Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis de la tablet Asus ZenPad 3S 10 LTE (Z500KL)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 486 cd/m²
Contraste: 1944:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.73
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Google Pixel C LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7" | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Apple iPad (2017) IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -27% | -25% | 16% | 30% | -29% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 486 | 489 1% | 487 0% | 358 -26% | 452 -7% | 460 -5% | 514 6% |
| Brightness | 457 | 443 -3% | 510 12% | 357 -22% | 468 2% | 445 -3% | 485 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 91 3% | 86 -2% | 82 -7% | 90 2% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.43 -72% | 0.39 -56% | 0.45 -80% | 0.46 -84% | ||
| Contrast | 1944 | 1137 -42% | 1249 -36% | 1022 -47% | 1117 -43% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5.5 -6% | 5.24 -1% | 1.78 66% | 1.8 65% | 6.2 -19% | 1.4 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9 | 11.6 -29% | 4 56% | 10.5 -17% | 2.9 68% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 6.7 -63% | 7.95 -94% | 1.38 66% | 1.2 71% | 6.5 -59% | 2.1 49% |
| Gamma | 2.73 81% | 2.06 107% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.33 94% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6579 99% | 7457 87% | 6565 99% | 6366 102% | 6500 100% | 8056 81% | 6647 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.32 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.06 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 142900 Hz | ≤ 10 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 142900 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 10 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 142900 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 16 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 81 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 49 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 25.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.57 / 4 / 4.09 Watt |
| Carga |
7.99 / 9.71 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL 7800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -19% | -21% | 6% | 8% | -49% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.57 | 1.59 -1% | 1.82 -16% | 2.3 -46% | 2.08 -32% | 1.51 4% | 2.06 -31% |
| Idle Average * | 4 | 4.14 -4% | 4.26 -7% | 4.5 -13% | 3.5 12% | 3.64 9% | 7.42 -86% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.09 | 4.23 -3% | 4.33 -6% | 5 -22% | 3.58 12% | 3.68 10% | 7.47 -83% |
| Load Average * | 7.99 | 10.89 -36% | 9.82 -23% | 9.4 -18% | 6.97 13% | 6.95 13% | 9.45 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.71 | 11.58 -19% | 13.99 -44% | 10.4 -7% | 7.4 24% | 9.11 6% | 12.31 -27% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL 7800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 579 | 518 -11% | 638 10% | 393 -32% | 760 31% | 546 -6% | 764 32% |
Pro
Contra
Aunque los puntos negativos del ZenPad 3S 10 LTE sobrepasan a los positivos, la tablet premium de Asus no es para nada un mal dispositivo. Los elementos visuales así como la calidad de la carcasa son muy buenos. Desafortunadamente no podemos decir lo mismo de la calidad de fabricación de la unidad probada. El panel IPS es suficientemente nítido y tiene buen brillo y contraste más que suficiente para su uso cotidiano. LA duración de batería y el rendimiento del sistema son más que satisfactorios.
Lo que menos nos ha gustado son los componentes que equipa el ZenPad 3S 10 LTE considerando que el precio de compra es de 450 euros. La tablet de Asus no incluye lector de huellas dactilares, tiene un almacenamiento eMMC muy lento de solo 32 GB, no tiene NFC, las teclas de navegación no se iluminan y el SoC ofrece poco rendimiento (teniendo en cuenta su precio). La tasa de transferencia de la WLAN y la calidad de la cámara en la parte posterior podrían ser mejores. Considerando que la versión actual de Android O (Beta) un dispositivo con Android 6.0 no está al día.
Demasiados puntos negativos sobre el Asus ZenPad 3S 10 LTE nos llevan a una recomendación de compra limitada, a pesar de su buen resultado global - al menos por precio de venta actual.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
- 05/22/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
