258 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (873 - 1334, n=29)
1213 mpaths -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1191 mpaths -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1170 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1036 mpaths -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
873 mpaths -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=158, last 2 years)
689 mpaths -47%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (v4.10.07 )
37621 ksamples +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
37055 ksamples +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
36438 ksamples
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
31870 ksamples -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
30971 ksamples -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
30073 ksamples -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (18206 - 37629, n=29)
29728 ksamples -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
29082 ksamples -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
29032 ksamples -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23314 ksamples -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=158, last 2 years)
21100 ksamples -42%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Rendimiento en juegos

El ordenador XMG está diseñado para manejar juegos QHD con los ajustes máximos. Las frecuencias de cuadro están por encima de la media para la RTX 4090 (Overboost) y la refrigeración por agua aumenta ligeramente el rendimiento. Las funciones de la GPU, Frame Generation y DLSS 3, permitirían resoluciones más altas con los ajustes máximos y con trazado de rayos, aunque sólo con juegos que ofrezcan estas características.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
84.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.8 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
214 (181min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
214 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
210 (170min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
207 fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
204 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
203.4 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
200 (174min) fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
200 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (139.2 - 216, n=35)
198.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
185.6 (170min, 170.31P1) fps -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
166.3 (154min) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=179, last 2 years)
125.6 fps -41%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
167.7 (1.87min, 111.1P1) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
163 (4.23min, 125P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148.2 (7.32min, 100P1) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
143.6 (4.39min, 100P1) fps -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.5 (3.53min, 100P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139 (6.45min, 100P1) fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.1 - 167.7, n=39)
138.9 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.1 (4.19min, 83.3P1) fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.2 (0.938min, 111.1P1) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=181, last 2 years)
112.6 fps -29%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, Oasis)
201 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
196.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
184.9 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
181.2 fps -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
181.1 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
180 fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
178 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (122.2 - 201, n=39)
173.4 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
165.1 fps -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
139.8 fps -29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
137.5 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=193, last 2 years)
118.2 fps -40%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
420 (64.7min, 302P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, Oasis)
415 (139.4min, 305P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
384 (116.1min, 281P1) fps -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
371 (5min, 273P1) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
369 (5min, 269P1) fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
359.8 (30.2min, 253P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 421, n=38)
357 fps -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
347 (87.7min, 252P1) fps -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
337 (16.7min, 246P1) fps -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=192, last 2 years)
224 fps -44%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
220 (175min) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
193.3 (166.3min) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.9 (162.8min) fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
188.1 (155.2min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
182.6 (154.9min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
182.1 (154.2min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
177.4 (149.3min) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (115.7 - 220, n=41)
176.2 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164.5 (136min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=200, last 2 years)
148.5 fps -24%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -32%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
166.2 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
143.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
141.3 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
139.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.4 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (77.8 - 166.2, n=45)
130.5 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=208, last 2 years)
106.5 fps -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps -38%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
96.8 (61.1min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
93.8 (53.7min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.4 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 103.9, n=17)
90.1 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.5 (56.4min) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.12)
86 (70.4min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.39 (67.14min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
77.6 (64min) fps -17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.4 (25.4min) fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 103.9, n=61, last 2 years)
61.8 fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142.8 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
133.1 (56.2min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
131.5 (62.2min) fps
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.12)
127 (70.6min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
123.1 (100.1min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.1 - 144.7, n=17)
122.4 fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
118.9 (49.7min) fps -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
99.7 (13.5min) fps -24%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=76, last 2 years)
86.3 fps -34%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
77.7 (39.8min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.5 (49.8min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (65.5 - 77.7, n=10)
72.5 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
68.3 (47.6min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
62.4 (54.1min) fps -17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
58.4 (15.2min) fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=53, last 2 years)
45.5 fps -40%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
127 (78min, 90P1) fps
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
120 (77min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1118244)
113.6 (14min, 69P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88 - 127, n=4)
112.2 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=13, last 2 years)
75.6 fps -40%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
79 (63min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58.5 - 84.7, n=4)
73.6 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1118244)
72.1 (2min, 56P1) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=10, last 2 years)
52.9 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
129.5 (76min, 87P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88.3 - 129.5, n=2)
108.9 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years)
78.4 fps -39%
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.8 (51min, 56.6P0.1, 64.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (74 - 78.8, n=2)
76.4 fps -3%
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74 (31.1min, 50.5P0.1, 62.7P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.4 - 78.8, n=4, last 2 years)
52 fps -34%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
57.3 (43min, 46.4P0.1, 50.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (51.8 - 57.3, n=2)
54.6 fps -5%
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51.8 (36.2min, 41.4P0.1, 46.1P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.3 - 57.3, n=2, last 2 years)
45.3 fps -21%
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.1 (40.3min, 63.5P0.1, 72.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
83.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (47.8 - 83.1, n=2, last 2 years)
65.5 fps -21%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.2 (73.2min, 82.8P0.1, 91.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 125.2, n=3)
100 fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 125.2, n=10, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -47%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98 (65.7min, 67.6P0.1, 76.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 98, n=3)
79.7 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 98, n=9, last 2 years)
57.1 fps -42%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.9 (28.2min, 84.5P0.1, 113.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (141 - 189.9, n=2)
165.5 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 189.9, n=6, last 2 years)
126.3 fps -33%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133.6 (25.7min, 66.5P0.1, 87.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (99 - 133.6, n=2)
116.3 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years)
91.6 fps -31%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
123.3 (50.5min, 68.4P0.1, 84.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (108.6 - 124.7, n=6)
118.1 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
108.6 (26.3P0.1, 67P1) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -43%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.1 (51.7min, 55.3P0.1, 66.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (78.4 - 87.1, n=6)
82.9 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.4 (17P0.1, 52.8P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 87.1, n=13, last 2 years)
62 fps -29%
1920x1080 High Preset + High Ray Tracing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (60.3 - 70.3, n=2)
65.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60.3 (38.8min, 40.2P0.1, 46.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (42.9 - 60.3, n=2, last 2 years)
51.6 fps -14%

Utilizamos Witcher 3 para comprobar la estabilidad de la tasa de imágenes por segundo: El juego (ajustes máximos, FHD) funcionó durante aproximadamente 1 hora, el personaje del juego no se movió y no observamos ningún bajón en la tasa de imágenes por segundo.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø204 (195-211)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø192.6 (177-211)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø190.8 (167-207)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø205 (192-219)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Overboost, Oasis: Ø206 (193-218)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø196 (185-206)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø154.7 (132-167)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø178.8 (173-185)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø195.6 (67-209)
Witcher 3 (Sobrealimentación)
Witcher 3 (Sobrealimentación)
Witcher 3 (Overboost, Oasis)
Witcher 3 (Overboost, Oasis)
bajo medio alto ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.6 187.4 185.7 159.3 156
The Witcher 3 (2015) 643 562.3 412.7 214 169.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 248 221 210 194.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 233 225 196.9 162.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 208 184.2 144.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 194 184 172 156
Strange Brigade (2018) 579 444 397 403 305
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 168.5 157.8 138 131.5 93.8
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 128.5 128 123.3 87.1
Alone in the Dark (2024) 219 217 216 189.9 133.6
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 165.4 160.5 126.2 125.2 98
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 122.3 103.3 78.8 57.3
F1 24 (2024) 346 369 302 127 84.7

Emisiones - El portátil XMG tiene emisiones específicas de su clase

Emisiones sonoras

Son posibles niveles de ruido de hasta 56 dB(A) pero, cuando se juega, esta cifra es ligeramente inferior (Overboost). Se puede conseguir un nivel de ruido significativamente inferior utilizando "Equilibrado", a expensas del rendimiento. El juego sería posible. En el uso diario (oficina, Internet) y en funcionamiento en reposo, el ordenador suele realizar su trabajo en silencio, independientemente del modo de rendimiento activo.

El uso de la refrigeración externa por agua provoca cierta producción de ruido: La bomba funciona muy silenciosamente y los ventiladores son mucho más perceptibles. Visto subjetivamente, encontramos que el nivel de ruido utilizando la refrigeración externa por agua es más agradable pero no necesariamente más silencioso.

De vez en cuando, se emiten crujidos electrónicos desde el interior del portátil, por ejemplo, durante la prueba Diskspd. Presumiblemente, esto se debe a la unidad SSD.

Ruido

Ocioso
28 / 29 / 31 dB(A)
Carga
51 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.535.635.738.135.52532.333.531.232.833.93144.344.642.844.1424029.928.126.127.831.95039.222.923.320.533.26336.22827.226.435.78033.320.419.817.435.31004627.323.721.531.412530.921.120.218.429.216029.620.121.219.230.620030.623.722.722.232.725031.621.922.419.133.531531.119.21917.534.540033.519.417.91637.350035.819.218.315.538.363036.919.716.913.439.980037.917.816.11242.1100038.818.715.713.242.4125041.519.716.312.845.3160041.719.315.91445.8200041.518.617.513.345.9250041.517.515.312.845.5315041.316.515.513.146.1400039.217.616.813.243.8500037.415.214.61341.4630036.814.116.713.543.2800032.114.615.813.938.51000029.814.915.914.436.61250027.515.916.11334.61600022.31515.112.529.1SPL51.43028.625.955.7N7.81.31.10.810.3median 36.8median 18.7median 16.7median 13.5median 38.5Delta4.52.11.325.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Noise
14%
3%
3%
-12%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
25
4%
23
12%
25
4%
Idle Minimum *
28
23
18%
28
-0%
23
18%
31
-11%
Idle Average *
29
23
21%
29
-0%
27.7
4%
33
-14%
Idle Maximum *
31
27.66
11%
32
-3%
34.7
-12%
42
-35%
Load Average *
51
43.76
14%
48
6%
53.4
-5%
58
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
46.81
13%
50
7%
53.4
1%
57
-6%
Load Maximum *
56
50.37
10%
52
7%
53.4
5%
59
-5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Temperatura

El portátil se calienta notablemente bajo carga (prueba de estrés y prueba Witcher 3 ): En algunas zonas, las temperaturas superan a veces los 50 °C. Sin embargo, en el reposamanos, las temperaturas se mantienen en un nivel moderado. En el uso diario (oficina, Internet), las cifras se sitúan en la zona verde.

La prueba Witcher 3 pone de manifiesto el efecto de la refrigeración por agua opcional: La temperatura de la GPU difiere en unos 17 °C (80,7 °C frente a 63,4 °C).

 45 °C47 °C46 °C 
 44 °C45 °C44 °C 
 29 °C31 °C30 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C
54 °C55 °C56 °C
50 °C50 °C44 °C
29 °C31 °C34 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 44.8 °C
Conector de corriente  57 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
-7%
8%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
45
4%
47
-0%
40.1
15%
50
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
56
45
20%
54
4%
46.7
17%
51
9%
Idle Upper Side *
27
29
-7%
30
-11%
26.5
2%
28
-4%
Idle Bottom *
27
30
-11%
32
-19%
27.7
-3%
26
4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Prueba de esfuerzo

El escenario extremo de la prueba de estrés (Prime95 y Furmark en funcionamiento continuo) comprueba la estabilidad del sistema a plena carga. La velocidad de la CPU cae en el primer minuto de la prueba de unos 4,3 a 4,5 GHz (P) y de 3,5 a 3,6 GHz (E) a 2,5 GHz (P) y 2,3 GHz (E). Al mismo tiempo, la velocidad de la GPU aumenta de un punto de partida de 1.600 MHz a más de 2.000 MHz.

Furmark y Prime95
Furmark y Prime95
Furmark y Prime95
Furmark y Prime95
Furmark y Prime95
Furmark y Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Altavoces

Los altavoces estéreo carecen de graves. Aparte de eso, en su mayoría producen un sonido decente. Se puede conseguir una mejor calidad utilizando auriculares o altavoces externos.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.136.52532.836.83144.146.54027.830.55020.533.66326.4328017.438.710021.549.812518.447.616019.255.420022.260.825019.163.231517.561.74001664.550015.570.963013.475.28001275.1100013.275.6125012.875.916001475.6200013.373.2250012.873.1315013.174.7400013.273.250001377.8630013.574.9800013.972.71000014.465.3125001360.61600012.555.5SPL25.986.4N0.871.1median 13.5median 72.7Delta27.13032.83030.931.430.935.742.935.723.728.123.726.219.726.231.216.431.245.113.845.145.919.845.951.414.551.45913.95964.117.864.168.614.368.667.19.667.167.68.567.672.97.572.977.47.477.4717.77164.88.164.865.88.265.867.58.867.568.89.868.868.710.568.77010.67066.410.966.467.311.267.36411.56464.711.664.767126763.211.863.25510.75581.222.581.254.70.454.7median 67median 10.7median 673.62.53.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Diagrama de frecuencia en comparación (¡las casillas de verificación se pueden marcar y desmarcar!)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gestión de la energía - El Schenker Neo ofrece una duración decente de la batería

Consumo de energía

El consumo de energía está en un nivel normal para el hardware instalado que tenemos aquí. La prueba Witcher 3 y la prueba de estrés se ejecutaron con un consumo de energía ligeramente decreciente. La fuente de alimentación (330 vatios) tiene un tamaño adecuado.

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 16 / 28 Watt
Carga midlight 130 / 361 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-1%
-23%
-9%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
6
16.9
-182%
7
-17%
15.4
-157%
8
-33%
Idle Average *
16
17.8
-11%
15
6%
21.6
-35%
18
-13%
Idle Maximum *
28
19.6
30%
33
-18%
22.2
21%
28
-0%
Load Average *
130
128
2%
134
-3%
116.7
10%
133
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
302
243
20%
280
7%
262
13%
294
3%
Load Maximum *
361
328
9%
294
19%
327.1
9%
399
-11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø302 (250-321)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø298 (280-349)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.5 (6.12-27.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø194.9 (175.3-205)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø288 (258-296)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø232 (216-240)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø297 (280-309)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø23.4 (21.8-29.1)

Duración de las pilas

En las pruebas Wi-Fi y de vídeo (carga de sitios web con ayuda de un script, así como el breve vídeo Big Buck Bunny (codificación H.264, FHD) en bucle), la máquina de 16 pulgadas logró tiempos de ejecución de 5 horas 50 minutos y 6 horas 58 minutos. En general, se trata de cifras decentes.

La batería ofrece una capacidad de 99,8 Wh.
La batería ofrece una capacidad de 99,8 Wh.
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
10h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 125)
5h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 58min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 02min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Duración de Batería
-11%
7%
-34%
-2%
-7%
Reader / Idle
600
H.264
418
456
9%
302
-28%
349
-17%
WiFi v1.3
350
329
-6%
374
7%
287
-18%
399
14%
Load
122
79
-35%
55
-55%
Witcher 3 ultra
84

Pro

+ pantalla brillante, 16:10, QHD+ (240 Hz, G-Sync)
+ alto rendimiento del sistema
+ dos ranuras SSD (PCIe 4, M.2 2280)
+ RAM intercambiable/ampliable
+ Iluminación RGB individual de las teclas
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Power Delivery
+ carcasa metálica estable
+ Optimus avanzado
+ pasta térmica de metal líquido
+ refrigeración por agua opcional

Contra

- la cobertura del espacio de color podría ser mayor
- emisiones elevadas a plena carga
- crujidos electrónicos interiores ocasionales

Veredicto - Una bola de fuego de gama alta

El XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) fue proporcionado por Schenker.
El XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) fue proporcionado por Schenker.

El Neo 16 cumple lo que promete: El hardware (Core i9, RTX 4090) del extremo superior de la escala de rendimiento permite la edición de vídeo, el renderizado, el streaming y, por supuesto, los juegos QHD. Las altas emisiones esperadas pueden reducirse a un nivel más moderado seleccionando el modo de rendimiento adecuado.

Con el XMG Neo 16 (Early 24), Schenker ofrece bolsas de potencia en un factor de forma compacto.

Quien busque una solución sin compromisos tendrá que recurrir a la refrigeración externa por agua disponible opcionalmente (230 $): Esto ayuda a conseguir un pequeño aumento del rendimiento y a reducir las emisiones. Dicho esto, el portátil queda atado a un lugar fijo.

La pantalla mate de 16 pulgadas y formato 16:10 (2.560 x 1.600 píxeles, sRGB, IPS, 240 Hz) causa en gran medida una buena impresión, siendo su elevado brillo un punto especialmente agradable. Hay cierto margen de mejora en lo que se refiere al contraste, así como a la cobertura del espacio de color. Las dos ranuras SSD (PCIe 4) con soporte RAID 0/1 permiten un montón de espacio de almacenamiento y tiempos de carga cortos.

Una sola carga de batería (99,8 Wh) es suficiente para una autonomía real de unas 6 a 7 horas, cifras decentes. Positivo: La batería se puede cargar a través de un cargador USB-C (100 vatios, 20 V, 5 A) - el puerto TB4 soporta Power Delivery lo que significa que la fuente de alimentación (330 vatios) teóricamente podría quedarse en casa.

Una alternativa podría ser el Razer Blade 16 (2024). Este ordenador ofrece una potencia de cálculo ligeramente inferior pero, a diferencia del Neo, ofrece un mayor contraste y cuenta con una pantalla OLED más vívida.

Precio y disponibilidad

La XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) puede configurarse individualmente y adquirirse en la tienda en línea de Schenker (en alemán) y los precios representan el tipo de cambio dólar/euro en el momento de la prueba. Nuestro modelo de revisión cuesta alrededor de 4.000 dólares. Los modelos básicos (con una RTX 4060) empiezan en unos 2.000 dólares. Schenker ha declarado que estarán disponibles a finales de junio (RTX 4090) y a mediados de julio (RTX 4060/70/80). La refrigeración por agua opcional le hará desembolsar unos 230 dólares.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) - 06/19/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
85 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
85%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
70 / 80 → 87%
Peso
60 / 10-68 → 86%
Battería
68 / 95 → 71%
Pantalla
84%
Rendimiento de juegos
92%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
93%
AI Performance
100%
Temperatura
81 / 95 → 86%
Ruido
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
84%
Cámara
41 / 75 → 55%
Médio
63%
86%
Gaming - media ponderada
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
80.6%
Repairability
65%
Software Updates
22.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 32.2%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Análisis del XMG Neo 16 (Early 24): Toda la potencia de la RTX 4090 en un portátil de juegos compacto
Sascha Mölck, 2024-06-25 (Update: 2024-06-25)