Breve análisis del Convertible Samsung Galaxy Book 12 LTE
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 376 cd/m²
Contraste: 12533:1 (Negro: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -13% | -19% | -13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 77.3 | 67.6 -13% | 62.8 -19% | 58.8 -24% | 65.2 -16% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.8 | 99 7% | 94 1% | 87.5 -6% | 91 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.1 | 69.1 -17% | 64.7 -22% | 60.6 -27% | 66.1 -20% |
| Response Times | 2435% | -343% | -428% | -523% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4 ? | 42 ? -950% | 42.4 ? -960% | 37 ? -825% | 45 ? -1025% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 29 ? -45% | 30.8 ? -54% | 26 ? -30% | 24 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21000 8300% | 210.1 ? -16% | ||
| Screen | -90% | -141% | -176% | -117% | |
| Brightness middle | 376 | 417 11% | 523.2 39% | 369 -2% | 406 8% |
| Brightness | 378 | 401 6% | 522 38% | 331 -12% | 396 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 75 -18% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.29 -867% | 0.42 -1300% | 0.46 -1433% | 0.3 -900% |
| Contrast | 12533 | 1438 -89% | 1246 -90% | 802 -94% | 1353 -89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 3.63 11% | 4 2% | 5.52 -35% | 5.28 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.45 | 6.74 -4% | 8.6 -33% | 9.29 -44% | 9.83 -52% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.64 | 2.18 40% | 5.5 -51% | 6.95 -91% | 6.71 -84% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 3.09 71% | 2.16 102% | 2.58 85% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7113 91% | 6767 96% | 7546 86% | 7009 93% | 6532 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 74 | 63 -15% | 64.86 -12% | 56 -24% | 59 -20% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 99 6% | 93.97 1% | 88 -5% | 91 -2% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 779% /
399% | -166% /
-155% | -208% /
-178% | -218% /
-150% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 39 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 11 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 250 Hz | ≤ 100 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 250 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 100 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 250 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3538 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4291 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 47% | 46% | 162% | |
| Read Seq | 511 | 723 41% | 1294 153% | 1066 109% | 2408 371% |
| Write Seq | 473.7 | 853 80% | 865 83% | 593 25% | 1702 259% |
| Read 512 | 443.7 | 225 -49% | 406 -8% | 653 47% | 1301 193% |
| Write 512 | 395.4 | 445 13% | 589 49% | 535 35% | 1288 226% |
| Read 4k | 40.46 | 46 14% | 31.75 -22% | 35.92 -11% | 53.6 32% |
| Write 4k | 91.9 | 125 36% | 72.2 -21% | 128.3 40% | 162.2 76% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 289.1 | 423 46% | 493.3 71% | 460.6 59% | 504 74% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 260.7 | 373 43% | 434.5 67% | 425.4 63% | 420.8 61% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1683 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6149 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 888 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.9 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.8 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 58.5 | 24.1 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| / 30.3 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.5 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.3 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.6 / 2.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 9 / 11.9 Watt |
| Carga |
27.3 / 27.9 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 8% | 8% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.6 8% | 2.85 27% | 3.86 1% | 3.5 10% |
| Idle Average * | 9 | 8.1 10% | 6.76 25% | 6.4 29% | 7.2 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 8.7 27% | 6.91 42% | 7.17 40% | 7.9 34% |
| Load Average * | 27.3 | 25.5 7% | 32.88 -20% | 30.5 -12% | 29.6 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 27.9 | 23.5 16% | 37.41 -34% | 32.4 -16% | 30.8 -10% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 2% | 4% | -31% | -31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1031 | 1054 2% | 1075 4% | 711 -31% | 713 -31% |
| H.264 | 409 | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 744 | 486 | 355 | 345 | |
| Load | 168 | 105 | 95 | 111 |
Pro
Contra
Los posibles compradores con bastante dinero suelto dificilmente podrán equivocarse con el Samsung Galaxy Book 12 LTE si les gusta la idea de conectar un teclado y de alta portabilidad. Aparte de la magra selección de puertos, Samsung ha logrado combinar lo mejor de dos mundos en un dispositivo.
S-Pen y cubierta teclado vienen incluidas en la caja y rinden tan bien como el tablet bien diseñado y perfectamente fabricado.
Aunque el display Super-AMOLED no es perfecto, puede verse como un gancho comercial único del nuevo convertible Samsung con su valor de negro genial y su elevado contraste. Nuestro modelo de pruebas era un dispositivo LTE y cumplió con todos los requisitos de portabilidad, incluyendo GPS/GLONASS, TPM, BitLocker en Windows 10 Pro y un aguante de batería genial. Los usuarios ofimáticos estarán encantados con la flexibilidad de posición y buenos dispositivos de entrada mientras que la calidad de las cámaras implica que son algo más que un extra atractivo.
El hecho de que Samsung haya elegido un sistema de ventilación quedo y temperaturas de carcasa aceptables frente al rendimiento completo bajo carga contínua no debería notarse siempre que el dispositivo se use para lo que se pensó - como un dispositivo de oficina. Por ello, recomendaríamos definitivamente la compra de este dispositivo.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
- 10/24/2019 v7 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
