Breve análisis del Convertible Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE (jseb) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE (jseb) |
|
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 314 cd/m²
Contraste: 1032:1 (Negro: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.43
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller, , 1920x1080, 10.1" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 11 5175 YJ0MP-TV108FM, , 1920x1080, 10.8" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | |||||
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 63.4 | 53.8 | 65.8 | |
sRGB Coverage | 96.6 | 81.1 | 73.7 | 96.2 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69 | 59.3 | 53.8 | 66.8 | |
Response Times | -22% | -12% | 12% | 34% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 46 ? -28% | 46 ? -28% | 33.2 ? 8% | 25 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 31 ? -15% | 26 ? 4% | 22.8 ? 16% | 17 ? 37% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 200 | |||
Screen | 12% | -1% | -27% | -53% | |
Brightness middle | 382 | 389.2 2% | 462 21% | 322 -16% | 451 18% |
Brightness | 363 | 392 8% | 449 24% | 319 -12% | 425 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 92 11% | 86 4% | 97 17% | 80 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.27 27% | 0.45 -22% | 0.42 -14% | 0.37 -0% |
Contrast | 1032 | 1441 40% | 1027 0% | 767 -26% | 1219 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.61 | 3.61 -0% | 4.4 -22% | 6.02 -67% | 11.04 -206% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.92 | 9.21 -16% | 10.06 -27% | 14.92 -88% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.77 | 3.8 -1% | 3.49 7% | 6.29 -67% | 10.45 -177% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.55 86% | 2.4 92% | 2 110% |
CCT | 6760 96% | 5969 109% | 6256 104% | 7712 84% | 8849 73% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 53.21 | 47.8 | 74 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 80.76 | 73.2 | 100 | |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -5% /
5% | -7% /
-3% | -8% /
-19% | -10% /
-35% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida | |
↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1296 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1247 puntos | |
ayuda |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 64 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Dell Latitude 11 5175 Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 466% | 620% | 715% | 667% | |
Read Seq | 120.5 | 663 450% | 472.6 292% | 501 316% | 512 325% |
Write Seq | 34.39 | 158.2 360% | 296.8 763% | 297.2 764% | 462.1 1244% |
Read 512 | 102.6 | 313.1 205% | 383.8 274% | 351.7 243% | 376 266% |
Write 512 | 26.58 | 158.2 495% | 296.8 1017% | 295.7 1012% | 295.2 1011% |
Read 4k | 13.34 | 30.14 126% | 30.89 132% | 28.31 112% | 31.83 139% |
Write 4k | 11.56 | 68 488% | 71.4 518% | 90.3 681% | 64.5 458% |
Read 4k QD32 | 33.6 | 243.7 625% | 243.9 626% | 285 748% | 269.6 702% |
Write 4k QD32 | 13.79 | 149.2 982% | 198.6 1340% | 268.4 1846% | 178.2 1192% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Dell Latitude 11 5175 | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Dell Latitude 11 5175 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Dell Latitude 11 5175 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 478 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2087 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 19.8 | 9.5 | ||
Tomb Raider (2013) | 24.8 | 10 () | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 19.5 | 7.8 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 5.3 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 3.8 / 2.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 2 / 4.6 / 5.7 Watt |
Carga |
11.5 / 11.5 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS , 1920x1080, 10.1" | Dell Latitude 11 5175 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.8" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -30% | -92% | -128% | -89% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2 | 2.7 -35% | 3.7 -85% | 7.4 -270% | 4.4 -120% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 5.8 -26% | 6.8 -48% | 11.6 -152% | 9 -96% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 6.6 -16% | 7.6 -33% | 11.6 -104% | 10.7 -88% |
Load Average * | 11.5 | 15.2 -32% | 22.5 -96% | 16.8 -46% | 19.6 -70% |
Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 16.1 -40% | 34.5 -200% | 19.1 -66% | 19.9 -73% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Dell Latitude 11 5175 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 35 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -17% | -23% | -24% | -53% | |
Reader / Idle | 1153 | 791 -31% | 793 -31% | 732 -37% | 478 -59% |
WiFi v1.3 | 498 | 488 -2% | 426 -14% | 443 -11% | 263 -47% |
Load | 138 | 172 | 130 | 106 | |
H.264 | 411 | 432 |
Pro
Contra
Abrir, tomar notas, y pensar creativamente: El Yoga Book, de hecho, parece un golazo ya que tantas opciones de entrada en un dispositivo y las entradas de boli por papel no se habían inventado aún.
¿Puedo tirar ya mi portátil visto que puedo usar mi Outlook, etc. en el al ser un 2-en-1 Windows? No, porque el Yoga Book está pensado principalmente como interfaz de entrada. En clases, praćticas técnicas, en reuniones regulares, o firmando en stands de convenciones: Abre el Yoga Book, toma notas o haz un boceto de algo creativamente sobre "papel" y guárdalo en OneDrive. Tareas de edición mayores con herramientas DTP potentes tales como Adobe inDesign o Photoshop se realizan en un PC/portátil de alto rendimiento.
Por un lado, el Yoga Book es atractivo gracias a la entrada de escritura natural por papel. Por otro, es un dispositivo Windows completo. Los usuarios pueden enviar sus trabajos creativos o sus notas a sus apps de sobremesa habituales o editarlas hasta cierto punto.
Una disertación se seguirá escribiendo en un buen portátil o teclado de sobremesa. Sin embargo, el Yoga Book puede simplificar la manera. El usuario ya no está atado por las restricciones de herramientas o dispositivos de entrada específicos.
Los compradores no tienen opciones por ahora. Ningún 2-en-1 del mercado ofrece esta combinación de movilidad extremadamente alta (aguante, peso, chasis), dispositivos de entrada preferidos (toque y AnyPen en la pantalla, toque o boli papel en el pad creativo, teclado/touchpad) y apps Windows (herramientas ofimáticas conocidas).
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE
- 10/25/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch