Breve análisis del Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15ISK
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE | |
| Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
| Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (seb) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK (seb) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (seb) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK (seb) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 200 cd/m²
Contraste: 714:1 (Negro: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.19 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.06% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.78
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK TN LED, 1366x768 | Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G TN LED, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ TN LED, 1920x1080 | HP 250 G4 T6P08ES TN LED, 1366x768 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE TN, 1366x768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 7% | 18% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.06 | 37.13 0% | 39.82 7% | 43.63 18% | 36.7 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 55.8 | 55.9 0% | 59.7 7% | 65.1 17% | 55.3 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.29 | 38.36 0% | 41.16 7% | 45.1 18% | 37.92 -1% |
| Response Times | -34% | -34% | 482% | 109% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27 ? | 45 ? -67% | 43 ? -59% | 42 ? -56% | 22 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 22 ? -0% | 24 ? -9% | 24 ? -9% | 20 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 806 ? 1512% | 200 ? 300% | ||
| Screen | -9% | -9% | -5% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 200 | 200 0% | 238 19% | 220 10% | 251 26% |
| Brightness | 198 | 196 -1% | 221 12% | 203 3% | 236 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 76 -8% | 84 1% | 83 0% | 85 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.34 -21% | 0.49 -75% | 0.49 -75% | 0.44 -57% |
| Contrast | 714 | 588 -18% | 486 -32% | 449 -37% | 570 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.63 | 11.54 -9% | 11.19 -5% | 8.95 16% | 14.58 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.69 | 19.36 -23% | 19.6 -25% | 15.89 -1% | 24.59 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.19 | 12.98 -16% | 11.53 -3% | 10.59 5% | 16.8 -50% |
| Gamma | 1.78 124% | 2.58 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.51 88% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 11258 58% | 14060 46% | 13057 50% | 12049 54% | 27039 24% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 36 3% | 38 9% | 41 17% | 35 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 56 0% | 60 7% | 65 16% | 56 0% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -14% /
-11% | -12% /
-9% | 165% /
91% | 30% /
9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 80 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 80 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida |   |
| ↘ 11 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3497 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3825 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4281 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 | Acer Aspire E5-552G-F62G Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX | Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 | HP 250 G4 T6P08ES HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -2% | -17% | -3% | -30% | |
| Read Seq | 115.9 | 110.7 -4% | 96.3 -17% | 101 -13% | 105.6 -9% |
| Write Seq | 113.3 | 108.9 -4% | 95.9 -15% | 99.6 -12% | 93.4 -18% |
| Read 512 | 39.02 | 36.71 -6% | 36.46 -7% | 38.12 -2% | 31.7 -19% |
| Write 512 | 55.6 | 53.7 -3% | 42.75 -23% | 42.22 -24% | 27.54 -50% |
| Read 4k | 0.44 | 0.415 -6% | 0.451 3% | 0.522 19% | 0.374 -15% |
| Write 4k | 1.188 | 1.261 6% | 0.895 -25% | 1.29 9% | 0.72 -39% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.125 | 1.126 0% | 0.847 -25% | 1.116 -1% | 0.694 -38% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.245 | 1.312 5% | 0.892 -28% | 1.287 3% | 0.646 -48% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1983 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 38 | 22.2 | 15.9 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 76.9 | 41.8 | 34.8 | |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 42.9 | 32.4 | 18.4 | |
| Sims 4 (2014) | 171.4 | 63.4 | 34.1 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 35.2 | 22.6 | 12.4 | |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 58.9 | 38.8 | 19.9 | |
| F1 2014 (2014) | 96 | 79 | 46 | 25 |
| Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 45.4 | 29.2 | 16.4 | |
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 65.1 | 44.6 | 15.6 | |
| GTA V (2015) | 60.7 | 52.5 | 12.5 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 22.1 | 13.6 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 43.6 | 15.4 | |
| Mad Max (2015) | 26.2 | 14.6 | ||
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 40.2 | 22.3 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 18.8 | 15.9 | ||
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 25.6 | 8.9 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 13.7 | 7.3 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 29.5 | 24.1 | ||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 34.9 | 20.5 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo E51-80 80QB0008GE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| Sims 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Dell Inspiron 17-5758 | |
| Lenovo B70-80 80MR0006GE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| Battlefield Hardline - 1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
| Dell Inspiron 17-5758 | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.6 / 33.8 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 40.2 / 40.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 8 / 8.4 Watt |
| Carga |
38.8 / 52.8 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
Lenovo ofrece un portátil multimedia de 15.6". El IdeaPad 310-15ISK tiene bastante rendimiento para la mayoría de usuarios. El procesador Core i7 podría ser incluso demasiado, vistas las necesidades del portátil. Lo que es más, esta CPU encarece el modelo de pruebas. Recomendamos a los compradores potenciales que elijan un modelo Core i5 del IdeaPad, que irá mejor con la GPU GeForce 920MX del portátil.
Ésta ejecuta muchos juegos con fluidez. Sin embargo, los juegos exigentes tales como “Rise of the Tomb Raider”, ni siquiera arrancan. El portátil ni hace mucho ruido ni se calienta demasiado. Gracias al HDD de 1 TB, el usuario tiene suficiente espacio de almacenamiento. Las dos escotillas de mantenimiento permiten al usuario cambiar fácilmente el disco duro.
El teclado tiene una cómoda resistencia de tecla. Basta para el uso doméstico. El aguante de batería es decente, pero la pantalla es mala. Aunque ofrece un buen contraste, el brillo es demasiado bajo. Lo que es más, los ángulos de visión son malos ya que Lenovo ha elegido un panel TN.
Es difícil recomendar el IdeaPad 310-15ISK a los compradores, ya que el fabricante no da razones de peso. El portátil no es barato, ni su relación precio-rendimiento es adecuada. Por este precio haría falta una GPU GeForce 940MX y un veloz SSD, en vez de un HDD de 1 TB. Lo que es más, la pantalla debería ser mucho mejor. Para aumentar el atractivo de este modelo, Lenovo tendrá que rebajar mucho el precio.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
- 09/08/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
