Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Acer Predator 17 X (7820HK, FHD, GTX 1080)

¡Hace calor! El Acer Predator X es la "edición de lujo" extremadamente potente del Predator 17. ¿Están bien equilibrados los ocmponentes y basta el rendimiento para asegurarse un puesto en nuestro Top 10?
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Predator 17X Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7820HK 4 x 2.9 - 3.9 GHz @ 4.3 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1732 MHz, Memoría: 2700 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 378.66
Memoría
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/4 ranuras en uso, hasta 64 GB
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Söots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 (PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5"
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Conexiones
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: auriculares, micrófono, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Equipamento de red
Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 45 x 423 x 322
Battería
88.8 Wh, 6000 mAh Litio-Ion, 8 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (1280x720)
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 4.2 (Dolby Audio), Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente: 330 W, Acer Care Center, Predator Sense, Killer Network Manager, MS Office 365 (demo), XSplit Gamecaster (demo), 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
4.346 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 1.306 kg
Precio
3000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg428 mm 287 mm 49 mm 4.1 kg428 mm 294 mm 48 mm 3.8 kg423 mm 322 mm 45 mm 4.3 kg429 mm 309 mm 38 mm 4 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
 
168 MB/s +113%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
 
166 MB/s +110%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
 
125 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
 
79 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
78 MB/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6
 
78 MB/s -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
76 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
 
246 MB/s +176%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
 
224 MB/s +152%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
 
205 MB/s +130%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
 
89 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
88 MB/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6
 
