Breve análisis del Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE (7700HQ, GTX 1060, 4k)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1188:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.61
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte P57X v7 IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w100ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w010ng IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | 1% | 1% | -3% | -23% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 85.4 | 64 -25% | 87.1 2% | 87.8 3% | 90.2 6% | 67.2 -21% | 88.5 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 90.2 -10% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 86.6 -13% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.8 | 65.4 -33% | 99.4 2% | 98.9 1% | 83.9 -14% | 63.3 -35% | 100 2% |
| Response Times | -10% | -49% | -83% | 37% | -7% | -37% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 36 ? -24% | 50.8 -75% | 55.6 ? -92% | 28 ? 3% | 35 ? -21% | 49 ? -69% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 26 ? 4% | 33.2 -23% | 46.8 ? -73% | 8 ? 70% | 25 ? 7% | 28 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | ||||||
| Screen | -3% | -12% | -2% | 3% | -5% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 380 | 346 -9% | 325.7 -14% | 441.3 16% | 270 -29% | 342 -10% | 316 -17% |
| Brightness | 336 | 307 -9% | 309 -8% | 408 21% | 254 -24% | 331 -1% | 312 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 84 4% | 90 11% | 86 6% | 86 6% | 84 4% | 90 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.37 -16% | 0.44 -38% | 0.26 19% | 0.32 -0% | 0.29 9% |
| Contrast | 1188 | 1331 12% | 880 -26% | 1003 -16% | 1038 -13% | 1069 -10% | 1090 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.32 | 4.32 19% | 6.5 -22% | 5.1 4% | 3.33 37% | 4.35 18% | 5.69 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.63 | 8.05 -6% | 9.6 -26% | 9.8 -28% | 6.07 20% | 9.24 -21% | 7.94 -4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 5.76 -18% | 5.6 -14% | 4.3 12% | 3.46 29% | 3.73 24% | 6.12 -25% |
| Gamma | 2.61 84% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% | 2.08 106% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.56 86% |
| CCT | 6558 99% | 6447 101% | 5860 111% | 7345 88% | 7419 88% | 6801 96% | 5875 111% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.2 | 59 -32% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 75 -14% | 57 -35% | 87 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 90 -10% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 86 -14% | 100 0% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -12% /
-8% | -20% /
-14% | -28% /
-12% | 12% /
6% | -12% /
-9% | -13% /
-8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 15 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3444 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5002 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4207 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | HP Omen 17-w100ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -16% | 0% | -17% | -25% | -39% | |
| Read Seq | 880 | 493.1 -44% | 1076 22% | 517 -41% | 510 -42% | 495 -44% |
| Write Seq | 581 | 270.2 -53% | 263.2 -55% | 305.7 -47% | 274.6 -53% | 180.2 -69% |
| Read 512 | 725 | 325.8 -55% | 695 -4% | 315 -57% | 427.2 -41% | 315.5 -56% |
| Write 512 | 429.3 | 267.8 -38% | 472.3 10% | 306.1 -29% | 247.2 -42% | 172.4 -60% |
| Read 4k | 10.46 | 28.4 172% | 20.09 92% | 26.04 149% | 21.23 103% | 20.25 94% |
| Write 4k | 123.4 | 76.2 -38% | 116.2 -6% | 82.3 -33% | 86.8 -30% | 76.1 -38% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 459.2 | 344.6 -25% | 282.7 -38% | 281.3 -39% | 335.4 -27% | 141.6 -69% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 496.9 | 267 -46% | 405.2 -18% | 296 -40% | 178.1 -64% | 170.8 -66% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27081 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12613 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9575 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5090 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3615 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 247 | 227.9 | 210.5 | 108 | |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 116 | 84 | 76 | 58 | 24 |
| For Honor (2017) | 220.3 | 103.5 | 98.2 | 71.3 | 29 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 145.1 | 70.4 | 63.8 | 36.2 | 21.5 |
| Prey (2017) | 141.8 | 136.7 | 117.3 | 99.1 | 35.1 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 247.1 | 233.5 | 169.4 | 63.4 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 214.4 | 162.3 | 90.2 | 51.8 | 31.5 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| HP Omen 17-w100ng | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.6 / 44.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.85 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.5 / 20.5 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
91 / 155 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
El portátil gaming 4k de Acer es capaz de ejecutar todos los juegos actuales de forma fluida. Sin embargo, a 4K la mayoría de juegos resultan injugables debido a su GPU básica de alto rendimiento. Sin embargo, en FHD la experiencia de juego es fluida y agradable. Lo que es más, el módulo de seguimiento ocular de Tobii te permite controlar juegos con el movimiento de tus ojos.
El Aspire VN7-793G-738J es un portátil gaming perfectamente equilibrado.
En el uso diario, el portátil permaneció fresco y quedo, y rindió muy bien gracias a su SSD NVMe. Y, si hace falta más almacenamiento, el portátil también trae una ranura SATA 2.5" libre.
El display mate 4K ofrece ángulo de visión decente, nitidísima calidad de imagen, y altos niveles de brillo y contraste. El aguante de la batería es mediocre como mucho, pero no está mal para un portátil gaming 4K. El puerto Thunderbolt 3 es un añadido muy bienvenido.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
- 06/12/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
