Breve análisis del Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Medion Akoya P6670 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Seb) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Medion Akoya P6670 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Seb) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1265:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Akoya P6670 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -13% | -10% | -11% | -5% | -4% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.66 | 39.26 -8% | 37.06 -13% | 38.57 -10% | 38.14 -11% | 40.35 -5% | 41.1 -4% | 39.82 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64.1 | 58.7 -8% | 55.8 -13% | 57.4 -10% | 57.2 -11% | 60.3 -6% | 61.8 -4% | 59.7 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.08 | 40.59 -8% | 38.29 -13% | 39.89 -10% | 39.43 -11% | 41.71 -5% | 42.46 -4% | 41.16 -7% |
| Response Times | 20% | 30% | 31% | 20% | 30% | 29% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 40 ? 22% | 27 ? 47% | 39 ? 24% | 42 ? 18% | 41 ? 20% | 36 ? 29% | 43 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 38 ? | 24 ? 37% | 22 ? 42% | 24 ? 37% | 22 ? 42% | 23 ? 39% | 27 ? 29% | 24 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? 0% | 50 ? 0% | 50 0% | ||||
| Screen | -30% | -56% | -55% | -34% | -66% | -21% | -69% | |
| Brightness middle | 291 | 284 -2% | 200 -31% | 176 -40% | 287 -1% | 240 -18% | 241 -17% | 238 -18% |
| Brightness | 265 | 276 4% | 198 -25% | 169 -36% | 269 2% | 228 -14% | 240 -9% | 221 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 80 -7% | 83 -3% | 91 6% | 74 -14% | 89 3% | 92 7% | 84 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.33 -43% | 0.28 -22% | 0.47 -104% | 0.65 -183% | 0.49 -113% | 0.5 -117% | 0.49 -113% |
| Contrast | 1265 | 861 -32% | 714 -44% | 374 -70% | 442 -65% | 490 -61% | 482 -62% | 486 -62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.78 | 7.21 -51% | 10.63 -122% | 8.83 -85% | 5.42 -13% | 10.96 -129% | 4.46 7% | 11.19 -134% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.51 | 15.12 -59% | 15.69 -65% | 14.01 -47% | 9.54 -0% | 18.36 -93% | 6.84 28% | 19.6 -106% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.49 | 6.86 -97% | 11.19 -221% | 8.97 -157% | 5.14 -47% | 11.34 -225% | 4.83 -38% | 11.53 -230% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 2.46 89% | 1.78 124% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.27 97% | 2.49 88% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 6013 108% | 6726 97% | 11258 58% | 10234 64% | 6952 93% | 12292 53% | 7773 84% | 13057 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 37 -7% | 35 -12% | 36.8 -8% | 36 -10% | 39 -2% | 39 -2% | 38 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 58 -9% | 56 -12% | 57.3 -10% | 57 -11% | 60 -6% | 62 -3% | 60 -6% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -6% /
-17% | -13% /
-32% | -11% /
-35% | -8% /
-20% | -14% /
-41% | 1% /
-11% | -16% /
-44% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 10 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 10 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 30 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 51 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 33 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 86 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Akoya P6670 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Akoya P6670 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3778 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256 | Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND | Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -93% | -89% | -93% | -25% | -29% | -6% | -91% | |
| Read Seq | 469.2 | 84.5 -82% | 115.9 -75% | 95.3 -80% | 441.8 -6% | 503 7% | 434.9 -7% | 96.3 -79% |
| Write Seq | 431.5 | 69.9 -84% | 113.3 -74% | 85.6 -80% | 398 -8% | 316.6 -27% | 318.3 -26% | 95.9 -78% |
| Read 512 | 338.3 | 28.87 -91% | 39.02 -88% | 29.32 -91% | 295.5 -13% | 261.9 -23% | 311.8 -8% | 36.46 -89% |
| Write 512 | 297.9 | 28.08 -91% | 55.6 -81% | 25.93 -91% | 75.5 -75% | 281.2 -6% | 319.2 7% | 42.75 -86% |
| Read 4k | 28.68 | 0.326 -99% | 0.44 -98% | 0.366 -99% | 31.19 9% | 17.04 -41% | 18.23 -36% | 0.451 -98% |
| Write 4k | 66.8 | 0.595 -99% | 1.188 -98% | 0.726 -99% | 60 -10% | 46.55 -30% | 85.4 28% | 0.895 -99% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 364.7 | 0.602 -100% | 1.125 -100% | 0.647 -100% | 258 -29% | 125 -66% | 323.8 -11% | 0.847 -100% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 245.9 | 0.612 -100% | 1.245 -99% | 0.722 -100% | 85.7 -65% | 131.4 -47% | 253 3% | 0.892 -100% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2535 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 85.9 | 48.6 | 39.1 | 13.5 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 37.7 | 24.6 | 13.6 | 10 |
| GTA V (2015) | 63.2 | 56.9 | 13.6 | 5.7 |
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 94.8 | 77.6 | 38 | 36.8 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 48.2 | 27.3 | 13.5 | 12.1 |
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 129.1 | 81.3 | 35.4 | 23.9 |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 57.9 | 39 | 15.5 | 14.4 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 35.3 / 37.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.4 / 9.5 Watt |
| Carga |
41 / 48 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
El todoterreno Lenovo de 15.6" tiene bastante potencia de cálculo para los usos comunes. La gráfica GeForce instalada renderiza los juegos de forma fluida. El portátil sólo se calienta moderadamente incluso bajo carga. Un veloz SSD asegura un sistema rápido. Un HDD de 2.5" de 1 TB lo complementa. Sendos dispositivos de almacenamiento se pueden cambiar con facilidad ya que quedan accesibles desde fuera. No hace falta abrir la carcasa para ello. El teclado instalado causa una impresión decente. El panel IPS tiene un ángulo de visión estable y muy buen contraste, pero podría ser más brillante.
Con el Ideapad 510-15IKB, Lenovo ofrece un todoterreno bien equipado que muestra defectos a pesar de un precio de casi 1000 Euros.
El Ideapad sólo tiene una batería de baja capacidad (30 Wh). En consecuencia, el portátil sólo ofrece un aguante de batería mediocre. La gestión del ventilador debería renovarse para que prevalezca el silencio en el modo inactivo. Además, esperamos un puerto USB Type-C en el año 2016.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
- 11/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
