Breve análisis del Asus X555DA (A10-8700P, FHD)

Name: Asus X555DA-BB11
Brand: Asus

Lento y anticuado. La plataforma Carrizo de AMD no ha envejecido bien. Su rendimiento es inferior al de los procesadores de la gama U de Intel y ofrecen peor experiencia y duración de batería.

Allen Ngo (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), Published 04/16/2017 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...

Carrizo AMD Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus X555DA-BB11 (X555 Serie)

Procesador

AMD A10-8700P 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo

Adaptador gráfico

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) - 512 MB VRAM, Núcleo: 626 MHz, Memoría: 667 MHz, DDR3, 15.201.1101.1002

Memoría

8 GB

, 4 GB soldered + 4 GB DDR3 SODIMM, Dual-Channel, 1066.7 MHz, 9-9-9-24

pantalla

15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, TN LED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, ID: AUO38ED, lustroso: no

Placa base

AMD CZ FCH

Disco duro

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm

Tarjeta de sonido

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexiones

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader

Equipamento de red

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidad óptica

TSSTcorp CDDVDW SU-228HB

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25.8 x 382 x 256

Battería

37 Wh Litio-Polimero, 2-cell

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.3 MP

Características adicionales

Altavoces: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Avast SecureLine, Asus Smart Gesture, AMD Catalyst Control Center, 12 Meses Garantía

Peso

2.132 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 242 g

Precio

420 USD

Enlaces

Asus Pagina de inicio
Asus sección de portatiles

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Asus X555LN-XO112H Asus X555DA-BB11 Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock

Right: SD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 2.0, Optical drive

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV	71.2 MB/s +186%
Asus X555DA-BB11	24.9 MB/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V	22.7 MB/s -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV	90.4 MB/s +237%
Asus X555DA-BB11	26.8 MB/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V	26.6 MB/s -1%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	532 MBit/s +170%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	341 MBit/s +73%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	197 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	635 MBit/s +86%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	341 MBit/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	310 MBit/s -9%


223.2 cd/m²	235.9 cd/m²	222.4 cd/m²
216.4 cd/m²	242.7 cd/m²	220.9 cd/m²
241.6 cd/m²	243.6 cd/m²	244.8 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 244.8 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 232.4 cd/m² Minimum: 10.74 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 242.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 467:1 (Negro: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Toshiba, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus X555LN-XO112H AU Optronics B156XW04 V6, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768
Display		16%	6%	8%	41%
Display P3 Coverage	35.12	40.6 16%	37.39 6%	38.03 8%	49.95 42%
sRGB Coverage	52.7	61.2 16%	56.2 7%	56.5 7%	73.9 40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	36.29	41.95 16%	38.63 6%	39.29 8%	51.7 42%
Response Times		-39%	-21%	-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(23.6, 18.4)	68 ?(32, 36) -62%	58 -38%	44.4 ?(15.2, 29.2) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	22.4 ?(14.4, 8)	26 ?(20, 6) -16%	23 -3%	27.2 ?(6.8, 20.4) -21%
PWM Frequency		217 ?(90)	200 ?(90)
Screen		-40%	-32%	-7%	-86%
Brightness middle	242.7	226 -7%	253 4%	209.7 -14%	189 -22%
Brightness	232	217 -6%	246 6%	193 -17%	184 -21%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	86 -2%	75 -15%	92 5%
Black Level *	0.52	0.58 -12%	0.44 15%	0.19 63%	2.2 -323%
Contrast	467	390 -16%	575 23%	1104 136%	86 -82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.9	9.84 -101%	9.2 -88%	7.8 -59%	7.77 -59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.3	16.77 17%	17.68 13%	24.1 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	11.1 -311%	11.05 -309%	7.3 -170%	8.82 -227%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.35 ^94%	2.55 ^86%	2.39 ^92%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6876 ^95%	11979 ^54%	11451 ^57%	5771 ^113%	9275 ^70%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	33.5	39 16%	36 7%	39.3 17%	48 43%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	52.5	61 16%	56 7%	56.5 8%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-21% / -29%	-16% / -23%	-4% / -5%	-23% / -51%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
22.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 14.4 ms subida
22.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms).
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 23.6 ms subida
42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 18.4 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	119 Points +86%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points +80%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points +69%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	99 Points +55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +38%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	64 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	35 Points -45%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	27 Points -58%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points +60%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	234 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	223 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	180 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	118 Points -34%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points -48%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points +60%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	1.14 Points +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	1.08 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points +18%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	0.83 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	0.43 Points -48%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	0.35 Points -58%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	3.19 Points +39%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	2.62 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	2.49 Points +8%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2.3 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points -1%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	1.42 Points -38%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	1.17 Points -49%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	9852 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	7580 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	6994 Points +45%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	4808 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	3563 Points -26%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2911 Points -39%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	4359 Points +99%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points +89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	3725 Points +70%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	3286 Points +50%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2192 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	1164 Points -47%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	948 Points -57%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	790 s * -56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	788 s * -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	698 s * -38%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	507 s *

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4055

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

4808

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2192

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

14.45 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.3 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.83 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

19.23 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

180 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

64 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	4182 Points +79%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	3178 Points +36%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	2937 Points +26%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	2335 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	1956 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	4231 Points +30%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	3707 Points +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3246 Points
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	2880 Points -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	5275 Points +85%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	3343 Points +17%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	3234 Points +13%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	2856 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2335 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2856 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3246 puntos
ayuda

	Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Asus X555LN-XO112H Toshiba MQ01ABF050
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-12%	-13%	12908%	28%
Read Seq	106.9	96.5 -10%	92.1 -14%	522 388%	105.8 -1%
Write Seq	97.5	77.9 -20%	88.5 -9%	476.6 389%	104 7%
Read 512	32.28	20.82 -36%	32.94 2%	399.7 1138%	35.72 11%
Write 512	35.39	19.83 -44%	26.71 -25%	185.4 424%	44.85 27%
Read 4k	0.373	0.342 -8%	0.372 0%	33.12 8779%	0.47 26%
Write 4k	0.636	0.836 31%	0.283 -56%	89.8 14019%	1.044 64%
Read 4k QD32	0.694	0.595 -14%	0.921 33%	400.9 57667%	0.894 29%
Write 4k QD32	0.682	0.706 4%	0.473 -31%	140.2 20457%	1.099 61%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB

Tasa de Transferencia Mínima: 41.5 MB/s

Tasa de Transferencia Máxima: 111.6 MB/s

Tasa de Transferencia Promedio: 78.8 MB/s

Tiempo de Acceso: 18.7 ms

Velocidad de Ráfagas: 140.7 MB/s

Uso de CPU: 3.2 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7564 Points +487%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	2341 Points +82%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1834 Points +42%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1376 Points +7%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	1288 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1265 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1206 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1154 Points -10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	1090 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410	899 Points -30%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	411 Points -68%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	342 Points -73%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7270 Points +744%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	1769 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1525 Points +77%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1370 Points +59%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1220 Points +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1191 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1179 Points +37%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	867 Points +1%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	861 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410	850 Points -1%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	441 Points -49%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	361 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	38748 Points +861%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	8744 Points +117%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	6597 Points +64%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	6426 Points +59%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	6106 Points +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	5769 Points +43%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	5592 Points +39%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	4033 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	1928 Points -52%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	1708 Points -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6100 Points +698%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	1567 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1010 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	897 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	810 Points +6%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	770 Points +1%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	764 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	762 Points 0%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	281 Points -63%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	225 Points -71%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	116616 Points +209%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	85402 Points +126%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	68464 Points +81%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	59371 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	53318 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	51362 Points +36%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	51015 Points +35%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	37735 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	23395 Points -38%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	17603 Points -53%

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		1297 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		31586 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3248 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		666 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		337 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Asus X555LD-XX283H GeForce 820M, 4010U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680	55.3 fps +52%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	52.4 fps +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	41.4 fps +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	36.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	34.6 fps -5%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	28.9 fps -20%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB	24 fps -34%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 128 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 fps -45%

