Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis de MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro

Gaming básico. La revisión de 2017 del MSI GE72 es interesante por varios motivos. Primero, la nueva arquitectura de Intel entra en el segmento de portátiles con la Core i7-7700HQ. Por otro lado, el nuevo chip gaming de Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti está a bordo, quedando entre la gama media y la alta. Comprobamos las capacidades gaming del modelo de 17".
MSI GE72 7RE-046 (GE72 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 373.06, Optimus
Memoría
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, monocanal, 1 ranura usada de 2, max. 32 GB
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 127 PPI, N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, Full HD, 120 Hz, lustroso: no
Placa base
HM175
Disco duro
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Schächte: 1x m.2 Typ 2280 (optional NVMe/PCIe) & 1x 2,5 Zoll
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC899 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: auriculares (S/PDIF), Micrófono, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Equipamento de red
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Unidad óptica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 32 x 420 x 288
Battería
51.4 Wh, 4730 mAh Litio-Ion, 6 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p @ 30 fps)
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 4.1 Dynaudio (Nahimic Audio Enhancer), Teclado: Chiclet de SteelSeries, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente de 150W, accesorios: guia de inicio rápido, información de garantía, guía de recuperación, Software: CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, Magix Suite, MS Office 365 (demo), Norton Security (demo), XSplit Gamecaster 1 Jahr Premium , 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.98 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 516 g
Precio
1550 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 v6
 
78 MB/s +200%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s +192%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s +179%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
26 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s -8%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s +211%
Aorus X7 v6
 
87 MB/s +211%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s +202%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
28 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s -1%
217
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
226
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 253 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 229.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 253 cd/m²
Contraste: 1054:1 (Negro: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
Display
-26%
-24%
-1%
-24%
Display P3 Coverage
90.7
60.9
-33%
66.6
-27%
90
-1%
65.1
-28%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
84.2
-16%
84.1
-16%
99.9
0%
83.5
-16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.2
61.2
-28%
61.5
-28%
83.6
-2%
61.1
-28%
Response Times
-13%
-102%
-6%
-99%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27 ?(13, 14)
31 ?(11, 20)
-15%
37 ?(13, 24)
-37%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-4%
38 ?(12, 26)
-41%
Response Time Black / White *
9 ?(6, 3)
10 ?(3, 7)
-11%
24 ?(4, 20)
-167%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-7%
23 ?(5, 18)
-156%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-18%
10%
20%
-16%
Brightness middle
253
343
36%
362
43%
337.2
33%
326
29%
Brightness
230
312
36%
342
49%
315
37%
312
36%
Brightness Distribution
86
80
-7%
87
1%
86
0%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.5
-108%
0.31
-29%
0.308
-28%
0.5
-108%
Contrast
1054
686
-35%
1168
11%
1095
4%
652
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.01
7.33
-46%
4.5
10%
2.96
41%
6.3
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.4
10.79
-4%
9.31
10%
5.45
48%
11.69
-12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.26
7.6
-5%
3.48
52%
2.57
65%
7.37
-2%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.37 93%
CCT
6329 103%
9024 72%
6144 106%
7114 91%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
55
-28%
55
-28%
74.3
-2%
55
-28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
84
-16%
84
-16%
100
0%
83
-17%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-19% / -19%
-39% / -11%
4% / 12%
-46% / -29%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
9 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 3 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 21 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 13 ms subida
↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points -9%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10841
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
63.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
732 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
108.3 fps
ayuda
PCMark 7 Score
5810 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 7 - Score
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5946 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points -29%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
124%
49%
-37%
-86%
Read Seq
540
1499
178%
1156
114%
334.3
-38%
134.6
-75%
Write Seq
495.7
1411
185%
294.9
-41%
319
-36%
130.6
-74%
Read 4k
22.7
44.33
95%
42.7
88%
20.3
-11%
0.602
-97%
Write 4k
112.9
155.5
38%
153.3
36%
42.51
-62%
1.146
-99%
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Sequential Read: 540 MB/s
Sequential Write: 495.7 MB/s
512K Read: 455.1 MB/s
512K Write: 481.4 MB/s
4K Read: 22.7 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 372.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 212.9 MB/s
3DMark Vantage P Result
30690 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
9269 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
69304 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20933 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6959 puntos
ayuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17068 Points +111%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15806 Points +95%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11506 Points +42%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11311 Points +40%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8086 Points
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
55278 Points +103%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
53469 Points +97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
37413 Points +38%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27202 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23591 Points +132%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20656 Points +103%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14904 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14317 Points +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10186 Points
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
109.1 fps +125%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
103.1 (24.3min - 206.9max) fps +113%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
48.5 fps
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
124 fps +144%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
110.1 fps +117%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
79 fps +56%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.8 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
136 fps +140%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
118.9 fps +110%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
87.4 fps +54%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
56.7 fps
bajomedioaltoultraQHD4K
Dirt Rally (2015) 93.4 65.7 57.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 48.7 26.9 17.6
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 60 41 19
Mad Max (2015) 89.7 82.7 28.6
Anno 2205 (2015) 63.7 20.6 24
Fallout 4 (2015) 56 46.2 18.5
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 72.4 62.7 22.4
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 47.8 23.5 17.1
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 92.2 74.4 28.4
Just Cause 3 (2015) 58.9 52.7 22.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 47.4 39.7 17.6
XCOM 2 (2016) 37.7 19 10.3
Far Cry Primal (2016) 53 40 17
The Division (2016) 45 34.9 16.6
Hitman 2016 (2016) 38.4 36.6 16.3
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) 60.4 46.4 21.3
Doom (2016) 68.3 63.8 21.2
Overwatch (2016) 118 71 38.3
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 50.3 45.1 16.2
No Man's Sky (2016) 44.6 22 18.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 38.3 19.7 12.3
FIFA 17 (2016) 130 128 66.1
Mafia 3 (2016) 28.7 9.8
Battlefield 1 (2016) 56.7 50.8 19.8
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 130 117 59.7
Titanfall 2 (2016) 62 56.2 18.7
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 67.4 58.8 27.4
Dishonored 2 (2016) 48.7 39.6 18.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 42.4 26.6 14.4
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 64.5 24.3
For Honor (2017) 66 () 62 () 45 ()
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 106 46.1 40.3 9.8
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 105 50.2 27.9 23
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 112 46.6 29.8 25.8 0
Rocket League (2017) 158 61
Dirt 4 (2017) 74.2 39.2
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 105 74.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 54.1 45.2
F1 2017 (2017) 66 40 16
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 89 31.6 21.8
FIFA 18 (2017) 149 62.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 121 62 43 29 12
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 61.8 36.1 32.9 31 2
ELEX (2017) 102 52.2 41.9 31 19.6 6.6
Destiny 2 (2017) 116 65.5 62.1 51.1 26.1 17.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 77 45 38 28 20 4
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 191 129 67.8 42.4 30.8 18.9
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 115 66 54.7 50.9 30.3 9.7
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 135 75 65 43 19.5 5.7
Fortnite (2018) 61 45.1 28.8 8.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 74 37.1 23.4
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 107 49.5 40.5 28 16.9 6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 77.3 69.9 61.2 45.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 95 47 43 39 25 12
The Crew 2 (2018) 51 44.1
Monster Hunter World (2018) 93 41.2 35.5 27.9
F1 2018 (2018) 146 81 62 37 28 15
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 97 38 31 25 17 8
FIFA 19 (2018) 192 169 157 150 51.3
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 122 62 55 40
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 77 41 31 17
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 35.5 10.2
Hitman 2 (2018) 55.6 39 29.7 23.6
Fallout 76 (2018) 48.4 45.3

