Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
|
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 200 cd/m²
Contraste: 1429:1 (Negro: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.79% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Medion Akoya S4219 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 10% | 17% | 62% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 36.58 | 36.97 1% | 40.21 10% | 42.88 17% | 61.7 69% | |
sRGB Coverage | 54.9 | 55.6 1% | 60.5 10% | 64.1 17% | 84.8 54% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.79 | 38.2 1% | 41.55 10% | 44.3 17% | 62 64% | |
Response Times | 19% | 9% | 8% | 10% | 38% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53 ? | 36.4 ? 31% | 42 ? 21% | 47 ? 11% | 45 ? 15% | 33 ? 38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 25.2 ? 7% | 28 ? -4% | 26 ? 4% | 26 ? 4% | 17 ? 37% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? | ||||
Screen | -9% | -2% | -68% | -1% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 200 | 220 10% | 230 15% | 206 3% | 257 29% | 216 8% |
Brightness | 191 | 209 9% | 226 18% | 193 1% | 263 38% | 211 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 86 -4% | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 65 -28% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.28 -100% | 0.2 -43% | 0.48 -243% | 0.24 -71% | 0.2 -43% |
Contrast | 1429 | 786 -45% | 1150 -20% | 429 -70% | 1071 -25% | 1080 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.06 | 4.58 9% | 5.07 -0% | 11 -117% | 5.44 -8% | 3.7 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.91 | 11.47 -5% | 10.07 8% | 19.57 -79% | 10.93 -0% | 5.88 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 2.34 41% | 3.64 8% | 11.51 -192% | 3.95 -0% | 2.67 32% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.26 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.65 83% |
CCT | 6159 106% | 6661 98% | 6521 100% | 13671 48% | 6896 94% | 6418 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 34.6 -1% | 35 0% | 38.46 10% | 40 14% | 55 57% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | 54.2 -1% | 55 0% | 60.61 10% | 64 16% | 85 55% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 5% /
-4% | 3% /
0% | -17% /
-42% | 9% /
4% | 38% /
27% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 8 ms subida | |
↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
53 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 35 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 89 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3040 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Medion Akoya S4219 128 GB eMMC Flash | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12166% | -3% | 12735% | 1396% | 8742% | |
Read Seq | 113.3 | 484.1 327% | 108.9 -4% | 510 350% | 151.2 33% | 469.3 314% |
Write Seq | 110.2 | 449.8 308% | 103.2 -6% | 458.8 316% | 55.7 -49% | 309.1 180% |
Read 512 | 30.83 | 399.1 1195% | 399.7 1196% | 156.6 408% | ||
Write 512 | 47.13 | 355.1 653% | 299.3 535% | 46.9 0% | ||
Read 4k | 0.34 | 33.44 9735% | 0.362 6% | 35.27 10274% | 16.29 4691% | 14 4018% |
Write 4k | 0.981 | 67.5 6781% | 0.946 -4% | 90.2 9095% | 16.5 1582% | 73.9 7433% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.72 | 368.5 51081% | 0.721 0% | 397.7 55136% | 20.62 2764% | 149.5 20664% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.026 | 280.6 27249% | 0.901 -12% | 257.3 24978% | 18.86 1738% | 204.6 19842% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1538 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Medion Akoya S4219 |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.5 | 25 | 20.6 | 7.1 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 32.4 / 34.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.46 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.5 / 8.2 / 8.9 Watt |
Carga |
29.1 / 29.4 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Medion Akoya S4219 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
Pro
Contra
El Pavilion sólo difiere del modelo Skylake en procesador y disco duro. El 14" de HP trae un procesador Core i5 de Kaby Lake que debería satisfacer las necesidades de la mayoría de usuarios. El portátil puede funcionar en silencio cuando la opción BIOS Ventilador Siempre Activo se desactiva. Lo que es más, apenas se calienta. Trae un HDD de 500 GB. Habría que abrir la carcasa para cambiarlo por un SSD. El HP Pavilion no es particularmente sencillo en ese aspecto.
Los usuarios que quieran un 14" silencioso junto con una potente CPU para el uso doméstico pueden quedar satisfechos con el Pavilion.
No podemos dar otra razón de compra para el pequeño portátil. HP ha hecho demasiados recortes en todos los componentes. Aunque la pantalla instalada es un modelo IPS de ángulo de visión estable, sólo tiene un brillo reducido y una superficie lustrosa. Un portátil de 14" se hace para el uso móvil. Sin embargo, el aguante de batería del Pavilion lo impide. Más allá, HP sólo instala un puerto Fast Ethernet. Gigabit Ethernet es el estándar actual. Además, instala un lento módulo WiFi en el portátil. Los compradores pueden esperar un SSD en vez de un HDD por un precio de casi 600 Euros. Y por último, HP sólo ofrece un año de garantía.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
- 12/30/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck