Breve análisis del HP Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
|
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1168:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w010ng AUO119B, 3840x2160 | Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 38% | 2% | 30% | 3% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 88.5 33% | 67.4 1% | 90 35% | 68 2% | 66.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 84.1 | 100 19% | 85.8 2% | 99.9 19% | 87.5 4% | 85.2 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.5 | 100 63% | 62.8 2% | 83.6 36% | 64 4% | 62.3 1% |
Response Times | -25% | 4% | 42% | 1% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 49 ? -32% | 36 ? 3% | 28 ? 24% | 33.6 ? 9% | 38 ? -3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 23 ? 4% | 9.6 ? 60% | 25.6 ? -7% | 22 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
Screen | -3% | -1% | 13% | -12% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 362 | 316 -13% | 314 -13% | 337.2 -7% | 329.2 -9% | 328 -9% |
Brightness | 342 | 312 -9% | 308 -10% | 315 -8% | 321 -6% | 317 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 92 6% | 86 -1% | 93 7% | 88 1% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.29 6% | 0.28 10% | 0.308 1% | 0.267 14% | 0.3 3% |
Contrast | 1168 | 1090 -7% | 1121 -4% | 1095 -6% | 1233 6% | 1093 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.69 -26% | 4.17 7% | 2.96 34% | 5.93 -32% | 3.74 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.31 | 7.94 15% | 8.94 4% | 5.45 41% | 11.07 -19% | 8.97 4% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.48 | 6.12 -76% | 3.84 -10% | 2.57 26% | 6.72 -93% | 2.67 23% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.56 86% | 2.41 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 6144 106% | 5875 111% | 6950 94% | 7114 91% | 7611 85% | 6861 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 87 58% | 56 2% | 74.3 35% | 57 4% | 56 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 100 19% | 86 2% | 100 19% | 87 4% | 85 1% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 3% /
2% | 2% /
0% | 28% /
21% | -3% /
-7% | 2% /
2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 4 ms subida | |
↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
37 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida | |
↘ 24 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Nexoc G734III |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Nexoc G734III | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
PCMark 7 Score | 5556 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4833 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7128 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5394 puntos | |
ayuda |
HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | HP Omen 17-w010ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 20% | 99% | -45% | -30% | 126% | |
Read Seq | 1156 | 1234 7% | 1917 66% | 334.3 -71% | 481.7 -58% | 1718 49% |
Write Seq | 294.9 | 583 98% | 1283 335% | 319 8% | 315.4 7% | 1305 343% |
Read 512 | 616 | 606 -2% | 871 41% | 242.3 -61% | 303.1 -51% | 1250 103% |
Write 512 | 294.7 | 428.3 45% | 1199 307% | 254.4 -14% | 314.4 7% | 1438 388% |
Read 4k | 42.7 | 41.42 -3% | 51 19% | 20.3 -52% | 25.93 -39% | 44.42 4% |
Write 4k | 153.3 | 137.2 -11% | 142.1 -7% | 42.51 -72% | 84.6 -45% | 154.4 1% |
Read 4k QD32 | 600 | 622 4% | 603 1% | 251.6 -58% | 273.9 -54% | 744 24% |
Write 4k QD32 | 295.3 | 348.3 18% | 382.4 29% | 167.1 -43% | 274.9 -7% | 578 96% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Nexoc G734III | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
HP Omen 17-w010ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14116 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 107777 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22908 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11779 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6894 puntos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4729 puntos | |
ayuda |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Nexoc G734III | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 197.1 | 171 | 161 | 103.8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 196.3 | 150 | 94.8 | 50.8 | 34 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 173 | 151.7 | 105.6 | 89.7 | 36.1 |
XCOM 2 (2016) | 86.4 | 74.9 | 66.1 | 39.2 | 22.8 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 107 | 93 | 83 | 79 | 37 |
Doom (2016) | 147.5 | 140.1 | 125.7 | 116.6 | 49.8 |
No Man's Sky (2016) | 118.6 | 114.5 | 104 | 48.7 | 43.3 |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 72.3 | 70.2 | 43.2 | 19 | |
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 176.3 | 159.5 | 118.9 | 110.1 | 45.7 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 45 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 2% | 3% | 0% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.4 5% | 29.7 1% | 30 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 32 3% | 31 6% | 31.9 3% | 33.2 -1% | 31 6% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 32 6% | 32 6% | 33.2 2% | 32 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 34 3% | 33 6% | 34 3% | 33.2 5% | 33 6% |
Load Average * | 45 | 41 9% | 49 -9% | 47 -4% | 47.5 -6% | 40 11% |
Load Maximum * | 52 | 51 2% | 50 4% | 49.4 5% | 52.5 -1% | 47 10% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -4% | -4% | -18% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 50.2 -12% | 50 -11% | 50.8 -13% | 59 -31% | 42.9 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 54.3 | 54.1 -0% | 60.5 -11% | 60 -10% | 66 -22% | 41.5 24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.6 | 28.9 2% | 29.1 2% | 27.4 7% | 33.2 -12% | 31.6 -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 24.3 15% | 26.9 6% | 28.8 -1% | 30.6 -7% | 29.5 -3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 19 / 25 / 31 Watt |
Carga |
90 / 193 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 11% | -14% | -16% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 19 | 10 47% | 13 32% | 22.6 -19% | 18.4 3% | 24 -26% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 19 24% | 20 20% | 32.7 -31% | 22.8 9% | 31 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 25 19% | 27 13% | 32.8 -6% | 24 23% | 36 -16% |
Load Average * | 90 | 83 8% | 90 -0% | 114.7 -27% | 175.5 -95% | 94 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 193 | 118 39% | 210 -9% | 167.9 13% | 229.5 -19% | 204 -6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh | HP Omen 17-w010ng 62 Wh | Nexoc G734III 60 Wh | MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 75.81 Wh | Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -11% | -16% | -25% | -11% | -23% | |
Reader / Idle | 432 | 435 1% | 400 -7% | 353 -18% | 418 -3% | 311 -28% |
H.264 | 233 | 214 -8% | 208 -11% | 186 -20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 247 | 240 -3% | 177 -28% | 213 -14% | 201 -19% | 210 -15% |
Load | 115 | 76 -34% | 95 -17% | 66 -43% | 103 -10% | 84 -27% |
Pro
Contra
Mucha gente piensa en portátiles de oficina business cuando oyen HP, pero el añadido Omen representa a la serie de gaming de HP. Nuestro modelo de pruebas Omen 17-w110ng puede cumplir con las expectativas para un portátil gaming. Los usuarios se llevan una potente combinación CPU/GPU dentro de un chasis estiloso, pero está hecho dep lástico y no tiene unidad óptica. La falta de dicha unidad no es tan importante cuando tienes en cuenta plataformas gaming como Steam, dónde puedes descargar tus juegos.
Algo cuestionable es la selección de puertos con sólo 3 puertos USB 3.0. Habríamos esperado al menos un puerto USB 3.1 Gen.2 con conector Type-C. HP debería también echarle otro vistazo a los dispositivos de entrada. HAblamos del touchpad en particular, que parece barato para este nivel de precio. Las dimensiones tampoco son perfectas, ya que una altura de sólo 6.5 cm no es muy generosa.
Con todo, el HP Omen 17-w110ng es un buen paquete por un precio justo. El rendimiento del sistema gaming no da motivo de quejas. El portátil va muy bien, y puedes disfrutar de juegos sin restricción alguna.
El paquete en general es bastante convincente, a pesar de los defectos mencionados. El rendimiento es muy bueno, y el dispositivo fue diseñado para jugones, lo que queda apoyado por nuestros resultados. La Intel Core i7-6700HQ ofrece rendimiento suficiente para todas las aplicaciones, e incluso se puede jugar a los juegos exigentes en FHD (a veces incluso 4K) gracias a la Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. El precio también es atractivo a 1800 Euros. Dispositivos similares de la competencia suelen costar 2000-2500 Euros, por lo que la serie Omen de HP definitivamente debería estar en tu lista.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Omen 17-w110ng
- 10/26/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade