Breve análisis del Convertible Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 759:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.74 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.78% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE Samsung L_LLTN133YL03L01, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 51% | 50% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.78 | 65.4 57% | 64.6 55% | 40.31 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.9 | 90.4 44% | 89.5 42% | 60.5 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.17 | 65.8 52% | 65.5 52% | 41.65 -4% |
| Response Times | 33% | 113% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53 ? | 33.2 ? 37% | 36 ? 32% | 38 ? 28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39 ? | 28 ? 28% | 28 ? 28% | 29 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | 350 ? | 1330 ? 280% | ||
| Screen | 8% | 16% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 243 | 334.6 38% | 314 29% | 253 4% |
| Brightness | 248 | 319 29% | 294 19% | 232 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 83 -9% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.336 -5% | 0.57 -78% | 0.28 12% |
| Contrast | 759 | 996 31% | 551 -27% | 904 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.44 | 6.21 -14% | 2.18 60% | 6.36 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.73 | 12 -23% | 6.48 33% | 12.72 -31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.74 | 7.71 -63% | 2.45 48% | 10.26 -116% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.36 93% | 2.39 92% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7799 83% | 6458 101% | 6745 96% | 6500 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.6 | 58.6 48% | 58 46% | 38 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.5 | 90 44% | 89 42% | 60 -4% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 31% /
20% | 60% /
41% | 3% /
-7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 27 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 96 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 53 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 33 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 89 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 350 Hz | ≤ 60 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 350 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 60 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 350 Hz es relativamente alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Sin embargo, hay informes de que algunas personas pueden seguir viendo parpadeos a 500 Hz y superior, por lo que cuidado. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3550 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4529 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Liteonit LCH-256V2S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 63% | -9% | -15% | |
| Read Seq | 518 | 1376 166% | 521 1% | 486.3 -6% |
| Write Seq | 476.5 | 571 20% | 238.6 -50% | 283.7 -40% |
| Read 512 | 408 | 679 66% | 417.3 2% | 337.5 -17% |
| Write 512 | 274.5 | 571 108% | 237.7 -13% | 283.5 3% |
| Read 4k | 35.66 | 42.66 20% | 35.9 1% | 26.75 -25% |
| Write 4k | 106.7 | 137.9 29% | 99.9 -6% | 85.3 -20% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 368.7 | 535 45% | 366.6 -1% | 309.7 -16% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 246.3 | 361.2 47% | 236.7 -4% | 250.8 2% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6246 puntos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 4697 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1772 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 39823 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4744 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 899 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diablo III (2012) | 66.1 | 42.3 | 34.2 | 21.4 |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 43.9 | 25.9 | 10 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.3 | 26.5 | 22.5 | 8.2 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 29.1 | 21.2 | 12.4 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 42.9 | 29.9 | 19.1 | |
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 117.3 | 32.5 | 15.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 18 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 74 | 50.6 | 20.6 | 19.1 |
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 27.7 | 14.1 | ||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 19.4 | 12.8 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 36.3 | 22.2 | 10.1 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 47 | 29.3 | 14.2 | |
| Just Cause 3 (2015) | 25.1 | 19.5 | ||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 19 | 9 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 0 game wont start | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 41.3 | 31.3 | 14.5 | |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 27 | 16.3 | ||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 13.5 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 66.1 | 43 | 17.3 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 37.3 / 43.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.37 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.1 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
33.4 / 55.9 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE 5Y70, HD Graphics 5300, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -3% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 5.5 -41% | 4.8 -23% | 4 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 7.1 | 6.7 6% | 10.7 -51% | 4.8 32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7.1 8% | 11.8 -53% | 7.6 1% |
| Load Average * | 33.4 | 33.1 1% | 18.3 45% | 30 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.9 | 35.2 37% | 19.7 65% | 29.3 48% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE 5Y70, HD Graphics 5300, 44 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 47% | -29% | 21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 722 | 1233 71% | 886 23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 373 | 558 50% | 263 -29% | 486 30% |
| Load | 100 | 121 21% | 109 9% |
Pro
Contra
Antes de enumerar los múltiples defectos listados en la lista contra, tengamos en cuenta el precio: 800 Euros. Por este precio creemos que el display del Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB es sub-par, pero aparte de "sangrado de pantalla", es aceptable. Sin embargo, no hay justificación posible para el mal rendimiento WLAN. Lo que es más, el hecho de que casi ningún convertible ofrezca una escotilla de mantenimiento no salva a Lenovo de instalar una en este momento, ya que mejoraría la comodidad de la mejora y mantenimiento bastante. Por supuesto, los fabricantes afirman que los requerimientos para un fácil mantenimiento les impedirían construir una carcasa delgada y ligera, pero, ya que esto ahorra al usuario los altos precios de reparación y mejora, sería razonable encontrar un modo de poner esa escotilla de mantenimiento.
En el lado positivo, tenemos la gran manufactura y la estilosa carcasa (subjetivo). Los mecanismos de seguridad también son una sorpresa ya que pocos dispositivos de esta categoría de precios los ofrecen.
El convertible Yoga debería ser mucho más barato, ya que Lenovo no tenía por qué poner una gráfica dedicada. Esta razón, combinada con el breve aguante de batería, nos deja con sentimientos encontrados. No podemos recomendar este convertible sinceramente a nuestros lectores.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
- 11/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
