Breve análisis del Dell Vostro 15 3568 (7200U, 256GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 195 cd/m²
Contraste: 443:1 (Negro: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 BOE0690 / NT15N41 / Dell C1JFR, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Lenovo NT156WHM-N42, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA ID: LGD0573, Name: LG Display LP156WF9-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -7% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.39 | 35.97 -9% | 36.79 -7% | 39.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 54.1 -9% | 55.4 -7% | 59.5 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.69 | 37.17 -9% | 38.01 -7% | 41.11 1% |
| Response Times | -11% | -45% | -69% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 44 ? -13% | 46 ? -18% | 38.4 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 12 ? -9% | 13 ? -18% | 26.4 ? -140% |
| PWM Frequency | 28410 ? | 200 ? -99% | ||
| Screen | 26% | -2% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 195 | 241 24% | 242 24% | 277.5 42% |
| Brightness | 195 | 229 17% | 233 19% | 265 36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 73 -18% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.46 -5% | 0.59 -34% | 0.35 20% |
| Contrast | 443 | 524 18% | 410 -7% | 793 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.23 | 3.4 72% | 10.9 11% | 4.8 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.85 | 7.61 64% | 20.84 -0% | 17.8 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.39 | 1.7 87% | 13.07 2% | 3 78% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.36 93% | 2.37 93% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 15759 41% | 6750 96% | 13123 50% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 34 -11% | 35 -8% | 37.7 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 54 -8% | 55 -7% | 69.3 17% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 2% /
14% | -18% /
-11% | -11% /
14% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 26 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 28410 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 28410 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 28410 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3417 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4544 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 53% | 237% | 21% | |
| Read Seq | 469.3 | 485.8 4% | 1589 239% | 503 7% |
| Write Seq | 179.7 | 456.1 154% | 1217 577% | 396 120% |
| Read 512 | 359.6 | 328 -9% | 1155 221% | 417.7 16% |
| Write 512 | 183.7 | 446.8 143% | 783 326% | 342 86% |
| Read 4k | 26.01 | 26.95 4% | 59.7 130% | 19.48 -25% |
| Write 4k | 68.7 | 86.7 26% | 148.8 117% | 64.6 -6% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 242.4 | 245.9 1% | 473.6 95% | 250.3 3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 147.1 | 300.2 104% | 428.7 191% | 94.3 -36% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1532 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5611 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.3 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 13.1 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 42.7 | 16.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 35.2 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 36.4 / 36.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Dell Vostro 15 3568 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.24 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 5.5 / 5.7 Watt |
| Carga |
27 / 27.4 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -6% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 4.1 -37% | 2.9 3% | 4.6 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 7.5 -36% | 5.8 -5% | 7.6 -38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 8.9 -56% | 6.6 -16% | 7.7 -35% |
| Load Average * | 27 | 28.1 -4% | 29 -7% | 35.1 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 27.4 | 28.3 -3% | 29.4 -7% | 36.2 -32% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 37 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -12% | 8% | -33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 874 | 855 -2% | 1083 24% | 614 -30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 379 | 350 -8% | 430 13% | 259 -32% |
| Load | 109 | 81 -26% | 95 -13% | 70 -36% |
| H.264 | 387 |
Pro
Contra
El cutrísimo display con su tinte azul extremo de fábrica, algo que no habíamos visto antes, es el único componente del nuevo Dell Vostro 15 3568 que podemos echar en cara al fabricante incluso a la vista del bajo precio de la configuración básica. La mejor parte del display ciertamente es la superficie mate. Las demás desventajas de nuestra lista de contras pesa mucho menos.
Si puedes ignorar el display (como sorprendentemente pueden muchos usuarios), tienes un portátil ofimático sencillo con movilidad limitada que maneja sus tareas adecuadamente. Se puede cambiar la batería con facilidad, trae un módulo TPM integrado para su seguridad, y Windows 10 Pro allana el camino a la encriptación de disco y las opciones administrativas ampliadas en la red de la empresa. Por el lado bueno, tendríamos que mencionar también los decentes dispositivos de entrada y el funcionamiento fresco y normalmente quedo.
Los puntos fuertes de nuestra versión del Dell Vostro 15 3568, que ha tenido éxito hasta cierto punto, son su SSD de 256 GB y W10 Pro, que pueden compensar la mala pantalla para algunos usuarios.
Un SSD y la versión Pro de Windows 10 sólo están disponibles con un pequeño sobrecargo, lo que sube el precio más hacia el de los competidores. Quien elija la variante mínima aún debería tener bastante rendimiento para la oficina. Sólo por el display no nos vemos capaces de dar una recomendación de compra.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell Vostro 15 3568
- 12/12/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
