Breve análisis del HP Omen 15t-ce000 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, UHD)
HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Omen 15t Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1063 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 387.92
Memoría
16 GB
, PC4-21300
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixels 282 PPI, AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 4K Anti-Glare Display with NVIDIA G-Sync Technology, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, 128 GB
, NVMe-SSD + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 & 1x 2.5-inch
Peso
2.628 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 920 g
Precio
1350 USD
Enlaces
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO23EB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 358.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.6 cd/m²iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 358.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 919:1 (Negro: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -39% | -42% | -0% | -5% | -1% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 39.01 -41% | 37.07 -44% | 65.2 -1% | 65.8 0% | 65.8 0% | 65.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 58.4 -36% | 55.6 -39% | 92.5 1% | 85.1 -7% | 90.9 -1% | 91.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 40.34 -40% | 38.32 -43% | 66.5 -1% | 62.2 -7% | 66.5 -1% | 66.3 -1% |
| Response Times | -11% | -3% | -22% | -23% | -21% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 39 ? -4% | 35.6 ? 5% | 42.8 ? -14% | 41 ? -9% | 43.2 ? -15% | 44 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 29 ? -17% | 27.6 ? -11% | 32 ? -29% | 34 ? -37% | 31.2 ? -26% | 26.4 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 26000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -22% | -27% | -6% | -3% | 9% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 358.5 | 283 -21% | 235.4 -34% | 320 -11% | 322 -10% | 304 -15% | 307 -14% |
| Brightness | 350 | 281 -20% | 223 -36% | 316 -10% | 297 -15% | 289 -17% | 297 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 91 -4% | 90 -5% | 86 -9% | 86 -9% | 92 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.39 -0% | 0.28 28% | 0.36 8% | 0.31 21% | 0.26 33% | 0.3 23% |
| Contrast | 919 | 726 -21% | 841 -8% | 889 -3% | 1039 13% | 1169 27% | 1023 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 6.1 -33% | 5.6 -22% | 4.62 -0% | 4.73 -3% | 3.46 25% | 4.72 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 11.08 -30% | 20.3 -139% | 9.75 -15% | 12.37 -46% | 7.72 9% | 8.07 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5.69 -9% | 3.6 31% | 6 -15% | 2.99 42% | 2.46 53% | 4.79 8% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.38 92% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6410 101% | 6702 97% | 7214 90% | 6761 96% | 6905 94% | 6915 94% | 7690 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.9 | 37 -45% | 35.2 -47% | 60 -10% | 56 -16% | 59 -12% | 60 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 58 -37% | 55.4 -40% | 92 0% | 85 -7% | 91 -1% | 92 0% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -24% /
-24% | -24% /
-27% | -9% /
-7% | -10% /
-6% | -4% /
3% | -4% /
-2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
ℹ
Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 54 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 37.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4325 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6901 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2484 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3969 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -9% | 32% | -436% | 133% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 736 | 197.3 -73% | 382.5 -48% | 988 34% | 1134 54% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 195.4 | 127.3 -35% | 274.8 41% | 424.4 117% | 534 173% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1087 | 497.6 -54% | 814 -25% | 1482 36% | 1936 78% |
| Score Total | 1515 | 1434 -5% | 2405 59% | 490 -68% | 3781 150% |
| Score Write | 361 | 368 2% | 594 65% | 24 -93% | 1556 331% |
| Score Read | 789 | 746 -5% | 1241 57% | 361 -54% | 1493 89% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.032 6% | 0.037 -9% | 1.987 -5744% | 0.026 24% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.07 1% | 0.058 18% | 0.067 6% | 0.04 44% |
| 4K-64 Write | 175.9 | 158.6 -10% | 375.8 114% | 2.12 -99% | 1262 617% |
| 4K-64 Read | 568 | 463.2 -18% | 929 64% | 112.5 -80% | 1206 112% |
| 4K Write | 111.2 | 127.9 15% | 100.2 -10% | 2.03 -98% | 141.1 27% |
| 4K Read | 43.09 | 46.98 9% | 46.95 9% | 38.45 -11% | 51.9 20% |
| Seq Write | 743 | 814 10% | 1181 59% | 200.3 -73% | 1530 106% |
| Seq Read | 1774 | 2362 33% | 2652 49% | 2103 19% | 2342 32% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Sequential Read:
1411 MB/s
Sequential Write:
749 MB/s
512K Read:
503 MB/s
512K Write:
174 MB/s
4K Read:
46.09 MB/s
4K Write:
130.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
518 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
173.9 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11761 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21508 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8725 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4487 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dirt 3 (2011) | 140.1 | 126.3 | 112.2 | 64.5 | |
| Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 218.4 | 192.7 | 164.7 | 69.5 | |
| Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 105.8 | 101 | 88.7 | 70 | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 308.4 | 277.7 | 170.5 | 115.6 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 209 | 193.3 | 180.1 | 102.4 | |
| GRID 2 (2013) | 210.8 | 152.8 | 143.3 | 116.7 | |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 68.9 | 65.7 | 63.4 | 40 | |
| Thief (2014) | 117.2 | 112 | 107.6 | 69 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 170.2 | 139.9 | 96.7 | 76.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 172.3 | 133.8 | 68.5 | 35 | 23.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 148.1 | 117.8 | 67.6 | 54.6 | 24 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 75.8 | 62.2 | 53.2 | 20.8 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 110.3 | 93 | 52 | 27.6 | 16.3 |
| Prey (2017) | 116 | 92.9 | 80.2 | 30.7 | |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 109 | 48 | 35.5 | 25.6 | 8.5 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 128 | 81 | 62 | 46 | 27 |
| ELEX (2017) | 108.1 | 83.5 | 69.6 | 57.2 | 17 |
The Witcher 3 ultra
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.5 / 49 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 7% | -7% | -5% | -8% | -18% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.6 -9% | 28 1% | 31 -10% | 30.4 -8% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 32 -5% | 30.9 -2% | 30 1% | 35 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 33 -9% | 30.9 -2% | 33 -9% | 36 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 34 -11% | 31.5 -3% | 37 -21% | 40 -31% |
| Load Average * | 38.5 | 34.6 10% | 30.3 21% | 39 -1% | 40.7 -6% | 41 -6% | 43 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 39.3 -5% | 39.5 -5% | 43 -14% | 45.5 -21% | 42 -12% | 49 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 41.7 15% | 46.5 5% | 50 -2% | 43.9 10% | 50 -2% | 55 -12% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de corriente
| Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.64 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.4 / 22.4 / 22.4 Watt |
| Carga |
78.1 / 133.52 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | 39% | 4% | 15% | -13% | -58% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 5.2 66% | 7.1 54% | 12 22% | 7.2 53% | 18 -17% | 26 -69% |
| Idle Average * | 22.4 | 8.3 63% | 7.6 66% | 15 33% | 10.5 53% | 23 -3% | 31 -38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 10.1 55% | 8.6 62% | 20 11% | 16 29% | 30 -34% | 36 -61% |
| Load Average * | 78.1 | 62.7 20% | 59.5 24% | 82 -5% | 82 -5% | 85 -9% | 93 -19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 97.5 | 94 4% | 89 9% | 111 -14% | 124 -27% | 96 2% | 176 -81% |
| Load Maximum * | 133.52 | 100 25% | 112.8 16% | 161 -21% | 155 -16% | 158 -18% | 240 -80% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 53% | 79% | 84% | 71% | -8% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 298 | 634 113% | 659 121% | 638 114% | 501 68% | 256 -14% | 208 -30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 208 | 310 49% | 416 100% | 422 103% | 357 72% | 198 -5% | 151 -27% |
| Load | 83 | 81 -2% | 96 16% | 112 35% | 144 73% | 80 -4% | 84 1% |
Pro
+ display 4K de primera, muy brillante
+ buen espectro de color
+ estilo único
+ buenos dispositivos de entrada
+ rendimiento muy aceptable
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ almacenamiento dual (PCIe SSD + HDD)
Contra
- muy poco aguante de batería
- bastante cálido y ruidoso a pesar del diseño Max-Q
- ruido de ventilador molesto
- adaptador de corriente ridículamente pesado
- tapa de display frágil
- notable sangrado de pantalla / clouding
No es muy difícil encontrarle fallos a los portátiles gaming más baratos, ya que el fabricante tiene que hacer equilibrios entre materiales relativamente baratos, buen aspecto, y hardware bastante potente para poder atraer al mayor número de usuarios posibles. Estamos tentados de criticar al Omen 15 por su concha metálica superior de bordes afilados, el notable sangrado de pantalla, o el molesto ventilador. Pero ninguno de los defectos es para echarse atrás en lo que a un sistema gaming se refiere: con todo, el HP Omen 15 es un sistema Max-Q asequible con bastantes redaños para manejar muchos títulos actuales al menos a Full HD.
El diseño más reciente con su estilo más descarado puede que no sea del gusto de todos, pero no cabe duda que la calidad de la construcción en sí es decente con buena rigidez torsional de la base y un lecho de teclado que no cede apenas. Los dispositivos de entrada funcionan bien, el hardware tiene potencia, y el brillante display UHD IPS - especialmente después del calibrado - es bastante increíble para el precio. El Omen 15 se calienta bastante, pero no tanto como otros sistemas. Los ventiladores, empero, son bastante molestos, ya que giran frecuentemente, y suelen producir un sonido oscilante que pone los nervios de punta.
Los usuarios que busquen un portátil gaming asequible de gama baja-media con display 4K deberían tener en su lista de candidatos al Omen 15.
El Dell Inspiron 15 tiene un display inferior, pero un rendimiento muy decente y aguanta el doble con una carga de batería.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Omen 15t-ce000
- 12/01/2017 v6 (old)
Bernhard Pechlaner
Gaming - media ponderada
Price comparison