Ruido

Ocioso
34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
DVD
40 / dB(A)
Carga
41 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise
-4%
-1%
2%
6%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.4
5%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
34
33
3%
33
3%
31.9
6%
31.4
8%
Idle Average *
35
35
-0%
34
3%
32
9%
31.4
10%
Idle Maximum *
36
40
-11%
35
3%
34
6%
31.5
12%
Load Average *
41
43
-5%
45
-10%
47
-15%
40.9
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
54
-10%
52
-6%
49.4
-1%
46.2
6%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 45.4 °C44.8 °C39 °C 
 45.1 °C45.8 °C38.6 °C 
 40.3 °C39.8 °C28.1 °C 
Máximo: 45.8 °C
Médio: 40.8 °C
34.7 °C38.4 °C45.2 °C
30.5 °C37.5 °C40.4 °C
24.7 °C30.2 °C36.6 °C
Máximo: 45.2 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
Conector de corriente  47.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.3 °C / 104.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.4 °C / -20.5 F).
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat
-3%
-2%
-7%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.8
47.5
-4%
45
2%
50.8
-11%
53.1
-16%
Maximum Bottom *
45.2
54.5
-21%
54.3
-20%
60
-33%
44.9
1%
Idle Upper Side *
31.7
28.6
10%
29.6
7%
27.4
14%
32.9
-4%
Idle Bottom *
29.9
28.8
4%
28.6
4%
28.8
4%
33.4
-12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203237.12541.243.53142.143.54028.531.35027.431.96325.336.58024.438.310023.846.612522.150.916023.755.22002258.525020.860.931518.968.940019.372.850018.376.263018.175.280017.172.910001774125017.477.3160017.182.2200017.682.9250017.883.231501881.1400018.377.2500018.573.3630018.875.4800019.273.81000019.675.51250020.173.81600020.567.9SPL30.491N1.486.8median 18.8median 74Delta1.44.339.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5median 18.4median 56.55.11.15.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE72 7RE-046Asus GL702VM-GC102D
MSI GE72 7RE-046 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14 / 20 / 25 Watt
Carga midlight 82 / 135 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-67%
-28%
-44%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
14
29
-107%
19
-36%
22.6
-61%
15.6
-11%
Idle Average *
20
31
-55%
25
-25%
32.7
-64%
20.2
-1%
Idle Maximum *
25
38
-52%
31
-24%
32.8
-31%
21.4
14%
Load Average *
82
111
-35%
90
-10%
114.7
-40%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
135
253
-87%
193
-43%
167.9
-24%
147
-9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
WiFi Websurfing
3h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 15min
MSI GE72 7RE-046
51.4 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
94 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
76 Wh
Duración de Batería
-1%
27%
16%
35%
H.264
195
233
19%
262
34%
WiFi v1.3
184
182
-1%
247
34%
213
16%
250
36%

Pro

+ Dragon Center con muchas características (ej. control de ventilador)
+ hardware moderno de primera gracias a Kaby Lake y Pascal
+ teclado iluminado muy configurable
+ intercambio de gráfica Optimus
+ panel 120 Hz
+ SSD y HDD

Contra

- marco de display mal fijado en el modelo de pruebas
- raro comportamiento de la frecuencia CPU
- lector de tarjetas al nivel de USB 2.0
- ralentización GPU bajo carga
- sin Thunderbolt 3
- mala batería
MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Alemania.
MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de MSI Alemania.

Aunque al GE72 7RE le falta una certificación para la RV, se le puede considerar un portátil gaming. La nueva Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ofrece mayormente bastante rendimiento para lograr frame rates medio decentes con una resolución de 1,920 x 1,080 pixels y detalles altos.

El rendimiento caerá rápidamente en el rango de 3K y 4K y hará que los títulos exigentes resulten injugables. Sin embargo, los gamers deberían plantearse gastar algo más en una GTX 1060. A la larga, 6 GB de VRAM aguantarán más tiempo que 4 GB y tales dispositivos raramente cuestan más.

En nuestra opinión, la arquitectura Intel Kaby Lake no es espectacular, y sólo mejora ligeramente el rendimiento CPU.

Los que estéis dudando entre un portátil multimedia barato y uno realmente de primera pueden quedar satisfechos con el GE72 7RE.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

MSI GE72 7RE-046 - 12/28/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabado
74 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
78%
Conectividad
57 / 81 → 71%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 83%
Battería
69%
Pantalla
83%
Rendimiento de juegos
90%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
91%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 91%
Ruido
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
75%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Florian Glaser, 2017-01- 8 (Update: 2017-01- 8)