Breve análisis del Acer Aspire VX5-591G (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050 Ti)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
|
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 878:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.59
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 57% | 74% | 47% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.88 | 65.8 69% | 68.9 77% | 61.5 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 85.1 46% | 98.9 70% | 80.4 38% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.2 | 62.2 55% | 70.9 76% | 58.8 46% |
Response Times | -67% | -137% | -48% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22 ? | 41 ? -86% | 54 ? -145% | 40 ? -82% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 34 ? -48% | 52.4 ? -128% | 26 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | 16% | 27% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 281 | 322 15% | 400 42% | 326 16% |
Brightness | 257 | 297 16% | 392 53% | 316 23% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 86 1% | 89 5% | 80 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.31 3% | 0.26 19% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 878 | 1039 18% | 1538 75% | 931 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.16 | 4.73 8% | 4.9 5% | 5.49 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.09 | 12.37 -36% | 11 -21% | 11.36 -25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 2.99 35% | 7.2 -58% | 4.84 -6% |
Gamma | 2.59 85% | 2.32 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6931 94% | 6905 94% | 6911 94% | 5971 109% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 56 51% | 64.2 74% | 53 43% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 85 47% | 98.9 71% | 80 38% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 2% /
13% | -12% /
14% | 2% /
8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida | |
↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
22 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida | |
↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 30 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3565 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4442 puntos | |
ayuda |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 1647% | 8078% | |
Read Seq | 101.5 | 120.9 19% | 123 21% | 459.3 353% |
Write Seq | 100.6 | 101.8 1% | 74.2 -26% | 325.5 224% |
Read 512 | 28.33 | 37.83 34% | 101.7 259% | 279.2 886% |
Write 512 | 28.31 | 84.4 198% | 42.51 50% | 280.1 889% |
Read 4k | 0.327 | 0.473 45% | 10.84 3215% | 22.43 6759% |
Write 4k | 0.846 | 0.313 -63% | 1.021 21% | 74.9 8753% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.718 | 1.133 58% | 69.8 9621% | 149 20652% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.893 | 0.274 -69% | 1.057 18% | 234 26104% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8674 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20791 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6774 puntos | |
ayuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.8 | 25.2 | ||
The Division (2016) | 0 | 42.6 | 34.9 | |
For Honor (2017) | 44.8 | 40.9 | 21.2 | |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 40.9 | 21.2 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 31.8 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 36.8 / 41.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.31 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 7 / 10.2 / 14 Watt |
Carga |
78 / 127 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 8% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 7.2 -3% | 6.6 6% | 5 29% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 10.5 -3% | 9 12% | 8.9 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 14 | 16 -14% | 10.7 24% | 11.8 16% |
Load Average * | 78 | 82 -5% | 77.5 1% | 55 29% |
Load Maximum * | 127 | 155 -22% | 130 -2% | 93 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 124 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 51% | 30% | 71% | |
Reader / Idle | 322 | 501 56% | 565 75% | 816 153% |
WiFi v1.3 | 302 | 357 18% | 334 11% | 430 42% |
Load | 81 | 144 78% | 84 4% | 95 17% |
H.264 | 428 |
Pro
Contra
Nada espectacular, pero sólido - Acer ha hecho un buen trabajo con su nuevo VX5-591G-75C4.
Excepto por el veloz procesador, la mayoría de componentes están situados en la parte alta de la gama media, correspondiente al precio de 1000 Euros de la versión de pruebas y 1200 Euros de la que tiene SSD. Esto nos lleva a la única pega real: Sólo podemos dar a un portátil multimedia sólido sin un SSD una recomendación de compra condicional. Los usuarios que quieran más potencia de juego y necesiten por tanto una GTX 1060 tendrán que hacer inevitables compromisos en ruido de sistema, ya que su consistente producción de ruido quedo es uno de los puntos fuertes del nuevo portátil multimedia de Acer.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
- 04/11/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn