Breve análisis del Acer Nitro 5 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Acer Deutschland
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (Nitro 5 AN515 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1734 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit , ForceWare 385.41, Optimus
Memoría
8 GB
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, dos ranuras RAM (ocupadas)
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB
, + WDC WD10SPZX (1 TB, 5400 rpm), 1140 GB libre
Peso
2.7 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 563 g
Precio
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 276 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 264.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.76
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX502VM-AS73 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer X6603 AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -7% | -13% | -9% | -12% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.7 | 38.59 -7% | 38.88 -7% | 36.42 -13% | 38.28 -8% | 36.82 -12% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.2 | 58 -7% | 58.2 -6% | 54.9 -12% | 56.9 -9% | 54.9 -12% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.17 | 39.87 -8% | 40.2 -7% | 37.62 -13% | 39.47 -9% | 38.09 -12% | |
| Response Times | -24% | 16% | -34% | -66% | 9% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35 ? | 42 ? -20% | 22 ? 37% | 36 ? -3% | 58.8 ? -68% | 28.4 ? 19% | 46 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 28 ? -27% | 23 ? -5% | 36 ? -64% | 36 ? -64% | 22.4 ? -2% | 29 ? -32% |
| PWM Frequency | 21550 ? | 2174 ? | |||||
| Screen | 7% | -3% | -54% | -29% | -33% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 230 -17% | 281 2% | 246 -11% | 239 -13% | 209.5 -24% | 252 -9% |
| Brightness | 265 | 228 -14% | 257 -3% | 235 -11% | 244 -8% | 205 -23% | 246 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 85 -7% | 75 -18% | 88 -3% | 92 1% | 94 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.21 16% | 0.32 -28% | 0.55 -120% | 0.35 -40% | 0.69 -176% | 0.23 8% |
| Contrast | 1104 | 1095 -1% | 878 -20% | 447 -60% | 683 -38% | 304 -72% | 1096 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.06 | 4.01 21% | 5.16 -2% | 10.97 -117% | 7.3 -44% | 4.7 7% | 7.83 -55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.13 | 7.26 28% | 9.09 10% | 24.7 -144% | 19.7 -94% | 15.5 -53% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.25 | 3.18 49% | 4.57 27% | 14.25 -128% | 4.9 22% | 1.8 71% | 7.11 -14% |
| Gamma | 1.76 125% | 2.52 87% | 2.59 85% | 1.83 120% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6873 95% | 6814 95% | 6931 94% | 11200 58% | 7332 89% | 6975 93% | 7930 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 37 -7% | 37 -7% | 35 -12% | 35 -12% | 36.2 -9% | 35 -12% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 58 -6% | 58 -6% | 55 -11% | 55 -11% | 56.6 -9% | 55 -11% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -8% /
-0% | 2% /
-1% | -34% /
-42% | -48% /
-35% | -11% /
-22% | -20% /
-17% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
ℹ
Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 35 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit - CoolBoost switched off (lower curve), CoolBoost switched on (upper curve)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | JetStream 1.1
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (Edge 38.14393.1066.0) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (EDGE 38.1439.3.00) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (Edge 40) | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6346 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4177 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5291 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5096 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4474 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Sequential Read:
945 MB/s
Sequential Write:
559 MB/s
512K Read:
639 MB/s
512K Write:
561 MB/s
4K Read:
24.24 MB/s
4K Write:
122.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
288.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
504 MB/s
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX502VM-AS73 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Medion Erazer X6603 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 75% | -95% | -30% | 64% | -40% | 63% | |
| Read Seq | 945 | 1657 75% | 101.5 -89% | 485.8 -49% | 2170 130% | 503 -47% | 2170 130% |
| Write Seq | 559 | 1208 116% | 100.6 -82% | 422.8 -24% | 1202 115% | 138.2 -75% | 1100 97% |
| Read 512 | 639 | 806 26% | 28.33 -96% | 338.9 -47% | 786 23% | 343.5 -46% | 788 23% |
| Write 512 | 561 | 807 44% | 28.31 -95% | 304 -46% | 822 47% | 137.8 -75% | 831 48% |
| Read 4k | 24.24 | 62.6 158% | 0.327 -99% | 27.11 12% | 58.9 143% | 29.36 21% | 59 143% |
| Write 4k | 122.7 | 176.9 44% | 0.846 -99% | 85.4 -30% | 146.4 19% | 70.9 -42% | 147.2 20% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 288.5 | 650 125% | 0.718 -100% | 279.6 -3% | 457.7 59% | 369.9 28% | 464 61% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 504 | 557 11% | 0.893 -100% | 255.1 -49% | 392.9 -22% | 99.7 -80% | 398.7 -21% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27190 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9084 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 124922 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22182 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6730 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3554 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2446 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E (CoolBoost on) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
The Witcher 3 ultra
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 423.3 | 304.5 | 196.3 | 89 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 260.7 | 206.7 | 185.8 | 74.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 141.1 | 86.3 | 47.4 | 24.2 |
| Prey (2017) | 142.5 | 102.6 | 82.8 | 66.8 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 247.6 | 178.5 | 111.3 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 249.9 | 114.5 | 59.6 | 36.1 |
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 126 | 58.8 | 51.5 | 35.9 |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 178 | 91 | 71 | 44 |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 94.9 | 31.3 | 22.7 | 14.6 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 43 / 45.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 3% | -2% | 3% | -3% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.6 | 30 2% | 30.4 1% | 30.3 1% | 27.7 9% | 28.7 6% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 32 -5% | 31.4 -3% | 30.9 -1% | 30.5 -0% | 30.6 -0% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 30.7 | 34 -11% | 31.4 -2% | 30.9 -1% | 30.5 1% | 30.6 -0% | 30.9 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 36 -17% | 31.4 -2% | 31 -1% | 30.6 -0% | 31 -1% | 31.6 -3% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 48 -12% | 36.8 14% | 46.5 -8% | 40 7% | 46.2 -7% | 38.5 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.7 | 49 -23% | 40 -1% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 45.8 | 51 -11% | 41.3 10% | 46.8 -2% | 42.6 7% | 52.3 -14% | 40.8 11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -20% | -9% | 6% | -15% | -23% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.1 | 52.4 -27% | 47 -14% | 43.4 -6% | 46.8 -14% | 53.2 -29% | 44.3 -8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 38.8 | 54.2 -40% | 47 -21% | 37.7 3% | 55.8 -44% | 56.8 -46% | 39.5 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.7 | 30.5 -6% | 28.4 1% | 24.3 15% | 27.6 4% | 28.8 -0% | 24.8 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.9 | 28.2 -5% | 27.1 -1% | 23.6 12% | 28.4 -6% | 31.4 -17% | 24.6 9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de corriente
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 6.9 / 9.5 Watt |
| Carga |
83 / 126 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -32% | -32% | 2% | -21% | -97% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 6 -46% | 7 -71% | 4.4 -7% | 8.5 -107% | 14.9 -263% | 4.7 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 11 -59% | 10.2 -48% | 6.8 1% | 9.1 -32% | 15.1 -119% | 7.6 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 18 -89% | 14 -47% | 8.3 13% | 9.7 -2% | 15.2 -60% | 9.2 3% |
| Load Average * | 83 | 81 2% | 78 6% | 81 2% | 79.9 4% | 105.8 -27% | 81 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 108 | 90 17% | 97.7 10% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 126 | 146 -16% | 127 -1% | 127 -1% | 121.5 4% | 148.8 -18% | 112 11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Medion Erazer X6603 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 3% | -20% | 41% | -37% | -29% | -38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 893 | 765 -14% | 322 -64% | 1174 31% | 509 -43% | 363 -59% | 340 -62% |
| H.264 | 309 | 196 -37% | 455 47% | 227 -27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 400 | 428 7% | 302 -24% | 622 56% | 240 -40% | 277 -31% | 257 -36% |
| Load | 63 | 97 54% | 81 29% | 81 29% | 46 -27% | 64 2% | 46 -27% |
Pro
+ display de alto contraste
+ Full HD
+ veloz SSD NVMe
+ buen aguante de batería
+ Wi-Fi AC
+ USB Type-C
+ escotillas de mantenimiento
Contra
- pantalla oscura
"Portátil potente para el juego casual" - así describe Acer el Nitro 5 - una descripción muy adecuada. El procesador Core i7 usado ofrece bastante potencia de cálculo para todas las áreas de uso importante. Combinado con la GPU GeForce GTX1050 Ti, el dispositivo puede ejecutar todos los juegos actuales en la pantalla mate Full HD. Pero tendrás que pasar sin los ajustes de calidad más altos - la GPU no da para tanto.
El Nitro 5 es un buen todoterreno centrado en los videojuegos.
Pero el dispositivo también lo hace bien en las áreas de uso generales (oficina, Internet). Apenas hace ruido bajo carga y en inactivo, y apenas se calienta siquiera bajo carga. Además, el dispositivo tiene un teclado iluminado adecuado para el mecanografiado normal y buen aguante de batería. El veloz SSD asegura un sistema fluido que puede usar un HDD de 2.5" para el almacenamiento.
El display mate IPS tiene ángulo de visión estable y buen contraste. El brillo es mejorable, empero. También creemos que el fabricante podría haberse estirado más en la conectividad. Por $1080, debería traer un puerto Thunderbolt 3 y un DisplayPort. El fuerte ruido del ventilador bajo carga también podría mejorarse.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
- 08/07/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - media ponderada
Price comparison
