Breve análisis del Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
| Asus F540SA-XX087T | |
| Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN | |
| Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 201 cd/m²
Contraste: 300:1 (Negro: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.06 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.04% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.56
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus F540SA-XX087T TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE ChiMei CMN15C6 N156BGE-EB2, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | 6% | -7% | 6% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.04 | 39.83 5% | 40.21 6% | 35.43 -7% | 40.17 6% | 37.59 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.2 | 59.5 4% | 60.1 5% | 53.3 -7% | 60 5% | 56.3 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.3 | 41.19 5% | 41.56 6% | 36.6 -7% | 41.54 6% | 38.85 -1% |
| Response Times | -11% | 24% | -12% | 33% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 47 ? -9% | 28 ? 35% | 42.4 ? 1% | 20 ? 53% | 43.6 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 26 ? -13% | 20 ? 13% | 28.8 ? -25% | 20 ? 13% | 25.6 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 200 ? | 200 ? | 200 ? | ||
| Screen | 18% | 21% | -10% | 30% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 201 | 245 22% | 245 22% | 199.8 -1% | 215 7% | 206 2% |
| Brightness | 202 | 238 18% | 230 14% | 199 -1% | 200 -1% | 195 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 84 -9% | 85 -8% | 87 -5% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.42 37% | 0.46 31% | 0.712 -6% | 0.26 61% | 0.35 48% |
| Contrast | 300 | 583 94% | 533 78% | 281 -6% | 827 176% | 589 96% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.36 | 10.49 -1% | 8.34 19% | 13.24 -28% | 13.07 -26% | 8.96 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.88 | 16.84 11% | 12.31 35% | 21.52 -14% | 16.06 15% | 14.26 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.06 | 11.47 -4% | 9.48 14% | 13.33 -21% | 4.34 61% | 9.27 16% |
| Gamma | 2.56 86% | 2.52 87% | 2.38 92% | 1.69 130% | 2.48 89% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 11368 57% | 13286 49% | 10624 61% | 15879 41% | 7212 90% | 11213 58% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 38 6% | 38 6% | 33.8 -6% | 38 6% | 35.89 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 60 5% | 57 0% | 53.4 -6% | 60 5% | 56.26 -1% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 4% /
12% | 17% /
18% | -10% /
-9% | 23% /
25% | 4% /
12% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 16 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 43 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1993 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire E15 ES1-512-P1SM Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Asus F540SA-XX087T Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 9% | -0% | 2813% | -12% | 18% | |
| Read Seq | 107.6 | 105.1 -2% | 103.5 -4% | 484.4 350% | 98.3 -9% | 100 -7% |
| Write Seq | 96.6 | 102.8 6% | 91.1 -6% | 139.2 44% | 89.8 -7% | 99.8 3% |
| Read 512 | 22.5 | 31.56 40% | 33.74 50% | 338.1 1403% | 20.79 -8% | 35.48 58% |
| Write 512 | 24.23 | 45.47 88% | 38.77 60% | 134.7 456% | 34.84 44% | 46.19 91% |
| Read 4k | 0.474 | 0.35 -26% | 0.374 -21% | 17.21 3531% | 0.335 -29% | 0.424 -11% |
| Write 4k | 1.089 | 0.94 -14% | 0.649 -40% | 31.52 2794% | 0.619 -43% | 0.966 -11% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.861 | 0.72 -16% | 0.818 -5% | 94.6 10887% | 0.789 -8% | 1.031 20% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.991 | 0.94 -5% | 0.648 -35% | 31.08 3036% | 0.641 -35% | 1 1% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 686 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 35 | 31 | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 23.7 | 13.6 | 11.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 32 | 22 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.2 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 34.8 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 33.9 / 34.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.15 / 0.35 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.3 / 8.8 / 9.7 Watt |
| Carga |
18 / 18.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA es un sencillo portátil ofimático de 15.6", que confia en la plataforma Intel Apollo Lake. El procesador quad-core ofrece bastante rendimiento para el trabajo ofimático y navegar por la web. El decodificador integrado soporta los formatos de vídeo típicos. El portátil funciona en silencio y apenas se calienta. El espacio de almacenamiento es abundante en este modelo de pruebas gracias al HDD de 1 TB. El HDD se puede cambiar por un SSD por la escotilla de mantenimiento. El teclado puede no ser el mejor del mercado, pero es cómodo para el uso doméstico. El portátil tiene un aguante de b atería medio y la oferta la remata una garantía de 2 años.
Este Aspire es un sencillo portátil para escribir y navegar.
El mayor punto débil de este modelo es su punto de venta más intrigante: el display FHD. Acer ha elegido un panel oscuro de poco ángulo de visión. Al menos, el fabricante ha elegido un display mate sin parpadeo PWM.
Consejo: los usuarios que prefieran usar un SSD en vez de un HDD deberían echar un vistazo al Aspire ES1-533-P9CX. Este modelo usa un SSD de 256 GB en vez de un HDD. El resto de la conectividad es la misma que la de nuestro modelo de pruebas.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
- 12/30/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
