Breve analisis del Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Connectivity
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Acer Chromebook C740-C3DY | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q (seb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q (seb) |
|
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 180 cd/m²
Contraste: 574:1 (Negro: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.71 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.04% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q TN LED, 1366x768 | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K TN LED, 1366x768 | Medion Akoya S2015 Chromebook TN LED, 1366x768 | HP Stream 11-r000ng TN, 1366x768 | Lenovo S21e-20 80M4004MGE TN, 1366x768 | Dell Inspiron 11 3162 TN LED, 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | 1% | -3% | -8% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 42.04 | 39.91 -5% | 42.52 1% | 40.64 -3% | 38.7 -8% | |
sRGB Coverage | 62.9 | 59.9 -5% | 63.5 1% | 61.2 -3% | 58.1 -8% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.46 | 41.25 -5% | 43.97 1% | 41.99 -3% | 39.98 -8% | |
Response Times | -3% | 14% | 4% | 7% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 46 ? -21% | 40 ? -5% | 44 ? -16% | 40 ? -5% | 41 ? -8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 26 ? 16% | 21 ? 32% | 24 ? 23% | 25 ? 19% | 24 ? 23% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 198 ? | ||||
Screen | -3% | -14% | 2% | -10% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 218 | 271 24% | 227 4% | 264 21% | 240 10% | 255 17% |
Brightness | 215 | 258 20% | 216 0% | 248 15% | 225 5% | 236 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 90 6% | 84 -1% | 90 6% | 75 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.58 -53% | 0.62 -63% | 0.5 -32% | 0.61 -61% | 0.64 -68% |
Contrast | 574 | 467 -19% | 366 -36% | 528 -8% | 393 -32% | 398 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.29 | 10.29 -0% | 9.78 5% | 11.23 -9% | 8.91 13% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.68 | 16.39 7% | 19.44 -10% | 13.52 24% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.71 | 11.78 -1% | 11.27 4% | 11.16 5% | 12.33 -5% | 9.87 16% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.52 87% | 2.41 91% | 2.44 90% | 2.5 88% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 14164 46% | 13438 48% | 12875 50% | 12954 50% | 14130 46% | 10232 64% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 38.1 -5% | 41 3% | 39 -2% | 37 -7% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 60 -5% | 63 0% | 61 -3% | 58 -8% | |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -4% /
-4% | 0% /
-7% | 2% /
2% | -2% /
-6% | -2% /
-4% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
31 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida | |
↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 82 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 51 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Acer Chromebook C740-C3DY | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
Medion Akoya S2015 Chromebook | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1999 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1936 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1594 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
HP Stream 11-r000ng | |
Lenovo S21e-20 80M4004MGE | |
Medion Akoya S2218 |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Liteonit CV3-8D256 | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K 32 GB eMMC Flash | HP Stream 11-r000ng 32 GB eMMC Flash | Medion Akoya S2218 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo S21e-20 80M4004MGE 32 GB eMMC Flash | Dell Inspiron 11 3162 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -69% | -65% | -73% | -65% | -75% | |
Read Seq | 506 | 172.4 -66% | 154.2 -70% | 140.2 -72% | 175.5 -65% | 158.4 -69% |
Write Seq | 393.4 | 78.4 -80% | 76.6 -81% | 52.7 -87% | 69.1 -82% | 20.58 -95% |
Read 512 | 329.1 | 156.3 -53% | 165.8 -50% | 98.4 -70% | 166.6 -49% | 158.8 -52% |
Write 512 | 282.5 | 65.2 -77% | 59.9 -79% | 58.7 -79% | 50.1 -82% | 30.91 -89% |
Read 4k | 23.35 | 17.69 -24% | 18.25 -22% | 15.25 -35% | 19.35 -17% | 11.74 -50% |
Write 4k | 45.56 | 7.842 -83% | 13.16 -71% | 9.817 -78% | 11.12 -76% | 10.66 -77% |
Read 4k QD32 | 123.5 | 28.3 -77% | 46.51 -62% | 37.24 -70% | 52 -58% | 31.3 -75% |
Write 4k QD32 | 111.2 | 7.399 -93% | 13.21 -88% | 8.734 -92% | 10.96 -90% | 10.2 -91% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3566 puntos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 2081 puntos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 537 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 26768 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2392 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 259 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
HP Stream 11-r000ng | |
Lenovo S21e-20 80M4004MGE |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 35.4 | 14.7 | ||
Diablo III (2012) | 32 | 19.1 | 14.4 | |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 42.6 | 32 | 20.4 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 27.8 | 12.8 | 9.5 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 22.2 | 11.4 | 9.2 | |
GRID: Autosport (2014) | 50.5 | 15 | ||
Sims 4 (2014) | 77.5 | 19.6 | ||
F1 2014 (2014) | 28 | 17 | ||
Dirt Rally (2015) | 41.5 | 12.5 | ||
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 18.8 | 13 | ||
World of Warships (2015) | 21.8 | 16.2 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F, ranging from 21.6 to 53.2 °C for the class Netbook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.8 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.3 °C / 84.7 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.2 / 8 / 8.6 Watt |
Carga |
13.5 / 13.8 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Acer Chromebook C740-C3DY | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Dell Inspiron 11 3162 | |
HP Stream 11-r000ng | |
Medion Akoya S2015 Chromebook | |
Medion Akoya S2218 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 11 AO1-131-C58K | |
Lenovo S21e-20 80M4004MGE |
Pro
Contra
El pequeño portátil Acer se ha hecho para su uso en instituciones educativas. La robusta carcasa lo demuestra. El procesador instalado tiene bastante potencia de cálculo para las aplicaciones básicas de oficina e internet. El portátil siempre va en silencio y no se calienta demasiado. El rápido SSD asegura un sistema veloz. Se puede cambiar fácilmente el SSD ya que el TravelMate tiene una escotilla de mantenimiento. El aguante de batería es sobresaliente. Esto se complementa con un teclado decentísimo. La garantía de fabricante de tres años no debería quedar sin mencionar. EL punto débil del portátil vuelve a ser la pantalla; Acer instala un modelo oscuro y dependiente del ángulo de visión.
Acer tiene en su línea una máquina de escribir y navegar compacta y muy duradera en el TravelMate que debería atraer a muchos estudiantes.
Sin embargo, nuestro modelo de pruebas no es precisamente una ganga a 550 Euros. El SSD y dos sistemas operativos Windows se reflejan en el precio. Para ahorrar dinero, puede merecer la pena echar un vistazo al modelo B117-M-P12K. Viene con un HDD convencional (500 GB) y sin sistema operativo Windows. Súmale el coste de una licencia usada de Windows 7 y el precio sube a unos 330 Euros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
- 09/27/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck