Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 300.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1254:1 (Negro: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Sharp LQ133Z1, IPS, 13.3", 3200x1800 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV LGD04D4, , 15.6", 3840x2160 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 0% | 33% | -0% | -25% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 67.9 4% | 64.4 -1% | 89.7 38% | 63 -3% | 47.11 -28% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.8 | 88.2 -3% | 92.9 2% | 100 10% | 94.4 4% | 70.4 -22% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 64.4 -2% | 66.1 0% | 100 52% | 64.8 -2% | 48.71 -26% | |
| Response Times | -64% | -34% | -79% | 2% | -28% | -50% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.6 ? | 44 ? -49% | 48 ? -62% | 57.2 ? -93% | 30.4 ? -3% | 38.8 ? -31% | 58.8 ? -99% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 38.8 ? -47% | 28 ? -6% | 39.2 ? -48% | 24.8 ? 6% | 33.6 ? -27% | 36 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 1000 ? -96% | 962 -96% | 19230 ? -25% | 21550 ? -16% | ||
| Screen | 18% | 21% | 6% | -12% | -32% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 300.9 | 351.5 17% | 348 16% | 370.1 23% | 259 -14% | 255.9 -15% | 239 -21% |
| Brightness | 285 | 336 18% | 306 7% | 356 25% | 255 -11% | 249 -13% | 244 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 83 -10% | 78 -15% | 87 -5% | 87 -5% | 90 -2% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.24 -0% | 0.2 17% | 0.37 -54% | 0.51 -113% | 0.48 -100% | 0.35 -46% |
| Contrast | 1254 | 1465 17% | 1740 39% | 1000 -20% | 508 -59% | 533 -57% | 683 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 3.3 34% | 2.79 44% | 5.3 -6% | 3.9 22% | 5.9 -18% | 7.3 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.2 | 7.3 28% | 5.53 46% | 9.9 3% | 6.9 32% | 18.9 -85% | 24.7 -142% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7 | 1.9 73% | 3.47 50% | 4.6 34% | 4.5 36% | 5.6 20% | 4.9 30% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.09 105% | 2.54 87% | 2.31 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6578 99% | 6784 96% | 6564 99% | 6284 103% | 7257 90% | 7250 90% | 7332 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 64.4 9% | 60 2% | 88.3 50% | 59.5 1% | 44.8 -24% | 35 -41% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 88.2 -2% | 93 3% | 100 11% | 70.1 -22% | 55 -39% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -15% /
-1% | -4% /
9% | -13% /
-5% | -3% /
-8% | -28% /
-30% | -44% /
-40% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 62 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 29.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 25510 Hz | ≤ 69 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 25510 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 69 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 25510 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3670 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4698 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4771 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -13% | -45% | -1% | -35% | -31% | -2% | |
| Read Seq | 2046 | 1266 -38% | 1159 -43% | 1684 -18% | 1115 -46% | 1518 -26% | 2170 6% |
| Write Seq | 1213 | 982 -19% | 324.1 -73% | 1106 -9% | 311 -74% | 798 -34% | 1202 -1% |
| Read 512 | 1242 | 834 -33% | 528 -57% | 977 -21% | 706 -43% | 460.5 -63% | 786 -37% |
| Write 512 | 799 | 714 -11% | 373.7 -53% | 1119 40% | 472.3 -41% | 195.8 -75% | 822 3% |
| Read 4k | 58.1 | 40.72 -30% | 29.26 -50% | 45.14 -22% | 31.97 -45% | 47.16 -19% | 58.9 1% |
| Write 4k | 146.2 | 139.4 -5% | 108.3 -26% | 134.1 -8% | 135.1 -8% | 143.1 -2% | 146.4 0% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 415.1 | 527 27% | 335.9 -19% | 509 23% | 288.3 -31% | 521 26% | 457.7 10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 369.2 | 395.2 7% | 234.1 -37% | 398.1 8% | 405.5 10% | 176.4 -52% | 392.9 6% |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 54150 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17421 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5278 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2595 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 43 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 40 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 23 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 32 | |||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 26 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 48 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 39 / 46.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | -9% | -6% | -3% | -6% | ||
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.4 -1% | 28.9 -2% | 28.1 -0% | 27.7 2% | 28.5 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 32.3 -15% | 28.1 -0% | 30.5 -8% | 28.5 -1% | |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 32.3 -15% | 29.1 -3% | 30.5 -8% | 28.5 -1% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 32.2 -14% | 32.3 -15% | 29.1 -3% | 30.6 -9% | 36.3 -29% | |
| Load Average * | 39 | 47.1 -21% | 43.2 -11% | 49.2 -26% | 40 -3% | 42.7 -9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 46.3 | 47.1 -2% | 45.2 2% | 49.2 -6% | 42.6 8% | 42.7 8% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 40 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.3 °C / -9.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8.3 / 10.2 / 10.4 Watt |
| Carga |
67.5 / 117.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | -38% | -30% | 1% | -1% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8.3 | 8.2 1% | 11.9 -43% | 11.4 -37% | 6.7 19% | 8.5 -2% | 8.14 2% |
| Idle Average * | 10.2 | 10.8 -6% | 17.1 -68% | 14.3 -40% | 8.9 13% | 9.1 11% | 10.91 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 12.7 -22% | 17.3 -66% | 14.3 -38% | 10.8 -4% | 9.7 7% | 12.26 -18% |
| Load Average * | 67.5 | 22.6 67% | 94.7 -40% | 82.7 -23% | 81.8 -21% | 79.9 -18% | 45.67 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.5 | 104.8 -9% | 92.2 4% | 97.7 -1% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 117.2 | 24.6 79% | 122 -4% | 131.1 -12% | 122.7 -5% | 121.5 -4% | 74.94 36% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -15% | -8% | -33% | -37% | -51% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1066 | 831 -22% | 552 -48% | 612 -43% | 509 -52% | 866 -19% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 484 | 410 -15% | 434 -10% | 270 -44% | 263 -46% | 240 -50% | 535 11% |
| Load | 96 | 103 7% | 88 -8% | 76 -21% | 46 -52% | 148 54% |
Pro
Contra
El Lenovo Yoga 15 puede describirse adecuadamente como "aprendiz de mucho, maestro de nada". Abarca varias categorías de portátiles diferentes y lo hace bien en todas, pero en general hace sacrificios para acomodar un abanico de escenarios tan grande. Es un convertible con madera gaming, un portátil multimedia con diseño 2-en-1, y un portátil gaming básico portable bien construido. Con potencial para tantos casos de uso diferentes es difícil encontrar una cosa que el Yoga 720 haga excepcionalmente bien.
El chasis tiene una construcción exquisita y parece discreto y elegante. El teclado es genial para el usuario casual y para el mecanógrafo. La pantalla tiene un perfil de color homogéneo que mejora mucho con los calibrados. La inclusión de una CPU quad-core y una dGPU son añadidos bienvenidos respecto a los componentes de baja potencia que suelen encontrarse en los 2-en-1s.
Pero la selección de puertos es magra. El teclado no tiene nada sobresaliente. La pantalla es muy reflectante, lo que es problemático con la iluminación errónea. Y la CPU se ralentiza mucho para mantener temperaturas razonables.
En general, el Lenovo Yoga 720 es un portátil decente para "hacerlo todo". Es un dispositivo versátil y muy capaz, que llena el hueco entre convertible, multimedia, y gaming de gama baja. Si bien hay portátiles que superan al Yoga 720 en cada una de las respectivas categorías, es una buena opción para quien busque un "todoterreno" con varios estilos diferentes en un paquete.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
- 06/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
