Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del Convertible Acer Spin 1 (N3450, FHD)
Connections
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 251 cd/m²
Contraste: 1195:1 (Negro: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6" | Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Dell Latitude 3189 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Medion Akoya E2215T IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6" | HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | -9% | -2% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 49.67 | 44.23 -11% | 44.96 -9% | 48.12 -3% | 45.21 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 72.6 | 66.3 -9% | 67.3 -7% | 71.7 -1% | 67.8 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 51.4 | 45.73 -11% | 46.49 -10% | 49.78 -3% | 46.73 -9% |
| Response Times | -6% | -19% | 3% | 26% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 39 ? -8% | 40 ? -11% | 31 ? 14% | 18.8 ? 48% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 25 ? -4% | 30.4 ? -27% | 26 ? -8% | 23.2 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | ||||
| Screen | 10% | 18% | -2% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 251 | 253 1% | 291 16% | 338 35% | 194 -23% |
| Brightness | 247 | 245 -1% | 284 15% | 309 25% | 186 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 65 -24% | 92 7% | 76 -12% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.17 19% | 0.16 24% | 0.39 -86% | 0.22 -5% |
| Contrast | 1195 | 1488 25% | 1819 52% | 867 -27% | 882 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 3.17 26% | 3.4 20% | 3.94 8% | 3.06 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 8.13 26% | 9.6 13% | 9.96 9% | 8.81 20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.77 | 2 47% | 1.8 52% | 2.54 33% | 1.42 62% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.43 91% | 2.14 103% | 2.38 92% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 6524 100% | 6850 95% | 6544 99% | 6902 94% | 6432 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 42 -11% | 42.8 -9% | 46 -2% | 42.98 -9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 72 | 66 -8% | 67 -7% | 71 -1% | 67.56 -6% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -2% /
4% | -3% /
8% | -0% /
-1% | 7% /
3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1530 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 1181 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Dell Latitude 3189 Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -28% | 3912% | 729% | -7% | |
| Read Seq | 109.1 | 53.9 -51% | 408.4 274% | 169.6 55% | 106 -3% |
| Write Seq | 107.3 | 66.4 -38% | 214.3 100% | 39.77 -63% | 106.1 -1% |
| Read 512 | 35.89 | 22.62 -37% | 243.7 579% | 155.3 333% | 33.53 -7% |
| Write 512 | 45.28 | 67.3 49% | 170.6 277% | 27.45 -39% | 39.03 -14% |
| Read 4k | 0.482 | 0.378 -22% | 8.864 1739% | 13.09 2616% | 0.407 -16% |
| Write 4k | 1.037 | 0.263 -75% | 49.14 4639% | 7.915 663% | 1.026 -1% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.003 | 0.998 0% | 132.2 13080% | 15.11 1406% | 0.898 -10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.043 | 0.518 -50% | 111.7 10609% | 10.05 864% | 1.003 -4% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 414 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dirt 3 (2011) | 40.1 | 14.7 | ||
| Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 22.9 | 11.1 | ||
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 11.2 | 7.6 | ||
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 27.8 | 12.2 | ||
| Dead Space 3 (2013) | 19.3 | 9.1 | ||
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 21.5 | 9.3 | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 16.2 | 8.8 | 7.9 | |
| GRID 2 (2013) | 29.3 | 14.4 | ||
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 43.8 | 19.1 | ||
| Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014) | 10 | 6.3 | ||
| Sims 4 (2014) | 71.6 | 13.7 | ||
| F1 2014 (2014) | 22 | 16 | ||
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 28.5 | 12.5 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 16.4 | 9.7 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 18.1 | 6.2 | ||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 10 | 5.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.1 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.2 °C / 2.2 F).
Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.6 / 6.6 / 7.1 Watt |
| Carga |
13.8 / 13.1 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
Pro
Contra
El procesador quad-core Apollo Lake integrado en el Spin 1 ofrece suficiente potencia de cáculo para las aplicaciones ofimáticas y de internet. El decodificador integrado en la GPU permite reproducir los formatos de video habituales.
No le falta almacenamiento, ya que Acer incluye un HDD de 500 GB. Para cambiar el HDD por un SSD hay que abrir la carcasa. No hay escotilla de mantenimiento.
El Spin 1 resulta ser una máquina de escribir y navegar incansable.
The small computer can shine in terms of the battery life. In our practically relevant WLAN test, the convertible achieves a runtime of almost 9.5 hours. The built-in keyboard left a very decent impression and is also suitable for more frequent writing tasks. The Full HD IPS display pleases with stable viewing angles, a good contrast, and a very decent color reproduction. The brightness, however, could have been higher.
El pequeño ordenador destaca con su aguante de batería. En nuestro test WLAN realista, el convertible logra un aguante de casi 9.5 horas. El teclado integrado causa una impresión decente y también es adecuado para las tareas de escritura más frecuente. El display Full HD IPS agrada con sus ángulos de visión estables, su buen contraste y su decentísima reproducción de color. El brillo, sin embargo, podría haber sido más alto.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E
- 07/05/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
