Breve análisis del Acer Swift 7 SF713-51

Name: Acer Swift 7 SF713-51
Brand: Acer

Delgado, más delgado, ¡Acer Swift 7! La tendencia hacia los dispositivos más delgados sigue avanzando. Acer ha creado ahora el portátil más delgado del mundo: menos de 10 mm de grosor. Veremos qué tan bien funciona el SoC dual-core Kaby Lake en nuestro análisis.

Sebastian Bade (traducido por Francisco García), Published 12/18/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 (Swift 7 Serie)

Procesador

Intel Core i5-7Y54 2 x 1.2 - 3.2 GHz, Kaby Lake

Adaptador gráfico

Intel HD Graphics 615, Núcleo: 950 MHz, 21.20.16.4494

Memoría

8 GB

, LPDDR3, 1866 MHz, Dual-Channel

pantalla

13.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 166 PPI, Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, IPS, WLED, CineCrystal, lustroso: si

Placa base

Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH

Disco duro

Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, 256 GB

, 256GB SSD Serial ATA/300, 202 GB libre

Tarjeta de sonido

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexiones

2 USB 3.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Brightness Sensor

Equipamento de red

Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 9.98 x 324.6 x 229.6

Battería

41.58 Wh, 2700 mAh Litio-Polimero, 4 cells

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 1.3M

Características adicionales

Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, adaptador USB Type C a USB 3.0, 24 Meses Garantía, fanless

Peso

1.1 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 293 g

Precio

1299 EUR

Enlaces

Acer Pagina de inicio
Acer sección de portatiles

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HP Spectre 13 Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	673 MBit/s
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	638 MBit/s -5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	609 MBit/s -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s -15%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)	482 MBit/s -28%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	642 MBit/s
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (jseb)	596 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	500 MBit/s -22%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	421 MBit/s -34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s -38%


347 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	352 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
332 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	337 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 344.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.7 cd/m²
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 359 cd/m²
Contraste: 1436:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440, 12"	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display		5%	-29%	-6%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	64.6	66.8 3%	44.45 -31%	59.1 -9%	61.5 -5%
sRGB Coverage	89.1	95.4 7%	65.2 -27%	85.5 -4%	89.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.8	68 5%	45.96 -29%	61 -6%	62.9 -3%
Response Times		-23%	4%	-12%	-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	31 ?(14, 17)	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) -33%	32 ?(14.8, 17.2) -3%	38 ?(24, 14, Spikes in between) -23%	51 ?(13, 38) -65%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(7, 20)	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -13%	24 ?(12.4, 11.6) 11%	27 ?(13, 14, Spikes in between) -0%	26 ?(6, 20) 4%
PWM Frequency				1429 ?(20)
Screen		8%	-12%	-15%	-47%
Brightness middle	359	387 8%	289 -19%	390 9%	344 -4%
Brightness	344	358 4%	298 -13%	352 2%	292 -15%
Brightness Distribution	92	88 -4%	87 -5%	81 -12%	72 -22%
Black Level *	0.25	0.47 -88%	0.27 -8%	0.69 -176%	0.26 -4%
Contrast	1436	823 -43%	1070 -25%	565 -61%	1323 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.57	1.6 65%	4.82 -5%	3.04 33%	12.65 -177%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.25	4 57%	10.73 -16%	7.01 24%	17.8 -92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	1 81%	3.84 26%	2.88 45%	12.95 -149%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.26 ^97%	2.41 ^91%	2.43 ^91%	1.33 ^165%
CCT	6887 ^94%	6680 ^97%	6492 ^100%	6848 ^95%	6441 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	58	61.6 6%	42.03 -28%	55 -5%	58 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	89	82.2 -8%	64.8 -27%	85 -4%	89 0%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-3% / 3%	-12% / -13%	-11% / -12%	-27% / -36%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 7 ms subida
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 20 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
31 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 14 ms subida
31 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 17 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 37 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms).

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz	111 Points 0%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	111 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	111 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	100 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	91 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	90 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz	250 Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	218 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	214 Points +3%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	207 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	205 Points -1%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	1.28 Points +1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	1.27 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	1.27 Points 0%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	1 Points -21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	0.95 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	2.47 Points +6%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	2.35 Points +1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	2.29 Points -1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	2.32 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	2.27 Points -2%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	5646 Points +2%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	5545 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	9681 Points +11%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	8756 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	198.2 Points +7%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	188 Points +2%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	184.5 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	143 Points -22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	130.7 Points -29%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz	115 Points -38%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	29889 Points +16%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	27627 Points +7%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	25796 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz	23217 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	21739 Points -16%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	18464 Points -28%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	1770 ms * -35%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz	1663 ms * -27%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	1309 ms *
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz	1286 ms * +2%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz	1255 ms * +4%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz	1161 ms * +11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7323

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

6854

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4392

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

7445 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

8756 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

5545 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.32 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

26.19 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.27 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

207 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

111 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

31.67 fps

ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	3064 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3037 Points -1%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	2979 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	2614 Points -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30, 900 MHz, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -17%
Storage Score v2
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	4885 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	4876 Points 0%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54, 1100 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3430 Points 0%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54, 1200 MHz, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	3429 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75, 1200 MHz, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	3298 Points -4%

PCMark Vantage Result		12765 puntos
PCMark 7 Score		4857 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3064 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3429 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		34%	144%	6%	4%
Read Seq	431.2	754 75%	1482 244%	475.2 10%	472.6 10%
Write Seq	401	638 59%	1232 207%	423.7 6%	407.7 2%
Read 512	283.7	616 117%	1191 320%	404.8 43%	309.5 9%
Write 512	313.6	678 116%	1220 289%	396.2 26%	368.5 18%
Read 4k	36.62	14.6 -60%	46.96 28%	28.57 -22%	37.57 3%
Write 4k	76.1	20.5 -73%	100.7 32%	90.7 19%	75.5 -1%
Read 4k QD32	329.4	464 41%	464 41%	288.9 -12%	324.8 -1%
Write 4k QD32	325.6	315 -3%	292.1 -10%	242.3 -26%	307.4 -6%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG

Sequential Read: 431.2 MB/s

Sequential Write: 401 MB/s

512K Read: 283.7 MB/s

512K Write: 313.6 MB/s

4K Read: 36.62 MB/s

4K Write: 76.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 329.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 325.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 06

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	7035 Points +27%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points +10%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	5541 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	5478 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	4286 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	844 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points +14%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	647 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	507 Points -22%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	41566 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	37865 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	35580 Points -14%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1254 Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points +14%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	1083 Points +4%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1039 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1032 Points -1%
1280x720 Performance
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1360 Points +19%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1277 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	1188 Points +4%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1143 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1141 Points 0%

3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6921 Points +10%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	6299 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	5860 Points -7%

3DMark 2001SE Standard		19381 puntos
3DMark 03 Standard		16620 puntos
3DMark 05 Standard		8649 puntos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		6299 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result		4081 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance		1143 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		41566 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4113 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		582 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		274 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score		239 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
World of Warcraft (2005)	88.9	83.2	60.9	7.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)	40.6	22.4	17.8	6
Battlefield 4 (2013)	29.4	18.3	17.6
Sims 4 (2014)	147.3	90	41.5	28.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	59.1	52.7	27.4	25.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	13	8

	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
Heat		-7%	-10%	8%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	45.7	39 15%	42.7 7%	39.1 14%	46.5 -2%
Maximum Bottom *	48.7	44 10%	45.8 6%	38.7 21%	45 8%
Idle Upper Side *	25.5	32 -25%	32.1 -26%	26 -2%	27.6 -8%
Idle Bottom *	25.2	32 -27%	32.3 -28%	25.7 -2%	27.1 -8%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


35.9 °C	45.7 °C	41.8 °C
29.6 °C	34.2 °C	31.2 °C
27.4 °C	26.2 °C	28.2 °C

Máximo: 45.7 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C


38 °C	48.7 °C	37.9 °C
32.1 °C	34.6 °C	31.5 °C
28.9 °C	28.7 °C	28.3 °C

Máximo: 48.7 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C

Conector de corriente 44.8 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).

... to the left and the right of the battery.

The bottom has an opening for the speakers.

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.5 / 0.6 Watt
Ocioso	4.1 / 6.4 / 6.8 Watt
Carga	16 / 18.7 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption		8%	-20%	-17%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	4.1	2.7 34%	4.3 -5%	4.2 -2%	4.3 -5%
Idle Average *	6.4	2.7 58%	6 6%	8.4 -31%	7.4 -16%
Idle Maximum *	6.8	7.2 -6%	6.4 6%	8.9 -31%	8 -18%
Load Average *	16	22 -38%	22.7 -42%	15.9 1%	22.1 -38%
Load Maximum *	18.7	20.5 -10%	31.2 -67%	22.5 -20%	21.7 -16%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

AufladezeitaCharging time. — Charging time.

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		13h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 50min
Carga (máximo brillo)		3h 02min

	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh	Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh
Duración de Batería		22%	-17%	6%	-9%
Reader / Idle	792		526 -34%	1013 28%	748 -6%
H.264	410	512 25%	413 1%	418 2%
WiFi v1.3	438	501 14%	355 -19%	402 -8%	391 -11%
Load	182	231 27%	152 -16%	182 0%	163 -10%

Pro

+ 9.98 mm es bastante delgado

+ diseño estiloso con bonitos colores

+ relativamente ligero

+ buen aguante de batería

+ decente rendimiento de sistema

+ gran touchpad

+ dispaly IPS con ángulos de visión estables

+ silencioso en inactivo

+ adaptador para USB 3.1 Type C a USB 3.0

Contra

- sólo 2 puertos USB 3.1 Type-C

- muy fácil de manchasre

- sin teclado retroiluminado

Acer Swift 7. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Acer Alemania.

Con 9.98 mm de grosor, el Acer Swift 7 es el modelo más delgado del mundo. El esquema de color negro-dorado pinta bien y la carcasa itene un tacto genial. La construcción superplana es fácil de manejar. En general, Acer ha producido un buen portátil. La manufactura es impecable y el rendimiento es bueno (habida cuenta las limitaciones de la carcasa). A fecha de testeo, el portátil cuesta 1,300 Euros.

El Acer Swift 7 es un portátil de gran calidad, que fue fiable en nuestro uso y nuestros tests. El hardware es bueno y asegura que el sistema irá fluido.

Los compradores deberían ser conscientes de que el rendimiento es un factor decisorio para el Acer Swift 7. Los juegos 3D apenas van en este portátil. Tampoco se puede hacer edición de vídeo. Son debilidades definidas en nuestro modelo de pruebas. Sin embargo, no eran esos los objetivos del Acer Swift 7. El genial panel IPS y un bajo consumo/aguante de batería relativamente largo (hasta 7 horas) ofrecen al usuario un portátil portable de buen aspecto.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 - 12/19/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabado

92 / 98 → 94%

Teclado

81%

Ratón

83%

Conectividad

35 / 80 → 44%

Peso

74 / 35-78 → 91%