Breve análisis del Convertible Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Hinum) | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 72 %
Brillo con batería: 332 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Negro: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.33
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D AUO B140HAN03.2 / AUO323D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, , 2560x1440, 14" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | 4% | 7% | 4% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 64.8 5% | 65.4 6% | 65.5 7% | 64.5 5% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.1 | 93.1 4% | 90.4 1% | 96.1 8% | 92 3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.9 | 66 5% | 65.8 5% | 66.9 6% | 65.5 4% | |
| Response Times | 35% | 14% | 97% | 15% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 29 ? 43% | 33.2 ? 35% | 1 ? 98% | 20 ? 61% | 33 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 19 ? 27% | 28 ? -8% | 1 ? 96% | 34 ? -31% | 23 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 240 ? | 1000 ? | 125 ? | ||
| Screen | 18% | 10% | 32% | 11% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 344 0% | 334.6 -3% | 279 -19% | 345 0% | 327 -5% |
| Brightness | 292 | 326 12% | 319 9% | 277 -5% | 328 12% | 324 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 72 | 86 19% | 90 25% | 91 26% | 91 26% | 88 22% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.27 -4% | 0.336 -29% | 0.38 -46% | 0.35 -35% | |
| Contrast | 1323 | 1274 -4% | 996 -25% | 908 -31% | 934 -29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.65 | 5.53 56% | 6.21 51% | 5.15 59% | 8.4 34% | 6.54 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.8 | 10.01 44% | 12 33% | 8.28 53% | 11.9 33% | 15.59 12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.95 | 6.67 48% | 7.71 40% | 5.44 58% | 4.3 67% | 9.52 26% |
| Gamma | 1.33 165% | 2.43 91% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6441 101% | 7012 93% | 6458 101% | 5686 114% | 7368 88% | 8802 74% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 60 3% | 58.6 1% | 98 69% | 62 7% | 59 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 93 4% | 90 1% | 100 12% | 92 3% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 19% /
17% | 9% /
9% | 65% /
45% | 11% /
11% | 11% /
8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida | |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 51 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida | |
| ↘ 38 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 86 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2979 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4076 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -5% | 73% | -17% | 84% | 59% | |
| Read Seq | 472.6 | 452.1 -4% | 1376 191% | 518 10% | 1510 220% | 1168 147% |
| Write Seq | 407.7 | 421.3 3% | 571 40% | 199.9 -51% | 1193 193% | 329 -19% |
| Read 512 | 309.5 | 288.6 -7% | 679 119% | 374.9 21% | 1015 228% | |
| Write 512 | 368.5 | 310.7 -16% | 571 55% | 201 -45% | 307 -17% | |
| Read 4k | 37.57 | 28.52 -24% | 42.66 14% | 29.3 -22% | 37 -2% | 33 -12% |
| Write 4k | 75.5 | 72.1 -5% | 137.9 83% | 76.8 2% | 126 67% | 132 75% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 324.8 | 389.6 20% | 535 65% | 272 -16% | 404 24% | 525 62% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 307.4 | 285.3 -7% | 361.2 18% | 197.1 -36% | 319 4% | 325 6% |
| 3DMark 06 1280x768 Score | 6524 puntos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 4123 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1141 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37865 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4050 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 21.9 | 14 | 7.6 | |
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 21 | 12.7 | ||
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 51.8 | 23.6 | 16 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 32 | 19.3 | 16.1 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 22.3 | 16 | 11 | |
| Thief (2014) | 13.9 | 9.2 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 23.5 | 13.7 | 6.8 | |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 26.3 | 19 | 9.7 | |
| Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 17.6 | 12.2 | ||
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 19.7 | 15.5 | ||
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 71.6 | 16.26 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 23.4 | 20.8 | 7.6 | |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 8 severe graphical problems (no menue) | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 10.1 | |||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 19.8 | 11.5 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 11 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 12.9 | 10.1 | ||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 9.1 | |||
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 36 small graphical problems (slow down in game) | 29 small graphical problems (slow down in game) | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 13 | 9.1 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.48 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.3 / 7.4 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
22.1 / 21.7 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -24% | -49% | -36% | -33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 6.9 -60% | 5.5 -28% | 4.7 -9% | 7.3 -70% | 4.2 2% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.9 -7% | 6.7 9% | 8.6 -16% | 10 -35% | 11.5 -55% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 8.3 -4% | 7.1 11% | 12.2 -53% | 10.15 -27% | 11.7 -46% |
| Load Average * | 22.1 | 30.1 -36% | 33.1 -50% | 29.7 -34% | 25.2 -14% | 31 -40% |
| Load Maximum * | 21.7 | 29.6 -36% | 35.2 -62% | 50.5 -133% | 29.3 -35% | 27.4 -26% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 42 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 36% | 27% | -9% | -21% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 748 | 1165 56% | 1233 65% | 824 10% | 640 -14% | 696 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 391 | 581 49% | 558 43% | 315 -19% | 321 -18% | 322 -18% |
| Load | 163 | 169 4% | 121 -26% | 132 -19% | 112 -31% | 111 -32% |
| H.264 | 520 | 468 |
Pro
Contra
Es un concepto ambicioso, pero el diablo está en los detalles. El Acer Spin 7 (sin "Aspire") es una serie nueva de convertibles ultra delgados de 360º. Analizamos el modelo de 14" SP714-51-M09D, que tuvo un inicio un poco movidito con la CPU Kaby Lake Y (TDP 4.5W) en términos de rendimiento CPU y de aplicación: el predecesor Skylake es a veces más rápido. Nos gustó el chasis compacto y ligero, pero el delgado panel inferior y la falta de estabilidad del chasis afectan a la buena impresión visual.
El delgado chasis tiene buena pinta, pero echamos a faltar más estabilidad. El display es realmente bueno, pero sufre de fuertes desviaciones de color de fábrica, si bien un calibrado puede ayudar.
El buen y enorme clickpad con la respuesta clara queda frustrado por un teclado de escaso desplazamiento y respuesta limitada. El display básicamente resplandece, pero también convence con altos cntrastes. Los colores por desgracia no son muy precisos de fábrica. Un calibrado puede cambiar eso, pero ¿qué cliente tiene un espectofotómetro en casa? Puedes mejorar la situación con el perfil enlazado en la caja, aunque los resultados no serán tan buenos como un calibrado manual.
El fácil mantenimiento a través del gran panel inferior es ejemplar. Sólo está la mala webcam y el débil sonido del altavoz.
Kaby Lake ULV no puede convencernos del todo; el SoC suele quedar al fondo del ranking, incluso comparado con el anterior Core m5.
El sistema de 14" SP714-51-M09D actualmente cuesta unos 1200 Euros. El rival de Acer, Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T con SSD 512 GB y Core i7-6500U más potente, cuesta 1130 Euros, y también logra un mayor aguante y colores más precisos de fábrica (perfil de fábrica de Asus). Si Asus arregla la bisagra endeble, el Asus UX360UA claramente sería la mejor recomendación.
¿Es pues el HP Spectre x360 13 una mejor alternativa? La versión Kaby Lake no se encuentra disponible aún, pero el predecesor ya arranca en 1000 Euros. Este modelo viene equipado con la 6200U más rápida, 256 GB de SSD y un mejor teclado. El aguante de batería también es muy superior al del Spin 7. Excepto por el mantenimiento y el concepto sin ventilador, no hay muchos argumentos a favor del Acer Spin 7. Ahora mismo es demasiado caro; debería costar unos 1000 Euros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
- 10/24/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Price comparison