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	36.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	28.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17

Ruido

Ocioso		31.6 / 32 / 32.4 dB(A)
Carga		33.3 / 35.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

	Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Asus X555LN-XO112H GeForce 840M, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Noise		2%	3%	-13%	-8%	-6%
off / environment *	28.9	30.4 -5%	30.4 -5%	29.3 -1%		30.7 -6%
Idle Minimum *	31.6	31.8 -1%	30.9 2%	32.3 -2%	31.7 -0%	32 -1%
Idle Average *	32	31.8 1%	30.9 3%	32.3 -1%	31.7 1%	32 -0%
Idle Maximum *	32.4	31.8 2%	31 4%	32.4 -0%	31.8 2%	32.2 1%
Load Average *	33.3	31.9 4%	31.8 5%	44.4 -33%	40.8 -23%	37.3 -12%
Load Maximum *	35.5	31.8 10%	31.9 10%	49.2 -39%	43.2 -22%	42.6 -20%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


32.6 °C	31 °C	26.4 °C
33 °C	36.8 °C	26.4 °C
26.8 °C	26.8 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 30 °C


27.8 °C	40 °C	31.2 °C
27.8 °C	36.4 °C	45 °C
32.2 °C	27.6 °C	28.6 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 33 °C

Conector de corriente 32.4 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

Asus X555DA-BB11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Ocioso	8.3 / 8.6 / 13.1 Watt
Carga	31.2 / 43.9 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Power Consumption		29%	35%	-68%	19%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	6 28%	5.4 35%	8.29 -0%	4.2 49%
Idle Average *	8.6	8.7 -1%	6.8 21%	8.9 -3%	6.3 27%
Idle Maximum *	13.1	9.2 30%	7.3 44%	10.2 22%	7.1 46%
Load Average *	31.2	18.6 40%	21.1 32%	77.1 -147%	35.2 -13%
Load Maximum *	43.9	23.8 46%	25.5 42%	136.6 -211%	49.2 -12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		7h 15min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 56min
Carga (máximo brillo)		1h 12min

	Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh	Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, 37 Wh
Duración de Batería		102%	14%	101%
Reader / Idle	435			961 121%
WiFi v1.3	176	356 102%	201 14%	389 121%
Load	72			115 60%
WiFi					256

Pro

+ Tonos grises precisos sin calibrar la pantalla

+ Diseño atractivo

+ Bajas temperaturas

+ La CPU no se ralentiza

+ HDMI y VGA

+ Barato

Contra

- Pantalla con colores poco precisos

- Teclado poco rígido

- Escaso rendimiento de CPU y GPU

- Regular iluminación de la pantalla

- El ventilador se mantiene activo todo el rato

- Mala duración de batería

- No tiene USB Type-C

Se nos hace difícil recomendar la compra del X555DA especialmente cuando las variantes X555LN o X555LD pueden rendir más y durante más tiempo que el equivalente AMD. Normalmente si el hardware es más lento y barato, los usuarios esperan mayor duración de batería y temperaturas inferiores para compensar. El X555DA es lo peor de ambos mundos, ya que el rendimiento y la duración de batería está por debajo de la media.

Aparte de la lenta APU AMD, el hardware sufre otra serie de problemas. La tapa y la base del teclado se doblan con demasiada facilidad para nuestro gusto y la pantalla 1080p TN reproduce muy mal los colores. Los usuarios interesados deberían echar un ojo a las variantes de este portátil con ULV Broadwell e incluso Haswell.

Este portátil falla como PC barato debido a su escasa duración de batería, mediocre pantalla y escaso rendimiento. Las alternativas con Intel de hace tres o cuatro años ofrecen mejores resultados en casi todos los aspectos.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Asus X555DA-BB11 - 04/13/2017 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabado

72 / 98 → 74%

Teclado

70%

Ratón

81%

Conectividad

61 / 81 → 75%

Peso

62 / 20-67 → 90%