Breve análisis de la tablet Amazon Fire HD 10 (2017)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 |
|
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 426 cd/m²
Contraste: 1121:1 (Negro: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Lenovo Tab 4 10 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad T3 10 IPS, 1280x800, 9.6" | Apple iPad (2017) IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -11% | 0% | 2% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 426 | 489 15% | 316 -26% | 410 -4% | 514 21% |
Brightness | 399 | 443 11% | 305 -24% | 409 3% | 485 22% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 86 -5% | 92 1% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.43 -13% | 0.2 47% | 0.32 16% | 0.46 -21% |
Contrast | 1121 | 1137 1% | 1580 41% | 1281 14% | 1117 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.5 -22% | 5 -11% | 4.5 -0% | 1.4 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 11.6 -47% | 8.7 -10% | 14.2 -80% | 2.9 63% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 6.7 -29% | 5.7 -10% | 2 62% | 2.1 60% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.06 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6875 95% | 7457 87% | 7921 82% | 6930 94% | 6647 98% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 80650 Hz | ≤ 55 % de brillo | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 80650 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 55 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 80650 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
37.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12.4 ms subida | |
↘ 14.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
40.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida | |
↘ 18.4 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 60 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
Apple iPad (2017) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60) | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55) | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad (2017) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 (Chrome 58) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M (Chrome 55) | |
Apple iPad (2017) |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | Lenovo Tab 4 10 | Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | 17% | 12% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 262.2 | 209.3 -20% | 275 5% | 154.7 -41% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 147.7 | 136.5 -8% | 45.3 -69% | 41.1 -72% |
Random Read 4KB | 27.72 | 24.85 -10% | 32.3 17% | 50 80% |
Random Write 4KB | 9.37 | 6.8 -27% | 8.9 -5% | 5.3 -43% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 55.5 ? | 45.15 ? -19% | 84.5 52% | 83 ? 50% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.14 ? | 26.9 ? -11% | 59.9 99% | 58.7 ? 95% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configuraciones | Valor | ||
high | 22 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Temple Run 2 | |||
Configuraciones | Valor | ||
default | 60 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configuraciones | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.24 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.55 / 4.17 / 4.25 Watt |
Carga |
7.13 / 9.63 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 7000 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | 22% | -50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.55 | 1.59 -3% | 1.09 30% | 2.06 -33% |
Idle Average * | 4.17 | 4.14 1% | 3.71 11% | 7.42 -78% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.25 | 4.23 -0% | 3.84 10% | 7.47 -76% |
Load Average * | 7.13 | 10.89 -53% | 5.07 29% | 9.45 -33% |
Load Maximum * | 9.63 | 11.58 -20% | 6.88 29% | 12.31 -28% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T3 10 4800 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 8% | 17% | -7% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 960 | 1453 51% | 1134 18% | 1496 56% | |
H.264 | 585 | 600 3% | 527 -10% | 845 44% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 542 | 518 -4% | 632 17% | 439 -19% | 764 41% |
Load | 274 | 225 -18% | 229 -16% | 225 -18% |
Pro
Contra
Aquellos que compren una tableta Amazon Fire HD 10 de séptima generación recibirán un especialista en multimedia en el espacio ecológico de Amazon sin mayores fallas. Es exactamente eso lo que hace que el dispositivo sea una alternativa real que se puede tener a un precio bastante bajo.
En el lado positivo hay una buena pantalla, altavoces decentes, Wi-Fi rápido y un chipset rápido que de otra manera solo se usaría en dispositivos más caros. Por otro lado, el software base anticuado que probablemente no recibirá ninguna otra actualización es una desilusión.
La Amazon Fire HD 10 es una alternativa de precio asequible para los consumidores multimedia.
Definitivamente, faltan funciones como NFC, aptX, GPS, Miracast, carga rápida o una mejor selección de sensores. Por otra parte, Alexa todavía no se ejecuta sin problemas, aunque esto se solucionará en el futuro con las actualizaciones. Sin embargo, Amazon tiene una fuerte oferta combinada a un precio atractivo
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt