Breve análisis del HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng

Name: HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Brand: HP

Buen paquete. El Hewlett Packard Pavilion 15-aw004ng es un portátil interesante. El todoterreno de 15.6" trae una pantalla mate FHD, un SSD, y un montaje de doble gráfica AMD. El precio de estas chuches: 550 Euros. Un precio como ese por un paquete como este puede convencer a la mayoría de compradores a que hagan la vista gorda con ciertos defectos, tales como el aguante de batería inferior a la media y la garantía de un año.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traducido por Francisco García), Published 09/29/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Laptop / Notebook Windows

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA (Pavilion 15-cx Serie)

Procesador

AMD A10-9600P 4 x 2.4 - 3.3 GHz, Bristol Ridge

Adaptador gráfico

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX - 2048 MB VRAM, Núcleo: 1021 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, Crimson 16.7.3, CrossFire

Memoría

8 GB

, DDR4-2132, Dual-Channel, dos ranuras (ocupadas)

pantalla

15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, Chi Mei, TN LED, lustroso: no

Placa base

AMD CZ FCH

Tarjeta de sonido

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexiones

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Equipamento de red

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidad óptica

hp DVDRW SU228HB

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 22.5 x 382 x 242

Battería

41 Wh Litio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionales

Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 12, McAfee LiveSafe-Internet Security (prueba), MS Office (prueba), 12 Meses Garantía

Peso

1.99 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 338 g

Precio

599 Euro

Enlaces

HP Pagina de inicio

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Asus F555UB-XO043T Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275	68.7 MB/s +20%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	57.3 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ	16.7 MB/s -71%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	16.5 MB/s -71%
Asus F555UB-XO043T	13.4 MB/s -77%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G	11.2 MB/s -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275	88.1 MB/s +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	85.3 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ	33.2 MB/s -61%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	26 MB/s -70%
Asus F555UB-XO043T	25.5 MB/s -70%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G	10.2 MB/s -88%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	276 MBit/s +188%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	96 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	334 MBit/s +237%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	99 MBit/s


229 cd/m²	237 cd/m²	231 cd/m²
214 cd/m²	240 cd/m²	222 cd/m²
225 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	223 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

Chi Mei tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 240 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 227.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 139 cd/m²
Contraste: 490:1 (Negro: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA TN LED, 1920x1080	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G TN LED, 1920x1080	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ TN LED, 1920x1080	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 IPS, 1920x1080	Asus F555UB-XO043T TN LED, 1366x768	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK TN LED, 1366x768
Display		-8%	-1%	47%	-5%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	40.35	37.13 -8%	39.82 -1%	64.1 59%	38.22 -5%	37.06 -8%
sRGB Coverage	60.3	55.9 -7%	59.7 -1%	82.9 37%	57.5 -5%	55.8 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.71	38.36 -8%	41.16 -1%	60.6 45%	39.49 -5%	38.29 -8%
Response Times		-3%	-5%	25%	-15%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(19, 22)	45 ?(24, 21) -10%	43 ?(21, 22) -5%	24 ?(12, 12) 41%	46 ?(24, 22) -12%	27 ?(7, 20) 34%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(10, 13)	22 ?(6, 16) 4%	24 ?(8, 16) -4%	21 ?(6, 15) 9%	27 ?(10, 17, Spikes in between) -17%	22 ?(11, 11) 4%
PWM Frequency				50 ?(30)	50 ?(60)	50 ?(80)
Screen		-3%	-3%	46%	9%	5%
Brightness middle	240	200 -17%	238 -1%	294 23%	214 -11%	200 -17%
Brightness	228	196 -14%	221 -3%	285 25%	205 -10%	198 -13%
Brightness Distribution	89	76 -15%	84 -6%	83 -7%	82 -8%	83 -7%
Black Level *	0.49	0.34 31%	0.49 -0%	0.26 47%	0.46 6%	0.28 43%
Contrast	490	588 20%	486 -1%	1131 131%	465 -5%	714 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.96	11.54 -5%	11.19 -2%	5.07 54%	6.52 41%	10.63 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.36	19.36 -5%	19.6 -7%	9.33 49%	9.1 50%	15.69 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.34	12.98 -14%	11.53 -2%	4.25 63%	7.05 38%	11.19 1%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.58 ^85%	2.41 ^91%	2.49 ^88%	2.41 ^91%	1.78 ^124%
CCT	12292 ^53%	14060 ^46%	13057 ^50%	6597 ^99%	8623 ^75%	11258 ^58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	36 -8%	38 -3%	54 38%	36.6 -6%	35 -10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60	56 -7%	60 0%	83 38%	57.8 -4%	56 -7%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		-5% / -4%	-3% / -2%	39% / 43%	-4% / 3%	5% / 5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 10 ms subida
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 13 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 19 ms subida
41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4769

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

6077

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2520

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

24.74 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.87 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

