Breve análisis del Asus Zenbook UX330UA
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (jseb) | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 1636:1 (Negro: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9350 SHP1420, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Samsung 133YL04-P02, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -29% | 5% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.2 | 44.53 -31% | 66.4 3% | 59.1 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.6 | 66.8 -26% | 97.5 8% | 85.5 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 45.97 -30% | 68.4 5% | 61 -7% |
| Response Times | -16% | 196% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 52.4 ? -64% | 38 ? -19% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 23.6 ? 6% | 27 ? -8% | |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 220 ? 10% | 1429 ? 615% | |
| Screen | -6% | -11% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 360 | 277.5 -23% | 344 -4% | 390 8% |
| Brightness | 337 | 276 -18% | 326 -3% | 352 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 88 2% | 87 1% | 81 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.191 13% | 0.36 -64% | 0.69 -214% |
| Contrast | 1636 | 1453 -11% | 956 -42% | 565 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 4.88 6% | 6.09 -17% | 3.04 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.85 | 10 -13% | 7.01 21% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.23 | 4.26 32% | 5.36 14% | 2.88 54% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.59 85% | 2.01 109% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6506 100% | 6562 99% | 7230 90% | 6848 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 41.6 -29% | 62.25 6% | 55 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 65.79 -27% | 97.54 8% | 85 -6% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -18% /
-12% | -7% /
-9% | 57% /
25% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 39 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 200 Hz | ≤ 80 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 80 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3527 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4355 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 13-9350 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 63% | 106% | 40% | |
| Read Seq | 447.6 | 1097 145% | 1193 167% | 475.2 6% |
| Write Seq | 309.4 | 307.7 -1% | 309.6 0% | 423.7 37% |
| Read 512 | 265.9 | 684 157% | 613 131% | 404.8 52% |
| Write 512 | 275.2 | 308.6 12% | 311 13% | 396.2 44% |
| Read 4k | 18.89 | 38.52 104% | 42.43 125% | 28.57 51% |
| Write 4k | 75.1 | 113 50% | 144.9 93% | 90.7 21% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 142.2 | 244.7 72% | 549 286% | 288.9 103% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 228.9 | 151.5 -34% | 311.3 36% | 242.3 6% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1626 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60466 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6081 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 57.9 | 31.1 | 26.2 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.3 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 48.3 | 25.8 | 22.4 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 13.9 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 37.4 / 41.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.3 °C / 75.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4 °C / 7.2 F).
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (47.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 6.3 / 7.5 Watt |
| Carga |
36 / 31.5 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -1% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 3.3 -10% | 4.2 -40% | 6.4 -113% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 7.4 -17% | 8.4 -33% | 6.6 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 8.2 -9% | 8.9 -19% | 6.8 9% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 36.5 -1% | 15.9 56% | 27.5 24% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.5 | 43.7 -39% | 22.5 29% | 32.4 -3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9350 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -11% | -30% | 2% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1225 | 782 -36% | 810 -34% | 1013 -17% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 612 | 451 -26% | 418 -32% | 402 -34% |
| Load | 115 | 150 30% | 89 -23% | 182 58% |
| H.264 | 486 | 418 |
Pro
Contra
Aunque el nuevo Asus Zenbook UX360UA-FC059T, a unos 1100 Euros a fecha de test, no alcanza el 90%, vuelve a ser un portátil que el redactor querría poseer.
La soberbia carcasa llama la atención, y el bajo peso y el aguante extremo de batería implican una movilidad sobresaliente. La pantalla también convence por completo.
Continúa con el buenísimo rendimiento Wi-Fi, los puertos posicionados de forma ideal, y el funcionamiento fresco y quedo. También tiene una potencia impecable y funciona como debería.
Por supuesto, hay unos cuantos puntos menores de críticas: El teclado podría ser de más calidad, y no pudomos acostumbrarnos del todo a las propiedades de deslizado o las teclas del touchpad. El débil lector de tarjetas de memoria es innecesario; el fabricante sólo tendría que haber gastado un poco para tener una solución adecuada.
Le damos al nuevo Zenbook una recomendación de compra sin ambajes. Los compradores que encuentren excitante la carcasa y puedan tolerar el menor rendimiento y un aguante de batería algo (!) más corto deberían echarle un vistazo al Zenbook UX305CA con panel 4K. Sin embargo, los rivales algo más voluminosos, pesados, y no con tanto aguante de Dell y Lenovo lograron buenísimas valoraciones de 90 y 86%, y ambos tienen sus puntos fuertes. Por ello, podemos decir que hemos creado un campo de pruebas completamente convincente.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
- 11/04/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
