Breve análisis del Sager NP5852 (Clevo N850HL, i7-7700HQ, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 303.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 691:1 (Negro: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.19% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Sager NP5852 ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 66% | 0% | 60% | 56% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.19 | 38.97 2% | 65.7 72% | 38.3 0% | 64.9 70% | 63.3 66% |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.8 | 58.2 2% | 90.3 59% | 57.6 1% | 85.9 51% | 83.6 47% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.58 | 40.3 2% | 65.9 66% | 39.57 0% | 62.8 59% | 61.1 54% |
| Response Times | 0% | 1% | -16% | -8% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.6 ? | 32 ? -8% | 38.8 ? -31% | 41 ? -39% | 38 ? -28% | 38 ? -28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 25.6 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 3% | 26 ? 7% | 28 ? -0% | 29 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 20000 ? 0% | 25910 ? 30% | 21000 ? 5% | 21000 ? 5% | |
| Screen | 2% | 37% | 27% | 32% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 303.9 | 248.4 -18% | 335 10% | 235 -23% | 284 -7% | 276 -9% |
| Brightness | 286 | 241 -16% | 313 9% | 236 -17% | 276 -3% | 283 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 84 -5% | 83 -6% | 80 -9% | 82 -7% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.3 32% | 0.27 39% | 0.17 61% | 0.295 33% | 0.27 39% |
| Contrast | 691 | 828 20% | 1241 80% | 1382 100% | 963 39% | 1022 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 7.5 -3% | 4.7 36% | 4.69 36% | 4.07 44% | 3.92 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 27.3 | 25.2 8% | 8.1 70% | 7.9 71% | 10.52 61% | 9.13 67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 6.5 2% | 5.8 12% | 3.34 49% | 3.13 53% | 2.6 61% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.06 107% | 2.63 84% | 2.41 91% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 7652 85% | 7852 83% | 6518 100% | 6801 96% | 7082 92% | 6561 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.4 | 37 2% | 58.7 61% | 36 -1% | 56 54% | 54.5 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.5 | 57.9 2% | 90.1 59% | 57 1% | 86 52% | 83.7 48% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 1% /
2% | 35% /
36% | 4% /
16% | 28% /
30% | 27% /
30% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 29.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 36 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 20000 Hz | ≤ 99 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Score | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3742 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4741 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5011 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3939 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Sager NP5852 Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B | Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -14% | 215% | -60% | 11% | -34% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 263.6 | 323.5 23% | 889 237% | 214.6 -19% | 410.4 56% | 168.2 -36% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 191.1 | 195.3 2% | 336.4 76% | 71.1 -63% | 266.9 40% | 123.4 -35% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 337.5 | 446.8 32% | 1678 397% | 296.7 -12% | 491.5 46% | 266.9 -21% |
| Score Total | 1027 | 752 -27% | 3731 263% | 1043 2% | 982 -4% | 977 -5% |
| Score Write | 335 | 234 -30% | 1158 246% | 405 21% | 400 19% | 316 -6% |
| Score Read | 453 | 337 -26% | 1727 281% | 414 -9% | 379 -16% | 442 -2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.054 | 0.073 -35% | 0.028 48% | 0.42 -678% | 0.067 -24% | 0.224 -315% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.092 | 0.141 -53% | 0.031 66% | 0.191 -108% | 0.068 26% | 0.084 9% |
| 4K-64 Write | 231.4 | 132.2 -43% | 870 276% | 309.5 34% | 293.5 27% | 233.6 1% |
| 4K-64 Read | 372.9 | 257 -31% | 1430 283% | 328.4 -12% | 301.6 -19% | 364.5 -2% |
| 4K Write | 57.5 | 53.8 -6% | 133.2 132% | 52.5 -9% | 58 1% | 63.5 10% |
| 4K Read | 30.12 | 28.3 -6% | 54 79% | 38.73 29% | 27.05 -10% | 27.19 -10% |
| Seq Write | 457.1 | 479.8 5% | 1540 237% | 425 -7% | 488.7 7% | 190.8 -58% |
| Seq Read | 497.6 | 516 4% | 2429 388% | 471.7 -5% | 501 1% | 502 1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4906 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72119 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15501 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3353 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1709 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 95.2 | 51 | 21.2 | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 66 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 202.9 | 113.8 | 95.4 | 34.9 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 97.4 | 84.6 | 49.8 | 25.6 |
| Thief (2014) | 79.2 | 51.9 | 44.1 | 23.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69 | 42 | 23.5 | 12.6 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 57 | 49 | 22 | 8 |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 45.8 | 25 | 19.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 78.4 | 44.6 | 24.5 | 19.2 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 35.1 | 20.7 | 17.1 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 168 | 54.4 | 34.4 | |
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 31.2 | 21.9 | 14 | |
| Prey (2017) | 50.6 | 40 | 34 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 52.9 | 39 | 23.7 | |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 83 | 41 | 32 | 20 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 28.7 / 29.3 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 53.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Sager NP5852 GeForce MX150, i7-7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 3% | 0% | 4% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% | 30.1 -6% | 30 -6% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 33 -15% | 29.4 -2% | 30.1 -5% | 30 -5% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.7 | 33.3 -16% | 29.9 -4% | 30.2 -5% | 30 -5% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 34.7 -18% | 29.9 -2% | 30.5 -4% | 30 -2% | 30.3 -3% |
| Load Average * | 41.6 | 44.5 -7% | 38.3 8% | 41.1 1% | 37.3 10% | 35.4 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 | 49.2 -24% | 39.8 -0% | 40.4 -2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 53.7 | 52.8 2% | 39.6 26% | 41.2 23% | 38 29% | 37.2 31% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.9 °C / -10.6 F).
Sager NP5852 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (18% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (19.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.24 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9.2 / 11.2 / 11.3 Watt |
| Carga |
71.3 / 80.1 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sager NP5852 i7-7700HQ, GeForce MX150, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | 35% | 29% | -5% | -24% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.2 | 8 13% | 2.9 68% | 3.9 58% | 7 24% | 8.3 10% | 3.8 59% |
| Idle Average * | 11.2 | 10.9 3% | 5.9 47% | 7.9 29% | 10.9 3% | 14.8 -32% | 6.5 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 11 3% | 6.4 43% | 11.3 -0% | 12.9 -14% | 16.8 -49% | 7.2 36% |
| Load Average * | 71.3 | 76.7 -8% | 54 24% | 47 34% | 72 -1% | 71 -0% | 62.5 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.8 | 94.9 -73% | 51 7% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 80.1 | 106.4 -33% | 66 18% | 62 23% | 109 -36% | 119.2 -49% | 99.6 -24% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Sager NP5852 i7-7700HQ, GeForce MX150, 62 Wh | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 55 Wh | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -21% | 41% | 72% | 44% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 498 | 493 -1% | 1061 113% | 1253 152% | 429 -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 261 -26% | 535 52% | 517 47% | 506 44% | 268 -24% |
| Load | 121 | 77 -36% | 70 -42% | 142 17% | 87 -28% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 68 |
Pro
Contra
Respecto al rendimiento, el potencial gaming de la MX150 es impresionante visto que consume un 40% menos energía que el Sabre 15 (GTX 1050) jugando, siendo un 40 - 45% más lento. Tanto las temperaturas como el ruido de ventilador son bastante menores, lo que ofrece una experiencia gaming respetable entre tarea y tarea de clase. Es realmente sorprendente ver un rendimiento a la par con portátiles GTX 860M o GTX 950M por parte de una GPU Pascal básica.
Nuestras quejas principales con el NP5852 no son tanto con su rendimiento sino con su precio y su chasis. Primero, el precio inicial de $800 se acerca bastante al del Sabre 15, Samsung Odyssey, o Pavilion 15 Power con gráfica GTX 1050 más veloz. Los compradores potenciales sóno tendrán que invertir unos $100 - $200 más para obtener un enorme aumento en potencia GPU si los juegos son una prioridad. En segundo lugar, el chasis es más bien grande para la GPU básica MX150. Las mencionadas alternativas no son mucho más grandes o gruesas que nuestro Sager y por ello un chasis más pequeño estilo Ultrabook habría sido más adecuado para la MX150. Emparejar la MX150 con un Intel clase U definitivamente resultará en un rendimiento gaming ligeramente inferior como han mostrado nuestras comparaciones frente al Aspire 5 A515, pero el extremo ahorro en peso y portabilidad seguramente superará las desventajas para la mayoría de jugones.
El Sager NP5852 es una máquina gaming casual de vuelta a clase genial. Espera, empero, un par de mesxes y el mercado de portátiles estará saturado con diseños más delgados y ligeros con la misma GPU MX150. El NP5852 sólo es recomendable si los precios caen por debajo de la actual cosecha de portátiles GTX 1050 asequibles.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Sager NP5852
- 09/21/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
