Breve análisis del Acer Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 177 cd/m²
Contraste: 374:1 (Negro: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 ChiMei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) CMN15BA, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 LG LP156WF6-SPK1, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 100% | 101% | 26% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.57 | 84.2 118% | 84.9 120% | 48.96 27% | 39.48 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.4 | 99.7 74% | 99.8 74% | 70.9 24% | 59 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.89 | 82.7 107% | 83.3 109% | 50.3 26% | 40.81 2% |
| Response Times | -5% | -15% | 4% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 44 ? -13% | 44 ? -13% | 36 ? 8% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 23 ? 4% | 28 ? -17% | 24 ? -0% | |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 200 ? | 50 ? | ||
| Screen | 13% | 27% | 51% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 176 | 234 33% | 249 41% | 389 121% | 291 65% |
| Brightness | 169 | 219 30% | 240 42% | 353 109% | 270 60% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 80 -12% | 86 -5% | 83 -9% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.48 -2% | 0.48 -2% | 0.31 34% | 0.38 19% |
| Contrast | 374 | 488 30% | 519 39% | 1255 236% | 766 105% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.83 | 11.8 -34% | 10.15 -15% | 11.53 -31% | 8.6 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.01 | 20.69 -48% | 17.39 -24% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.97 | 13.3 -48% | 12.13 -35% | 13.46 -50% | 8.5 5% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.3 96% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 10234 64% | 17098 38% | 13445 48% | 12024 54% | 6184 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.8 | 74 101% | 74 101% | 46 25% | 32 -13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.3 | 100 75% | 100 75% | 71 24% | 59 3% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 36% /
28% | 38% /
37% | 39% /
45% | 9% /
15% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida | |
| ↘ 5 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida | |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 | |
| Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
| Pass 1 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Pass 2 | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Phison 128GB PS3109-S9 | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB | Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 5491% | 29% | 14969% | 15639% | |
| Read Seq | 95.3 | 433.2 355% | 108.1 13% | 503 428% | 509 434% |
| Write Seq | 85.6 | 131.9 54% | 105.6 23% | 302.9 254% | 459.4 437% |
| Read 512 | 29.32 | 250 753% | 35.32 20% | 424.5 1348% | 413.8 1311% |
| Write 512 | 25.93 | 90.6 249% | 46.13 78% | 302.2 1065% | 383.6 1379% |
| Read 4k | 0.366 | 30.69 8285% | 0.413 13% | 33.57 9072% | 45.35 12291% |
| Write 4k | 0.726 | 51.2 6952% | 0.9 24% | 90.6 12379% | 100.1 13688% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.647 | 112.2 17242% | 0.895 38% | 353.7 54568% | 356.1 54939% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.722 | 73.2 10039% | 0.884 22% | 294.1 40634% | 294.1 40634% |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3162 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3696 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4047 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 18647 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4212 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 45360 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9392 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3218 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1614 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Battlefield 4 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 126.8 | 96.8 | 86.7 | 35 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 109.7 | 78.6 | 61 | 26.9 |
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 144.1 | 79.3 | 45.2 | 24.6 |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 33.8 | 30.6 | 18.4 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 45.2 | 31.6 | 18.8 | 16.9 |
| The Division (2016) | 63.8 | 41.5 | 20.4 | 15.4 |
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 34.6 | 34.1 | 11.6 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 152.7 | 107.4 | 71.5 | 32.8 |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 69.3 | 51.6 | 23.6 | 18.3 |
| No Man's Sky (2016) | 35.6 | 29.4 | 18.2 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 30.9 | 24.5 | 14.2 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.2 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 33.4 / 40.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.8 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6 / 8.1 / 9.8 Watt |
| Carga |
52.5 / 81.6 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -40% | -65% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6 | 8.3 -38% | 8.7 -45% | 10.2 -70% | 5.6 7% |
| Idle Average * | 8.1 | 12.1 -49% | 14.5 -79% | 15.6 -93% | 10.9 -35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 15.4 -57% | 15.6 -59% | 17 -73% | 10.6 -8% |
| Load Average * | 52.5 | 56 -7% | 61 -16% | 79 -50% | 61 -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 81.6 | 70 14% | 82 -0% | 115.2 -41% | 60 26% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh | Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 56 Wh | Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 12% | -33% | -40% | -14% | -20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 767 | 667 -13% | 521 -32% | 715 -7% | 535 -30% | |
| H.264 | 460 | 335 -27% | 114 -75% | 241 -48% | 305 -34% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 451 | 386 -14% | 230 -49% | 270 -40% | 255 -43% | 303 -33% |
| Load | 75 | 152 103% | 93 24% | 108 44% | 87 16% |
Pro
Contra
No debería sorprender que nadie se espere un dispositivo de gama alta sin sacrificios en la categoría de 600 Euros. Acer, sin embargo, ofrece una configuración sólida y un dispositivo adecuado para el juego en el mercado convencional con su Aspire E15 E5-575G-549D. Su bajo precio implica algunas medidas de austeridad más o menos dolorosas. Obviamente no había lugar para una estilosa caracasa de metal, un SSD veloz, o un panel IPS brillante en el presupuesto - pero un procesador Kaby Lake último grito, una rápida GPU de gama media, y 8 GB de RAM DDR 4 así como un gran disco duro sí son posibles. ESta configuración hace al Aspire incondicionalmente adecuado para el juego, aunque la resolución nativa de la pantalla sólo se pueda usar en unos pocos casos. Sin embargo, todos los juegos nuevos son jugables con algunas pérdidas visuales - lo que no es lo habitual en un portátil.
Podemos dar al Aspire una valoración de muy bueno en términos de calidad de construcción y dispositivos de entrada. Aparte del bajísimo brillo de pantalla, en general, el dispositivo apenas debilidades importantes e incluso sorprende con puntos fuertes inesperados: De siete a ocho horas de batería en el test Wi-Fi (a pesar de tener sólo 1x1 TX/RX) no se ven ni en modelos más caros. Por ello, podemos resumir:
Los compradores que busquen un portátil multimedia asequible con reservas para juego hasta actuales no se equivocarán con el Acer Aspire E5-575G. Sin embargo, el Aspire no es adecuado fuera debido a su oscurísima pantalla.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
- 09/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Till Schönborn
Price comparison
