Breve análisis del Lenovo ThinkPad 13 (Core i3-7100U, Full HD)
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 |
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
|
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 266.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 859:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.92% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Lenovo LEN4094, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 LP133WF2-SPL1, , 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, TN LED, 14", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -7% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.57 | 38.35 -5% | 37.63 -7% | 40.21 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.7 | 57.4 -5% | 56.7 -7% | 60.5 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.92 | 39.66 -5% | 38.88 -7% | 41.55 -1% |
Response Times | -5% | -10% | -10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.8 ? | 43.2 ? -32% | 50 ? -52% | 47 ? -43% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 26.8 ? 22% | 23 ? 33% | 26 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | 3% | -56% | -50% | |
Brightness middle | 266.4 | 233 -13% | 241 -10% | 206 -23% |
Brightness | 250 | 227 -9% | 226 -10% | 193 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 89 1% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.22 29% | 0.48 -55% | 0.48 -55% |
Contrast | 859 | 1059 23% | 502 -42% | 429 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 5.41 -2% | 12.43 -135% | 11 -108% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21 | 13.61 35% | 21.03 -0% | 19.57 7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 4.15 -26% | 13.24 -301% | 11.51 -249% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.45 90% | 2.61 84% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6843 95% | 6773 96% | 15733 41% | 13671 48% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 36.52 -4% | 36 -5% | 38.46 1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 57.16 -5% | 57 -5% | 60.61 1% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -2% /
0% | -24% /
-40% | -20% /
-35% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
34.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21.2 ms subida | |
↘ 13.2 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 91 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
32.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 14.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 40 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE |
PCMark 7 Score | 3294 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3163 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3886 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4139 puntos | |
ayuda |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 16% | -87% | -90% | 25% | |
Read Seq | 447.3 | 461.7 3% | 120.4 -73% | 108.9 -76% | 524 17% |
Write Seq | 331.3 | 297.8 -10% | 123.1 -63% | 103.2 -69% | 466.9 41% |
Read 512 | 315.7 | 351.6 11% | 34.31 -89% | 404 28% | |
Write 512 | 247.2 | 298.4 21% | 66.8 -73% | 292.5 18% | |
Read 4k | 34.46 | 31.85 -8% | 0.373 -99% | 0.362 -99% | 33.08 -4% |
Write 4k | 76.1 | 68.5 -10% | 1.29 -98% | 0.946 -99% | 80.2 5% |
Read 4k QD32 | 235.3 | 360.9 53% | 0.976 -100% | 0.721 -100% | 379.4 61% |
Write 4k QD32 | 162.2 | 276.2 70% | 1.285 -99% | 0.901 -99% | 216.2 33% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 34539 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4409 puntos | |
ayuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
1366x768 High Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE |
Ashes of the Singularity - 1280x768 low (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 35 | 22 | 11 | |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 8.9 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 28.7 / 28.7 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 31.2 / 35.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS HD Graphics 620, i3-7100U | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX) | Dell Latitude 14 3470 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES HD Graphics 620, i3-7100U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -12% | -7% | -10% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 31.2 -9% | 29.2 -2% | 30.9 -8% | 30.5 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.3 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 30 -5% | 30.5 -6% |
Idle Average * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.3 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 31.8 -11% | 30.5 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 29.1 -1% | 32.5 -13% | 32.3 -13% | 33.5 -17% | 30.6 -7% |
Load Average * | 31.2 | 31.5 -1% | 36 -15% | 33.3 -7% | 35.7 -14% | 31 1% |
Load Maximum * | 35.9 | 33.5 7% | 38.8 -8% | 33.4 7% | 38.5 -7% | 36.8 -3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.51 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.7 / 6.2 Watt |
Carga |
24.1 / 28.5 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -19% | -25% | -20% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.1 11% | 5.2 -49% | 5 -43% | 5.7 -63% | 4.1 -17% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 5.5 4% | 7.25 -27% | 6.8 -19% | 6.8 -19% | 6.8 -19% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 6 3% | 7.9 -27% | 8.9 -44% | 7.8 -26% | 7.9 -27% |
Load Average * | 24.1 | 25.8 -7% | 25.1 -4% | 26.2 -9% | 20.2 16% | 20.4 15% |
Load Maximum * | 28.5 | 33.6 -18% | 25.1 12% | 31.8 -12% | 30.6 -7% | 26.8 6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4 Z2Y47ES i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -9% | 9% | -20% | 22% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 989 | 944 -5% | 885 -11% | 668 -32% | 1210 22% | 749 -24% |
WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 372 -36% | 566 -2% | 278 -52% | 463 -20% | |
Load | 113 | 129 14% | 157 39% | 140 24% | 133 18% | |
WiFi | 603 |
Pro
Contra
El ThinkPad 13 descansa en un buen puesto. Mantiene muchos de los puntos sobresalientes de sus hermanos ThinkPad más maduros, las series T y X. El teclado es de los mejores que hay, el aguante de batería da para una jornada laboral completa, y el rendimiento es adecuado, si no un poco decepcionante. Sin embargo, han tenido que hacer recortes para mantener bajo el precio. Al teclado le falta iluminación, lo que daña una experiencia de mecanografiado por lo demás excelente, y la falta de Thunderbolt 3 limita severamente las opciones de conectividad.
Quizá el mayor inconveniente aquí sea el precio. Para un sistema de más de $1000, nuestro ThinkPad 13 ofrece unas especificaciones ciertamente deslucidas. Hasta el modelo base del ThinkPad 13 con Intel Celeron 3865U (1.8 GHz, 2 MB Cache) y display TN 1366x768 arranca en $700 a fecha de redacción. Hay varios dispositivos con mejores entrañas a precios muy inferiores. Aunque no los incluimos en nuestras comparaciones, tanto el Asus Zenbook UX305UA como el Dell XPS 13 (2016) pueden configurarse con el doble de RAM y almacenamiento y con una CPU ULV Core i5 por un precio similar al de nuestro modelo de pruebas (y a veces por menos).
En general, el ThinkPad 13 es un paquete atractivo para usuarios business que necesiten algo entre la serie Lenovo X de 12.5" y la serie T de 14". El gran aguante de la batería y los estelares dispositivos de entrada compensan algunos de los sacrificios hechos. Sin embargo, actualizarse a Kaby Lake no merece la pena el elevado precio. Como tal, sugerimos que o esperes a que Lenovo ponga el dispositivo en rebajas o encuentres un ThinkPad 13 2016 más barato con un procesador Skylake.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
- 04/28/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley