Breve análisis del Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 78 %
Brillo con batería: 236 cd/m²
Contraste: 1311:1 (Negro: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 0% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.92 | 42.58 2% | 41.84 0% | 38.04 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.9 | 63.9 2% | 62.7 0% | 57.1 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.32 | 43.99 2% | 43.25 0% | 39.3 -9% |
| Response Times | 0% | 119% | 18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53 ? | 43.2 ? 18% | 30.8 ? 42% | 42 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 30.8 ? -18% | 22 ? 15% | 22 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 200 ? 300% | ||
| Screen | -7% | -6% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 236 | 254 8% | 225 -5% | 266 13% |
| Brightness | 212 | 230 8% | 210 -1% | 249 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 86 10% | 85 9% | 85 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.26 -44% | 0.22 -22% | 0.26 -44% |
| Contrast | 1311 | 977 -25% | 1023 -22% | 1023 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 4.23 -8% | 4.13 -5% | 4.98 -27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.2 | 9.5 -3% | 9.36 -2% | 11.82 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 2.87 -22% | 2.53 -8% | 2.68 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.6 85% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6161 106% | 5965 109% | 6360 102% | 6583 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 40.35 1% | 39.8 0% | 36 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 63.48 1% | 62.5 -1% | 57 -10% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -2% /
-5% | 38% /
19% | -1% /
-7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 50 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 50 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8702 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 53 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 34 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 89 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3694 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -13% | -92% | -25% | |
| Read Seq | 529 | 487 -8% | 106.9 -80% | 458.6 -13% |
| Write Seq | 508 | 450.7 -11% | 106 -79% | 270 -47% |
| Read 512 | 409.8 | 384.5 -6% | 33.01 -92% | 397.4 -3% |
| Write 512 | 316.5 | 356.3 13% | 51.2 -84% | 242 -24% |
| Read 4k | 36.01 | 27.05 -25% | 0.373 -99% | 19.88 -45% |
| Write 4k | 106.7 | 63.7 -40% | 1.097 -99% | 86.7 -19% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 384.8 | 281.5 -27% | 1.029 -100% | 275.3 -28% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 237.3 | 232 -2% | 1.055 -100% | 197.6 -17% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2267 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 29.9 | 18.3 | 13.7 | 5.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 72.2 | 40.8 | 32.2 | 9.8 |
| Sims 4 (2014) | 137.5 | 49.9 | 21.7 | 18.6 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 33.3 | 20.9 | 11.1 | 7.3 |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 50.1 | 37.6 | 18 | 14.7 |
| F1 2014 (2014) | 100 | 75 | 44 | 25 |
| GTA V (2015) | 50.5 | 45.2 | 10.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.7 | 13.4 | 6.7 | |
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 43.9 | 30.2 | 12.4 | |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 43.3 | 23.6 | 12.3 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 36.2 | 24.4 | 11.1 | |
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 28 | 20.6 | 10.6 | |
| Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 26.6 | 23 | 14.1 | |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 14.7 | 5.1 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 23.3 | 13.3 | 7.9 | |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 27.7 | 19.6 | 7.9 | |
| No Man's Sky (2016) | 19.8 | 15.7 | 8.6 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 14.5 | 10.6 | 5.4 | |
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 83.8 | 70.3 | 36.1 | 34.1 |
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 11.7 | 7.4 | 3.8 | |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 30 | 20.6 | 10.1 | |
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 95.8 | 62.6 | 24 | 10 |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 40.8 | 30.6 | 12.5 | |
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 29.1 | 26.1 | 14.7 |
| Star Wars Battlefront - 1024x768 Low Preset | |
| HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
| F1 2014 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Asus F555LJ-XX110H | |
| GTA V - 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 31 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38 / 38.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.15 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.35 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.8 / 8.4 Watt |
| Carga |
37 / 46 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Pro
Contra
El convertible Lenovo de 15.6" trae un procesador Kaby Lake a la última que ofrece suficiente potencia de cálculo para todo tipo de usos. La GPU Radeon permite jugar limitadamente. La justificación de la GPU dedicada es dudosa ya que no es particularmente potente y puede ser un mero truco. La GPU integrada lo habría hecho igual de bien. Lo que es más, la GPU Nvidia rival ofrece claramente más rendimiento de juego por el mismo precio, en este caso casi 800 Euros.
En general, el portátil va a diario en silencio y no se calienta demasiado. El SSD garantiza un sistema rápido. Puedes configurar un modelo con más capacidad de disco, pero esto implica cambiarlo tú mismo sacando el panel inferior, ya que no hay escotilla de mantenimiento. El teclado chcilet es suficiente. El aguante de la batería es adecuado. El display Full HD IPS integrado nos agrada con su alto contraste, decentes ángulos de visión, y una reprocucción normal del color. Por desgracia, el brillo del display es demasiado bajo.
Lenovo ofrece un sólido convertible 2-en-1 de 15.6" en el Yoga 510-15IKB, si bien no está libre de defectos.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
- 11/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
