Breve análisis del Asus ROG Strix GL502VM
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T |
|
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 321 cd/m²
Contraste: 973:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 12% | -1% | -17% | 11% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 64.5 0% | 67.8 5% | 63 -2% | 59.9 -7% 40.34 -37% | 66.7 3% | 64.5 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 83.4 | 83.1 0% | 97.4 17% | 82.2 -1% | 85.9 3% 60.3 -28% | 97.7 17% | 83.4 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.9 | 60.8 0% | 69.7 14% | 60.1 -1% | 61.6 1% 41.73 -31% | 68.4 12% | 61 0% |
Response Times | 7% | -4% | -2% | -31% | -54% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 38 ? 5% | 43 ? -8% | 55 ? -38% | 56.4 ? -41% | 36 ? 10% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 23 ? 8% | 26 ? -4% | 24 ? 4% | 31 ? -24% | 41.6 ? -66% | 23 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 202 ? | 201.6 ? | |||||
Screen | -3% | 5% | -7% | -28% | -14% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 321 | 315 -2% | 293 -9% | 302 -6% | 214 -33% | 296.8 -8% | 288 -10% |
Brightness | 296 | 290 -2% | 279 -6% | 287 -3% | 203 -31% | 282 -5% | 292 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 84 -5% | 91 3% | 79 -10% | 86 -2% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.32 3% | 0.33 -0% | 0.36 -9% | 0.28 15% | 0.347 -5% | 0.3 9% |
Contrast | 973 | 984 1% | 888 -9% | 839 -14% | 764 -21% | 855 -12% | 960 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.42 | 4.88 -10% | 3.59 19% | 4.93 -12% | 6.04 -37% | 5.24 -19% | 5.1 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.78 | 8.88 9% | 5.79 41% | 12.34 -26% | 12 -23% | 11.36 -16% | 9.44 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.34 | 4.17 -25% | 3.86 -16% | 3.47 -4% | 5.91 -77% | 6.76 -102% | 4.43 -33% |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.53 87% | 2.53 87% | 2.16 102% | 2.44 90% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6213 105% | 6683 97% | 7229 90% | 6622 98% | 7362 88% | 8467 77% | 6687 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 55 0% | 63 15% | 54 -2% | 38 -31% | 62.8 14% | 55 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 83 0% | 97 17% | 82 -1% | 60 -28% | 98.1 18% | 83 0% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 1% /
-1% | 4% /
6% | -3% /
-5% | -25% /
-24% | -19% /
-14% | 1% /
-2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5 ms subida | |
↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15 ms subida | |
↘ 25 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
PCMark 7 Score | 6527 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4741 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7095 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5109 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 163% | 16% | -16% | -19% | 160% | |
Read Seq | 462.5 | 1973 327% | 510 10% | 475.7 3% | 485.4 5% | 1857 302% |
Write Seq | 462.7 | 1292 179% | 455.3 -2% | 169.2 -63% | 312.4 -32% | 1240 168% |
Read 512 | 335 | 1279 282% | 415.9 24% | 327.6 -2% | 294.8 -12% | 971 190% |
Write 512 | 407.1 | 1288 216% | 422.3 4% | 169.6 -58% | 287.8 -29% | 1239 204% |
Read 4k | 25.61 | 52.3 104% | 32.46 27% | 33.14 29% | 21.44 -16% | 54.1 111% |
Write 4k | 86.3 | 153.2 78% | 92.5 7% | 81.4 -6% | 75.7 -12% | 167.4 94% |
Read 4k QD32 | 246.7 | 464.4 88% | 358.6 45% | 276.8 12% | 149.4 -39% | 695 182% |
Write 4k QD32 | 301.5 | 384.4 27% | 329.1 9% | 168 -44% | 256.3 -15% | 386.8 28% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27436 puntos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12682 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 104690 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23340 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9663 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5100 puntos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3613 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 395.7 | 342.8 | 293.4 | 144.9 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 212.1 | 176.7 | 168.6 | 102.3 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 199.4 | 197.6 | 188 | 99.8 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 109 | 87 | 78 | 60 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 73.7 | 72.1 | 58.3 | 56 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 70.4 | 61.8 | 57.4 | |
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 143.8 | 143.5 | 87.1 | 78.5 |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 123.1 | 123.3 | 99.2 | 86.5 |
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 89.3 | 82.7 | 69.4 | 58.7 |
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 109.1 | 94.9 | 65.4 | 44.1 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 |
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 44 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 7% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 31 | 30 3% | 30 3% | 30 3% | 28.7 7% | 30 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 32 -0% | 32 -0% | 31 3% | 32 -0% | 31 3% | 31 3% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 33 -0% | 32 3% | 33 -0% | 31 6% | 32 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 34 -0% | 34 -0% | 36 -6% | 36 -6% | 32 6% | 38 -12% |
Load Average * | 44 | 39 11% | 37 16% | 40 9% | 43 2% | 40.7 7% | 46 -5% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 51 4% | 46 13% | 47 11% | 49 8% | 47.6 10% | 49 8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 65.3 °C / 150 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64.4 °C / 148 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.8 °C / 8.6 F).
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | 19% | 32% | 18% | 3% | 15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 65.3 | 48 26% | 45.3 31% | 42.6 35% | 48.5 26% | 61.4 6% | 49.3 25% |
Maximum Bottom * | 64.4 | 46.8 27% | 62.6 3% | 38.7 40% | 59 8% | 70.2 -9% | 52.7 18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35.4 | 33.7 5% | 25.3 29% | 27.2 23% | 28.7 19% | 29.6 16% | 32.6 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.6 | 30.5 3% | 27.3 14% | 22.8 28% | 25.7 19% | 32 -1% | 29.5 7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 16 / 19 / 23 Watt |
Carga |
68 / 157 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -24% | -15% | -0% | 25% | 7% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16 | 20 -25% | 18 -13% | 12 25% | 7 56% | 11.1 31% | 11 31% |
Idle Average * | 19 | 24 -26% | 22 -16% | 16 16% | 11 42% | 14.1 26% | 16 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 29 -26% | 30 -30% | 22 4% | 19 17% | 18.4 20% | 21 9% |
Load Average * | 68 | 86 -26% | 77 -13% | 96 -41% | 79 -16% | 96.5 -42% | 80 -18% |
Load Maximum * | 157 | 183 -17% | 165 -5% | 166 -6% | 119 24% | 159.5 -2% | 174 -11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 64 Wh | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro 65 Wh | Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 61.5 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 60 Wh | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 3% | 116% | 21% | 37% | -22% | 32% | 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 315 | 358 14% | 467 48% | 584 85% | 243 -23% | 409 30% | 353 12% | |
H.264 | 235 | 271 15% | 244 4% | 262 11% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 220 | 210 -5% | 476 116% | 272 24% | 356 62% | 196 -11% | 274 25% | 250 14% |
Load | 87 | 76 -13% | 93 7% | 56 -36% | 58 -33% | 123 41% | 87 0% |
Pro
Contra
El Asus GL502VM es un delgado portátil gaming de 15.6".
El potente hardware permite que este modelo ejecute la mayoría de juegos en ajustes altos o máximos. Además, Nvidia G-Sync permite un procesado de frames más fluido. Bajo carga, el portátil se vuelve muy ruidoso y la carcasa se calienta notablemente. En general, nos gusta el GL502VM más que el GL502VS. Parece que la gráfica más potente del GL502VS es en ocasiones demasiado exigente para el adaptador. Esto agota rápido la bateria. Por suerte, nuestro modelo de pruebas no muestra este comportamiento.
Un veloz SSD se asegura de que el sistema vaya bien. Un HDD De 1 TB ofrece almacenamiento suficiente para los juegos y sendos discos se pueden cambiar. Hay que sacar la parte inferior del portátil para este procedimiento. La pantalla mate IPS ofrece buenos ángulos de visión estables y buenos valores. El teclado bastará para el uso doméstico, pero los mecanógrafos mejor buscan otra cosa.
Si te gustan los modelos más grandes, el GL702VM es el hermano de 17.3" de nuestro modelo de pruebas: es más silencioso y se calienta menos. Lo que es más, la configuración analizada tenía un puerto Thunderbolt 3, algo que le falta al GL502VM que tenemos ante nosotros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
- 12/10/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck