Breve análisis del Acer TravelMate TMX349-G2-M-5625
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 774:1 (Negro: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.26% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.81% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 ChiMei CN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | -1% | 3% | -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.81 | 37.6 -10% | 41.23 -1% | 42.88 3% | 36.97 -12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.3 | 56.6 -9% | 61.4 -1% | 64.1 3% | 55.6 -11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.26 | 38.85 -10% | 42.67 -1% | 44.3 2% | 38.2 -12% |
| Response Times | 12% | 5% | -29% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 43.2 ? -0% | 40.8 ? 5% | 45 ? -5% | 42 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 24.4 ? 24% | 30.4 ? 5% | 26 ? 19% | 28 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 50 ? -100% | |||
| Screen | -31% | -6% | 14% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 216 -20% | 244 -10% | 257 -5% | 230 -15% |
| Brightness | 253 | 203 -20% | 231 -9% | 263 4% | 226 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 83 0% | 89 7% | 90 8% | 86 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.47 -34% | 0.37 -6% | 0.24 31% | 0.2 43% |
| Contrast | 774 | 460 -41% | 659 -15% | 1071 38% | 1150 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 8.98 -78% | 6.41 -27% | 5.44 -8% | 5.07 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.74 | 14.07 -20% | 13.4 -14% | 10.93 7% | 10.07 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 9.61 -123% | 5.94 -38% | 3.95 8% | 3.64 15% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.63 84% | 2.28 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6726 97% | 11265 58% | 6101 107% | 6896 94% | 6521 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42 | 35.9 -15% | 39.3 -6% | 40 -5% | 35 -17% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 39 | 56.7 45% | 61.1 57% | 64 64% | 55 41% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -10% /
-21% | -1% /
-4% | -4% /
4% | 2% /
7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 13 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 43 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 25 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 25000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 20 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 25000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3668 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4531 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4574 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -47% | -37% | -26% | -28% | |
| Read Seq | 1818 | 491.2 -73% | 476.5 -74% | 510 -72% | 484.1 -73% |
| Write Seq | 582 | 322.2 -45% | 458.7 -21% | 458.8 -21% | 449.8 -23% |
| Read 512 | 1134 | 310.1 -73% | 346.4 -69% | 399.7 -65% | 399.1 -65% |
| Write 512 | 586 | 276 -53% | 291.1 -50% | 299.3 -49% | 355.1 -39% |
| Read 4k | 34.93 | 19.57 -44% | 35.15 1% | 35.27 1% | 33.44 -4% |
| Write 4k | 133.4 | 77.8 -42% | 78.8 -41% | 90.2 -32% | 67.5 -49% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 373.7 | 146.3 -61% | 276 -26% | 397.7 6% | 368.5 -1% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 210.8 | 241.4 15% | 178.3 -15% | 257.3 22% | 280.6 33% |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57937 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6262 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Battlefield 4 - 1024x768 Low Preset | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61 | 30.8 | 26.5 | 7.69 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 38.7 | 25.5 | 18.4 | 6.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.3 | 12 | 6 | 4.4 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.8 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 31.6 / 33.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).
Acer TravelMate X349-G2 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 7 / 8.8 Watt |
| Carga |
36.6 / 33.8 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -7% | 8% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3 27% | 2.7 34% | 3.9 5% | 4.9 -20% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 5.4 23% | 5.5 21% | 7.1 -1% | 7.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 6.3 28% | 6.5 26% | 8.8 -0% | 9.4 -7% |
| Load Average * | 36.6 | 37.5 -2% | 44.2 -21% | 27.6 25% | 26 29% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 61.1 -81% | 65.2 -93% | 30.2 11% | 36 -7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer TravelMate X349-G2 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48.9 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 30% | 12% | -9% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 829 | 1083 31% | 1043 26% | 638 -23% | 675 -19% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 456 | 414 -9% | 326 -29% | 384 -16% | 392 -14% |
| Load | 90 | 151 68% | 124 38% | 100 11% | 109 21% |
Pro
Contra
El Acer TravelMate TMX349 es un subportátil gama media adecuado para pequeñas oficinas y estudiantes. Gracias a su cómodo peso y al buen aguante de bateŕia es ideal para el uso móvil. La pantalla contribuye a ello, aunque el brillo máximo podría ser algo mayor. Con 8 GB de RAM y 256 GB de almacenamiento, está bien preparado para su propósito. A diferencia de Alemania, actualmente no hay opción de 512 GB en USA.
Para los que guste tener muchas ventanas abiertas y muchas pestañas en el navegador, 8 GB de RAM ayuda a suavizar la experiencia de usuario. La calidad de construcicón es buena y resistente gracias a la carcasa de aluminio. El rendimiento del procesador ha aumentado y está más o menos al nivel del top model del año pasado, pero con un precio 200-300 Euros más barato. Durante la operación Wi-Fi, la batería aguanta casi toda la jornada. La pantalla mate permite el uso en exteriores. En general, Acer ha hecho un buen dispositivo - a un precio atractivo.
Acer ha logrado mejorar un producto que ya era convincente el año pasado con nuevos procesdaores y un turbo-SSD.
Sólo h ay algunos detalles, como el lector de tarjetas nada convincente, o el muy audible ventilador durante las tareas pesadas para el CPU, que enturbian la buena impresión general del TravelMate.
Si quieres ahorrar algo y no te hace falta tener 20 pestañas de navegador abiertas y almacenas todas tus fotos en un disco externo, puede irte bien con uno de los modelos más baratos con procesador i3. Empiezan en unos 600 Euros.
Si buscas una máquina delgada, robusta, de rendimiento para trabajar fuera con bastantes reservas para los próximos años, puedes llevarte este fácilmente por unos $780 (256 GB SSD).
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer TravelMate X349-G2
- 04/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar
Price comparison
