Breve análisis del Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
Networking | |
WiFi Speed Client 1m | |
WiFi Speed Server 1m |
|
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 213.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 608:1 (Negro: 0.351 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.59 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.01% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ AU Optronics AUO38ED / AUO B156HTN03.8, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ProBook 450 G3 AU Optronics, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng BOE, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 156AT37-T01 (SDC4141), TN, 15.6", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 1% | 19% | 8% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.21 | 38.1 2% | 37.63 1% | 44.11 19% | 40.21 8% | 36.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 56 | 57.3 2% | 56.7 1% | 66.4 19% | 60.1 7% | 55.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.44 | 39.37 2% | 38.88 1% | 45.57 19% | 41.56 8% | 37.92 -1% |
Response Times | -3% | -4% | 28% | 35% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.4 ? | 41.2 ? 3% | 50 ? -18% | 28 ? 34% | 22 ? 48% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 28 ? -9% | 23 ? 10% | 20 ? 22% | 20 ? 22% | |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? | ||||
Screen | 2% | -2% | -8% | 9% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 213.4 | 211 -1% | 241 13% | 223 4% | 245 15% | 251 18% |
Brightness | 209 | 214 2% | 226 8% | 215 3% | 230 10% | 236 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 89 3% | 83 -3% | 84 -2% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.351 | 0.43 -23% | 0.48 -37% | 0.76 -117% | 0.46 -31% | 0.44 -25% |
Contrast | 608 | 491 -19% | 502 -17% | 293 -52% | 533 -12% | 570 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 13.35 | 9.25 31% | 12.43 7% | 8.5 36% | 8.34 38% | 14.58 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.79 | 21.03 3% | 12.31 44% | 24.59 -13% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.59 | 9.83 28% | 13.24 3% | 9.35 31% | 9.48 30% | 16.8 -24% |
Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.82 78% | 2.61 84% | 2.46 89% | 2.38 92% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 18870 34% | 10890 60% | 15733 41% | 10402 62% | 10624 61% | 27039 24% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.44 | 36.4 -5% | 36 -6% | 42 9% | 38 -1% | 35 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.01 | 57.3 2% | 57 2% | 66 18% | 57 2% | 56 0% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 0% /
2% | -2% /
-2% | 6% /
-1% | 15% /
11% | 9% /
1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 8.4 ms subida | |
↘ 17.2 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
42.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21.2 ms subida | |
↘ 21.2 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 67 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3665 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4403 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4408 puntos | |
ayuda |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP ProBook 450 G3 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 44% | 74% | 26% | 24% | 17% | 20297% | |
Read Seq | 100.8 | 122.8 22% | 120.4 19% | 93.4 -7% | 103.5 3% | 105.6 5% | 515 411% |
Write Seq | 57.4 | 123.5 115% | 123.1 114% | 91.1 59% | 91.1 59% | 93.4 63% | 338 489% |
Read 512 | 31.19 | 33.14 6% | 34.31 10% | 31.42 1% | 33.74 8% | 31.7 2% | 368.1 1080% |
Write 512 | 38.67 | 56.5 46% | 66.8 73% | 34.81 -10% | 38.77 0% | 27.54 -29% | 338.6 776% |
Read 4k | 0.509 | 0.341 -33% | 0.373 -27% | 0.384 -25% | 0.374 -27% | 0.374 -27% | 28.88 5574% |
Write 4k | 0.615 | 0.721 17% | 1.29 110% | 0.85 38% | 0.649 6% | 0.72 17% | 74.2 11965% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.351 | 0.897 156% | 0.976 178% | 0.729 108% | 0.818 133% | 0.694 98% | 319.9 91040% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.605 | 0.727 20% | 1.285 112% | 0.871 44% | 0.648 7% | 0.646 7% | 309.4 51040% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2567 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46105 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6995 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1083 puntos | |
ayuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ | |
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 35.5 | 26 | 21.8 | 13.6 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 74.2 | 44.8 | 38.2 | 8.9 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 41.2 | 26.4 | 14.6 | 11.6 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 31 / 31 / 31 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 39.1 / 41 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP ProBook 450 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng GeForce 940M, 5500U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | -1% | -15% | 0% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28.8 | 31.2 -8% | 31.2 -8% | 31.3 -9% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.3 -4% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 32.1 -4% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.3 -4% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 32.1 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 29.7 4% | 32.5 -5% | 34.5 -11% | 33.5 -8% | 33.1 -7% |
Load Average * | 39.1 | 33.1 15% | 36 8% | 44.1 -13% | 33.5 14% | 37.8 3% |
Load Maximum * | 41 | 34.2 17% | 38.8 5% | 52.5 -28% | 33.5 18% | 37.7 8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 2.2 / 2.29 Watt |
Ocioso | 11.84 / 14.16 / 14.46 Watt |
Carga |
51.69 / 46.56 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng 5500U, GeForce 940M, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 41% | 49% | 26% | 56% | 44% | 37% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.84 | 4.9 59% | 5.2 56% | 4.8 59% | 4.8 59% | 4.2 65% | 3.4 71% |
Idle Average * | 14.16 | 8.2 42% | 7.25 49% | 8.1 43% | 7.5 47% | 6.6 53% | 6.5 54% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.46 | 9 38% | 7.9 45% | 8.3 43% | 9.2 36% | 7.5 48% | 7 52% |
Load Average * | 51.69 | 30.1 42% | 25.1 51% | 42.5 18% | 16 69% | 36.3 30% | 44.5 14% |
Load Maximum * | 46.56 | 36.1 22% | 25.1 46% | 61.1 -31% | 15.4 67% | 36.5 22% | 49.5 -6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 37 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng 5500U, GeForce 940M, 41 Wh | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, 44 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 77% | 198% | 66% | 15% | 104% | 215% | |
Reader / Idle | 273 | 575 111% | 885 224% | 563 106% | 1035 279% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 180 | 309 72% | 566 214% | 267 48% | 207 15% | 367 104% | 412 129% |
Load | 61 | 90 48% | 157 157% | 88 44% | 206 238% |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ es un sistema de buen rendimiento con una buena calidad de construcción - descontando la tapa de display algo inestable - y en general una ergonomía decente. Lo lastran dos defectos importantes: primero el display es muy impreciso salvo que se calibre y le falta bastante brillo para el uso en exteriores. Segundo, el aguante de batería es definitivamente mediocre. No estamo sseguros de por qué el consumo de energía es tan alto comparado con otros, pero Acer necesita volver a la mesa de diseño aquí y trabajar para reducirlo. Como sustituto de sobremesa para procesado de texto y navegar así como la ocasional sesión de juego, el E5 no es necesariamente una mala elección.
Los usuarios que busquen un sistema asequible seguramente quedarán satisfechos con el Aspire E5 - siempre que la movilidad no sea una prioridad.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
- 09/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Bernhard Pechlaner