Breve análisis del Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (i5-8250U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 246 cd/m²
Contraste: 912:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 BOE071A / NV13FHM / Dell G64PY, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, , 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -34% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 64.6 -3% | 40.55 -39% | 67.8 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.2 | 88.8 3% | 61 -29% | 94.3 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63 | 64.8 3% | 41.89 -34% | 69.5 10% |
| Response Times | 0% | 3363% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 46 ? -0% | 38 ? 17% | 50.8 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33 ? | 33 ? -0% | 26.8 ? 19% | 37.2 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 201 ? | 20410 ? 10054% | ||
| Screen | 8% | -17% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 301 | 404 34% | 283.9 -6% | 384.2 28% |
| Brightness | 291 | 382 31% | 261 -10% | 378 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 85 -2% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.35 -6% | 0.25 24% | 0.36 -9% |
| Contrast | 912 | 1154 27% | 1136 25% | 1067 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.39 | 5.37 -0% | 6.4 -19% | 1.8 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.56 | 9.46 -11% | 18.7 -118% | 4.2 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.93 | 6.44 -9% | 6.3 -6% | 1.2 80% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.52 87% | 2.39 92% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6358 102% | 6738 96% | 6511 100% | 6708 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 58 4% | 38 -32% | 63.7 14% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 89 3% | 60 -30% | 94.2 10% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 3% /
5% | 1104% /
613% | 8% /
19% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 16 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 88 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 25 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 77 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 201 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 201 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 201 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3902 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4786 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 153% | -40% | |
| Read Seq | 476.8 | 1090 129% | 425.6 -11% |
| Write Seq | 458.3 | 1088 137% | 128.2 -72% |
| Read 512 | 351 | 753 115% | 278.5 -21% |
| Write 512 | 298.2 | 911 205% | 126.7 -58% |
| Read 4k | 20.79 | 57.5 177% | 22.15 7% |
| Write 4k | 65.8 | 140.2 113% | 40.45 -39% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 172.8 | 497.1 188% | 77.8 -55% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 160.3 | 416 160% | 41.18 -74% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1935 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8527 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1059 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.1 | |||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 16.8 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 95.9 | 63.3 | 25.4 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 33.6 / 36.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
Dell Inspiron 13 7370 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Tecra X40-D audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 6.8 / 8.9 Watt |
| Carga |
36 / 36.5 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 5% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 3.6 -0% | 5.2 -44% | 3.2 11% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 6.4 6% | 6.9 -1% | 6.5 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.2 -3% | 7 21% | 6.8 24% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 34 6% | 24.6 32% | 28.2 22% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.5 | 34.4 6% | 30.1 18% | 36 1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 2% | 26% | 69% | |
| Reader / Idle | 772 | 718 -7% | 876 13% | 1351 75% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 345 | 394 14% | 357 3% | 602 74% |
| Load | 78 | 77 -1% | 126 62% | 124 59% |
| H.264 | 367 |
Pro
Contra
Ignorando el aguante de batería algo corto, los reflejos de la pantalla, y la baja frecuencia PWM de 200 Hz, el Dell Inspiron 13 7370 de construcción inmaculada y con clase no tiene grandes debilidades.
Los cuatro núcleos con Hyperthreading definitivamente pueden berse como una mejora respecto a los modelos anteriores, ya que no hay problemas térmicos y no hay un consumo de energía importante en nuestro dispositivo de pruebas. Sin embargo, también pensamos que la mayoría de usuarios ofimáticos no encontrarán ningún uso notable para los ocho hilos y básicamente trabajarán igual de bien con los tradicionales procesadores dual-core ULV con Hyperthreading. Naturalmente, no será el caso si se usa software bien optimizado para ejecutarse en paralelo.
Por qué Dell eligió un acabado lustroso para su display definitivamente sigue siendo un secreto, aunque no encontramos problemas importantes con los reflejos de la pantalla. Podría ser algo más brillante y mostrar un mejor abanico de colores, el lector SD tortura a los fotógrafos con su proceso de copia innecesariamente largo, y tampoco queda bien en lo tocante a facilidad de reparación.
En el lado positivo, está la carcasa sólida bien fabricada, el diseño ligero y compacto, el funcionamiento normalmente fresco y quedo así como unos dispositivos de entrada geniales. El Inspiron 7370 no alcanza una puntuación total de "muy bueno" por los pelos, aunque nada impide una recomendación de compra. El dispositivo compacto más comparable es el HP Spectre 13, que es algo más plano, tiene una pantalla más brillante, un SSD-NVMe más rápido, y ofrece puertos USB Type C de segunda generación con Thunderbolt. Sin embargo, también tiene un ventilador ruidoso y molesto, no tiene lector SD alguno, y no puede beneficiarse del modo turbo.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell Inspiron 13 7370
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