32.05 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

215 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

75 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +75%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points +53%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points +52%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV Intel Core i3-5010U	87 Points +16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	85 Points +13%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	78 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	75 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	74 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points +45%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +34%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	282 Points +31%
HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV Intel Core i3-5010U	219 Points +2%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	217 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	215 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	207 Points -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	195 Points -9%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	10803 Points +78%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	9936 Points +64%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	7776 Points +28%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	7222 Points +19%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	6820 Points +12%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	6385 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	6077 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	4984 Points +98%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	4357 Points +73%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	4315 Points +71%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	3114 Points +24%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2520 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD FX-8800P	2417 Points -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2325 Points -8%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	2754 Points +35%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	2577 Points +26%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	2167 Points +6%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2039 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	1944 Points -5%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	6007 Points +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	5558 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	5445 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	4550 Points -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	4540 Points -17%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	212.3 Points +66%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	186.4 Points +46%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	181.3 Points +42%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	127.6 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	109.9 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	3232 ms * -54%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	2267 ms * -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2098 ms *
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	1337 ms * +36%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	1279 ms * +39%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Intel Core i5-6200U	27029 Points +43%
Asus F555UB-XO043T Intel Core i5-6200U	26586 Points +41%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	18921 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD A10-8700P	15801 Points -16%
Asus F555LJ-XX110H Intel Core i3-5010U	10182 Points -46%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

PCMark 7 Score		4340 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2904 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3569 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3883 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points +20%
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	3305 Points +14%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	2961 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	2904 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	2806 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	2485 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	4281 Points +10%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4095 Points +5%
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	4091 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	3883 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	3540 Points -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	3290 Points -15%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 503 MB/s

Sequential Write: 316.6 MB/s

512K Read: 261.9 MB/s

512K Write: 281.2 MB/s

4K Read: 17.04 MB/s

4K Write: 46.55 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 125 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 131.4 MB/s

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	Asus F555UB-XO043T Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-88%	-89%	67%	-89%
Read Seq	503	110.7 -78%	96.3 -81%	490.6 -2%	108.5 -78%
Write Seq	316.6	108.9 -66%	95.9 -70%	304.1 -4%	106.2 -66%
Read 512	261.9	36.71 -86%	36.46 -86%	414.6 58%	34.52 -87%
Write 512	281.2	53.7 -81%	42.75 -85%	299.6 7%	42.45 -85%
Read 4k	17.04	0.415 -98%	0.451 -97%	36.82 116%	0.391 -98%
Write 4k	46.55	1.261 -97%	0.895 -98%	99.5 114%	0.855 -98%
Read 4k QD32	125	1.126 -99%	0.847 -99%	333.4 167%	0.774 -99%
Write 4k QD32	131.4	1.312 -99%	0.892 -99%	236.8 80%	0.852 -99%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		8878 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result		6853 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance		2979 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		44367 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5225 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1678 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		686 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score		315 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P	3819 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	3775 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	2681 Points -29%
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2336 Points -38%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	2210 Points -41%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2138 Points -43%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1835 Points -51%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	12483 Points
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G AMD Radeon R8 M365DX, AMD FX-8800P	10534 Points -16%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	8935 Points -28%
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	8405 Points -33%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	8324 Points -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	6127 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	2209 Points
Asus F555UB-XO043T NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i5-6200U	1570 Points -29%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	1497 Points -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ AMD Radeon R6 M340DX, AMD A10-8700P	1472 Points -33%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P	1205 Points -45%

	bajo	medio	alto	ultra
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	82	77.8	71.7	50.3
Tomb Raider (2013)	83.6	55.7	46.3	21.8
BioShock Infinite (2013)	72.7	42.9	33.7	11.7
Battlefield 4 (2013)	50.1	37.2	23.4	7.7
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)	33.3	21.3	12.2
Alien: Isolation (2014)	51.6	42.7	28
F1 2014 (2014)	59	42	39	24
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)	40.8	27.8	9.6
Battlefield Hardline (2015)	37.7	29.3	14	8.3
GTA V (2015)	54.6	52.4	11.7
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	19	17	7
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	37.5	13.3
FIFA 16 (2015)	77.5		53.8	25
Anno 2205 (2015)	36	17.8	7.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015)	38.1	26.2	11.7
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)	15.9	13.1	6.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	53.5	33.7	13.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	24.4	13.9	7.7
XCOM 2 (2016)	22	8	5.2
Far Cry Primal (2016)	23	10	9
The Division (2016)	23.3	15.1	7.1
Hitman 2016 (2016)	18.6	17.7	10.5
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	25.6	22.6	11.7	9.5
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	14.2	7	6.2
Doom (2016)	22.4	12.8	8.3
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	26.4	12.8	5.8
No Man's Sky (2016)	21.8	18	10
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	15.1	10.9	5.4

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus F555UB-XO043T GeForce 940M, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	48.3 fps +13%
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	47 fps +10%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	42.9 fps
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P	42.8 fps 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	41.8 fps -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	26.1 fps -39%

Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	58.4 fps +5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	55.7 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	45.3 fps -19%

Battlefield 4 - 1024x768 Low Preset
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng Radeon R7 M440, A10-9600P	51.6 fps +3%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	50.1 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	40 fps -20%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	36.4 fps -27%

FIFA 16 - 1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	53.8 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	40.4 fps -25%
Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Radeon R8 M365DX, FX-8800P, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	fps -100%

GTA V - 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	60.7 fps +11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	54.6 fps

F1 2014 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	46 fps +18%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	39 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Radeon R6 M340DX, A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	33 fps -15%

Counter-Strike: GO - 1366x768 High AA:2x MS AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P	71.7 fps

Ruido

Ocioso		31.7 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB(A)
HDD		32.2 dB(A)
DVD		36.6 / dB(A)
Carga		41 / 42.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Noise		3%	0%	9%	-4%	-1%
off / environment *	31.2	31.3 -0%	31.3 -0%	22 29%		31.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	31.7	32.4 -2%	33.1 -4%	31.3 1%	34 -7%	32.6 -3%
Idle Average *	31.9	33.2 -4%	33.3 -4%	31.3 2%	34 -7%	32.6 -2%
Idle Maximum *	31.9	33.2 -4%	33.5 -5%	32.2 -1%	34.2 -7%	33.8 -6%
Load Average *	41	36.5 11%	38.9 5%	36.4 11%	38.9 5%	40.2 2%
Load Maximum *	42.7	34.4 19%	38.9 9%	36.6 14%	43.6 -2%	40.4 5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


25 °C	33 °C	33.4 °C
25 °C	28.1 °C	29.1 °C
24 °C	27 °C	25.5 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C


32.1 °C	32.4 °C	26.1 °C
30.4 °C	32.9 °C	26.3 °C
24.7 °C	27.8 °C	25.9 °C

Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C

Conector de corriente 41.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Heat		-5%	-4%	-13%	-8%	-10%
Maximum Upper Side *	33.4	34 -2%	36 -8%	42.5 -27%	33.2 1%	38.6 -16%
Maximum Bottom *	32.9	39.6 -20%	39.2 -19%	46.9 -43%	44 -34%	42 -28%
Idle Upper Side *	27.7	27.7 -0%	27.1 2%	25.8 7%	28.2 -2%	28.1 -1%
Idle Bottom *	29.4	29 1%	26.6 10%	26 12%	28.1 4%	28.1 4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.65 Watt
Ocioso	5.5 / 8.2 / 9.5 Watt
Carga	44.5 / 58 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G FX-8800P, Radeon R8 M365DX	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ A10-8700P, Radeon R6 M340DX	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 6200U, GeForce 930M	Asus F555UB-XO043T 6200U, GeForce 940M	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX
Power Consumption		-2%	-10%	4%	13%	2%
Idle Minimum *	5.5	6.7 -22%	6.8 -24%	4.7 15%	4.7 15%	7 -27%
Idle Average *	8.2	9.8 -20%	10.5 -28%	9.9 -21%	6.5 21%	8 2%
Idle Maximum *	9.5	10.6 -12%	11 -16%	10.1 -6%	6.8 28%	8.4 12%
Load Average *	44.5	46 -3%	41.6 7%	36 19%	42.7 4%	38.8 13%
Load Maximum *	58	32 45%	51 12%	51 12%	59 -2%	52.8 9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		9h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		4h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 14min
Carga (máximo brillo)		1h 35min

	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA 41 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G 37 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ 32 Wh	Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 45 Wh	Asus F555UB-XO043T 37 Wh
Duración de Batería		-32%	-32%	33%	37%
Reader / Idle	560	400 -29%	365 -35%
H.264	194		168 -13%
WiFi v1.3	260	168 -35%	183 -30%	345 33%	355 37%
Load	95		49 -48%

Pro

+ pantalla mate

+ FHD

+ veloz SSD

+ apenas se calienta

Contra

- sólo 12 meses de garantía

- sin escotilla de mantenimiento

- sin USB Type-C

- aguante de batería mediocre

- muy poco brillo en batería

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

El procesador AMD del modelo de pruebas ofrece suficiente rendimiento para el uso diario. Lo que es más, el portátil es quedo la mayor parte del tiempo y apenas se calienta. Un veloz SSD asegura que el sistema vaya fluido. Por desgracia, el portátil no tiene escotilla de mantenimiento. Para cambiar el SSD hay que abrir la carcasa. El teclado basta para el uso doméstico y el aguante de batería no tiene nada de especial. El Pavilion podría haber sido mejor en estas áreas.

Por unos 550 Euros, el Pavilion 15-aw004ng es un buen todoterreno para los usuarios con necesidades básicas.

Por un precio relativamente bajo, HP incluye un display FHD y un sistema de doble gráfica. Por otro lado, el panel no es muy brillante y tiene poco ángulo de visión y contraste. El sistema en sí está cubierto por una garantía de 1 año. Con todo, HP ofrece un portátil de 15.6" de bajo precio con claros defectos, que puede resultar útil para algunos usuarios.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA - 09/22/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado

73 / 98 → 74%

Teclado

73%

Ratón

81%

Conectividad

40 / 81 → 49%

Peso

63 / 20-67 → 91%