87 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
86 MB/s -3%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
618 MBit/s -2%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s -12%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
354 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
675 MBit/s -1%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
672 MBit/s -1%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s -27%
The maintenance hatch reveals the memory and storage device.
The maintenance hatch reveals...
The maintenance hatch reveals the memory and storage device.
...the memory and storage device.
360
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 380 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 362 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1027:1 (Negro: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3"
Display
31%
5%
2%
4%
-2%
38%
Display P3 Coverage
66
90.6
37%
68.8
4%
66.9
1%
68.3
3%
60.9
-8%
86.9
32%
sRGB Coverage
83.7
99.9
19%
87.7
5%
85.2
2%
86.7
4%
84.2
1%
100
19%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.2
84.7
38%
64.1
5%
62.3
2%
63.4
4%
61.2
0%
99.4
62%
Response Times
59%
23%
19%
56%
48%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 ?(18, 27)
26 ?(12, 14)
42%
38 ?(13, 25)
16%
38 ?(14, 24)
16%
29 ?(13, 16)
36%
31 ?(11, 20)
31%
37 ?(13, 24)
18%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(6, 22)
7 ?(4, 3)
75%
20 ?(4, 16)
29%
22 ?(4, 18)
21%
7 ?(4, 3)
75%
10 ?(3, 7)
64%
24 ?(5, 19)
14%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-33%
2%
3%
-33%
-31%
13%
Brightness middle
380
307
-19%
306
-19%
328
-14%
299
-21%
343
-10%
336
-12%
Brightness
362
284
-22%
299
-17%
317
-12%
277
-23%
312
-14%
320
-12%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
88
-3%
87
-4%
80
-12%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.25
32%
0.27
27%
0.3
19%
0.27
27%
0.5
-35%
0.25
32%
Contrast
1027
1228
20%
1133
10%
1093
6%
1107
8%
686
-33%
1344
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.12
9.65
-134%
3.98
3%
3.74
9%
9.65
-134%
7.33
-78%
3.61
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.19
16.36
-100%
7.29
11%
8.97
-10%
15.43
-88%
10.79
-32%
6.02
26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.95
10.07
-155%
4.15
-5%
2.67
32%
9.68
-145%
7.6
-92%
4.78
-21%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.12 104%
2.45 90%
2.41 91%
1.89 116%
2.19 100%
2.32 95%
CCT
6539 99%
12145 54%
7386 88%
6861 95%
11652 56%
9024 72%
6185 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
75
36%
58
5%
56
2%
75
36%
55
0%
88
60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
100
19%
89
6%
85
1%
100
19%
84
0%
100
19%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
19% / -8%
10% / 5%
8% / 5%
9% / -14%
5% / -15%
22% / 18%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 6 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
45 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 18 ms subida
↘ 27 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 74 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
LatencyMon
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points 0%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
172 Points -7%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points -8%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
160 Points -13%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points -14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
899 Points +3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
864 Points -1%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points -8%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
789 Points -10%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points -16%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points -25%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points 0%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.95 Points -6%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.77 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.91 Points +4%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.6 Points +1%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points -7%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.63 Points -10%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points -14%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
7023 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
6038 Points -14%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5733 Points -18%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
27705 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
23393 Points -16%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22270 Points -20%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
300.8 Points
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
255.5 Points -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
247.6 Points -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
49518 Points
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38782 Points -22%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
37923 Points -23%
Cinebench R10 (normal operation)
Cinebench R10 (normal operation)
Cinebench R11.5 (normal operation)
Cinebench R11.5 (normal operation)
Cinebench R15 (normal operation)
Cinebench R15 (normal operation)
Cinebench R10 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R10 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R11.5 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R11.5 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R15 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R15 (Overclocking stage 2)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8465
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
27705
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7023
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
9160 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
35490 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8465 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
85.4 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.08 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
874 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
184 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120.8 fps
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5662 Points -5%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5575 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
5009 Points -16%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5846 Points -5%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5778 Points -6%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
5404 Points -12%
PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
7903 Points +3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
7667 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK, 2900 MHz, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
7635 Points 0%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6803 Points -11%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, 2800 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
6618 Points -14%
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5946 Points -22%
PCMark Vantage Result
31085 puntos
PCMark 7 Score
7667 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5975 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
9309 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6123 puntos
ayuda
M.2-SSD from Toshiba
M.2-SSD from Toshiba
SSD inside the system
SSD inside the system
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
49%
55%
9%
-52%
-1%
Read Seq
1494
3219
115%
3487
133%
1718
15%
521
-65%
1499
0%
Write Seq
1371
2572
88%
2690
96%
1305
-5%
311.8
-77%
1411
3%
Read 512
898
1776
98%
1499
67%
1250
39%
403.1
-55%
966
8%
Write 512
1273
2445
92%
2493
96%
1438
13%
332.3
-74%
1103
-13%
Read 4k
43.82
51.1
17%
53.7
23%
44.42
1%
33.35
-24%
44.33
1%
Write 4k
161.6
141.3
-13%
133.2
-18%
154.4
-4%
111.1
-31%
155.5
-4%
Read 4k QD32
669
658
-2%
795
19%
744
11%
331.1
-51%
696
4%
Write 4k QD32
552
554
0%
699
27%
578
5%
318.3
-42%
531
-4%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Sequential Read: 1494 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1371 MB/s
512K Read: 898 MB/s
512K Write: 1273 MB/s
4K Read: 43.82 MB/s
4K Write: 161.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 669 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 552 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver Stress test
3DMark Sky Diver Stress test
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark Vantage
3DMark06
3DMark06
3DMark05
3DMark05
3DMark03
3DMark03
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
23091 Points +2%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
22566 Points
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21026 Points -7%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17625 Points -22%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17068 Points -24%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16757 Points -26%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15718 Points -30%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
31412 Points +10%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28675 Points 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28595 Points
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23591 Points -17%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23170 Points -19%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
22282 Points -22%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21228 Points -26%
3DMark 03 Standard
181125 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard
37669 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39711 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
50346 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
20303 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
192504 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
33540 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17463 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
9502 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6606 puntos
ayuda
bajomedioaltoultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 324.3 284.5 273.7 176.8
GTA V (2015) 170.8 162.5 130.3 106.8 75.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 270.8 197.5 125.8 68.5 46.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 260.9 218.3 153.8 126.1 61.2
Far Cry Primal (2016) 157 138 125 107 49
The Division (2016) 258.8 201.6 122.4 97.2 48.4
Doom (2016) 179.9 170.2 149.1 147.8 70.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 145.9 136.9 98.9 54.9 34.4
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 462.9 353.4 269.3 234.1 78.5
For Honor (2017) 265.6 190.1 177.5 134.9 59.4
The cooling system consists of a total of three fans.
The cooling system...
The cooling system consists of a total of three fans.
...consists of...
The cooling system consists of a total of three fans.
...a total of...
The cooling system consists of a total of three fans.
...three fans.

Ruido

Ocioso
33 / 35 / 37 dB(A)
HDD
33 dB(A)
Carga
40 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise
-2%
-1%
5%
2%
-4%
-3%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
30
-0%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
33
34
-3%
30
9%
31
6%
34
-3%
33
-0%
33
-0%
Idle Average *
35
35
-0%
31
11%
32
9%
35
-0%
35
-0%
34
3%
Idle Maximum *
37
37
-0%
36
3%
33
11%
37
-0%
40
-8%
40
-8%
Load Average *
40
39
2%
47
-18%
40
-0%
37
7%
43
-8%
44
-10%
Load Maximum *
50
56
-12%
56
-12%
47
6%
44
12%
54
-8%
50
-0%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (normal operation)
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (normal operation)
Stress test: only Prime95 (normal operation)
Stress test: only Prime95 (normal operation)
Stress test: only FurMark (normal operation)
Stress test: only FurMark (normal operation)
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)
Stress test: FurMark + Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)
Stress test: only Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)
Stress test: only Prime95 (Overclocking stage 2)
Stress test: only FurMark (Overclocking stage 2)
Stress test: only FurMark (Overclocking stage 2)
Maximum load top (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load top (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load bottom (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load bottom (Optris PI 640)
Carga Máx.
 37.1 °C44.2 °C42.8 °C 
 36.9 °C39.8 °C38.7 °C 
 31.1 °C31.9 °C31.4 °C 
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
43 °C41.2 °C41.1 °C
34.9 °C34.5 °C28.5 °C
30.7 °C27.7 °C26.9 °C
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
Conector de corriente  38 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat
8%
0%
5%
8%
-3%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.2
39.8
10%
50.9
-15%
42.9
3%
41.5
6%
47.5
-7%
42.6
4%
Maximum Bottom *
43
47.8
-11%
44.6
-4%
41.5
3%
50.6
-18%
54.5
-27%
44.9
-4%
Idle Upper Side *
32.4
27.1
16%
29.9
8%
31.6
2%
26.4
19%
28.6
12%
33.1
-2%
Idle Bottom *
32.8
27.4
16%
28.8
12%
29.5
10%
25.4
23%
28.8
12%
28.9
12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.346.62539.2423130.133.34037.639.85031.735.8633138.98031.446.110029.849.712523.753.916022.262.520020.773.225021.174.331520.876.140019.577.350019.276.163018.77380018.972.1100019.277.8125018.975.8160019.472.8200018.168.9250017.474.1315017.578.5400017.572500017.571.7630017.571.3800017.666.21000017.662.81250017.661.11600017.552.7SPL30.586.1N1.473median 18.9median 72.8Delta1.55.832.236.529.236.429.638.427.337.22640.525.544.225.347.824.55724.66425.267.222.169.821.865.82171.520.474.719.57418.874.118.677.61981.119.481.118.979.117.88317.784.517.684.917.582.617.47917.478.517.478.517.572.217.363.617.253.630.593.11.4102median 18.8median 77.61.66.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DLMSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 27 / 32 / 41 Watt
Carga midlight 102 / 248 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption
-7%
-1%
10%
22%
-2%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
27
29
-7%
24
11%
24
11%
20
26%
29
-7%
25
7%
Idle Average *
32
35
-9%
31
3%
31
3%
27
16%
31
3%
35
-9%
Idle Maximum *
41
40
2%
38
7%
36
12%
31
24%
38
7%
46
-12%
Load Average *
102
94
8%
98
4%
94
8%
86
16%
111
-9%
103
-1%
Load Maximum *
248
315
-27%
320
-29%
204
18%
184
26%
253
-2%
223
10%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

The 88.8 Wh lithium-ion battery is secured by screws.
The 88.8 Wh lithium-ion battery is secured by screws.
Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi runtime
Wi-Fi runtime
H.264 runtime
H.264 runtime
Charging
Charging
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
5h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
4h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 24min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 30min
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 93 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh
Duración de Batería
-33%
-1%
-8%
2%
-27%
-11%
Reader / Idle
313
342
9%
311
-1%
316
1%
278
-11%
H.264
204
145
-29%
186
-9%
228
12%
WiFi v1.3
251
160
-36%
241
-4%
210
-16%
230
-8%
182
-27%
200
-20%
Load
90
83
-8%
84
-7%
91
1%
89
-1%

Pro

+ teclado iluminado (4 zonas)
+ buena distribución de puertos
+ display IPS con G-Sync
+ USB 3.1 Gen. 2 incl. Thunderbolt
+ altísimo rendimiento de sistema
+ convincente rendimiento gaming
+ buena calidad de construcción
+ buenos dispositivos de entrada
+ teclas macro
+ SSD PCIe

Contra

- batería se drena bajo carga fuerte (enchufado)
- ralentización CPU & GPU bajo carga máxima
- sin unidad óptica
- pesado adaptador de corriente
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL. Modelo de prueba cortesía de Acer Alemania.
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL. Modelo de prueba cortesía de Acer Alemania.

El Predator 17 X es una buena alternativa al Predator 17 "normal", aunque Acer no haya arreglado todos los defectos. El rendimiento queda libre de toda queja: La Intel Core i7-7820HK es una buena pareja para la Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080. Podemos ver récords en algunas pruebas, por lo que ciertamente es una máquina gaming potente. El diseño es similar al de otros modelos Predator.

Acer tiene un nuevo contendiente para el segmento gaming de gama alta. El Predator 17 X es una potente máquina gaming y un serio rival para los sistemas familiares.

Nos gustaron los buenos dispositivos de entrada así como la calidad de construcción del chasis, pero el display nos deja con sentimientos encontrados. La iluminación es buena, pero los tiempos de respuesta son elevados. Otro aspecto positivo es el overclocking, que mejora mucho el rendimiento. El procesador alcanza su límite térmico un poco pronto, pero elr endimiento sigue siendo superior al valor por defecto.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL - 03/01/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Ratón
83%
Conectividad
70 / 81 → 86%
Peso
46 / 10-66 → 64%
Battería
73%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
99%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
100%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Ruido
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
78%
Médio
80%
87%
Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Acer Predator 17 X (7820HK, FHD, GTX 1080)
Sebastian Bade, 2017-03-20 (Update: 2017-03-20)