Breve análisis del Schenker Media 15 (i7-7700HQ, MX150)
Anschlussausstattung
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 321 cd/m²
Contraste: 849:1 (Negro: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.05 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| SCHENKER Media 15 LG Philips LP156WF6, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 1% | 37% | 40% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 66.6 3% | 66.3 3% | 97.9 52% | 89.7 39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84 | 86.9 3% | 84.2 0% | 99.9 19% | 100 19% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.4 | 63.5 3% | 61.6 0% | 85.9 40% | 100 63% |
| Response Times | -38% | 162% | 147% | -65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 41.2 ? -21% | 41 ? -21% | 48 ? -41% | 57.2 ? -68% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 29.6 ? 1% | 31 ? -3% | 33.8 ? -13% | 39.2 ? -31% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 | 1000 -95% | 122000 ? 510% | 119000 ? 495% | 962 -95% |
| Screen | 3% | 15% | 41% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 314 | 338.7 8% | 397 26% | 545 74% | 370.1 18% |
| Brightness | 321 | 325 1% | 364 13% | 523 63% | 356 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 84 -9% | 86 -7% | 87 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.28 24% | 0.29 22% | 0.44 -19% | 0.37 -0% |
| Contrast | 849 | 1210 43% | 1369 61% | 1239 46% | 1000 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.69 | 4.9 -4% | 3.88 17% | 1.6 66% | 5.3 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.64 | 8.7 18% | 8.22 23% | 3.8 64% | 9.9 7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.05 | 5.5 -80% | 3.1 -2% | 1.9 38% | 4.6 -51% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.08 106% | 2.59 85% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6684 97% | 7498 87% | 6570 99% | 6834 95% | 6284 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 63.5 15% | 55 0% | 88.3 61% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 86.92 3% | 84 0% | 100 19% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -11% /
-5% | 59% /
40% | 75% /
63% | -6% /
-1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 20000 Hz |  | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) . La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4009 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5123 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| SCHENKER Media 15 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Apple SSD SM0256L | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -8% | -63% | -29% | -18% | |
| Read Seq | 2175 | 1248 -43% | 480.1 -78% | 1557 -28% | 1684 -23% |
| Write Seq | 1769 | 1476 -17% | 385.6 -78% | 1505 -15% | 1106 -37% |
| Read 512 | 1000 | 849 -15% | 295.6 -70% | 968 -3% | 977 -2% |
| Write 512 | 1543 | 1118 -28% | 302.5 -80% | 1124 -27% | 1119 -27% |
| Read 4k | 53.5 | 58.8 10% | 27.58 -48% | 10.76 -80% | 45.14 -16% |
| Write 4k | 153.4 | 155.2 1% | 81.4 -47% | 12.87 -92% | 134.1 -13% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 554 | 645 16% | 247.4 -55% | 631 14% | 509 -8% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 489 | 547 12% | 237.7 -51% | 468.4 -4% | 398.1 -19% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4925 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15777 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3320 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| SCHENKER Media 15 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 76.1 | 43.8 | 24.6 | 21.2 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 42.5 / 51.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
SCHENKER Media 15 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.8 / 8.6 / 10.8 Watt |
| Carga |
75 / 88 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
Con el Media 15, Schenker ofrece un sólido portátil multimedia. Sobre el papel el hardware del dispositivo pinta bien, y los resultados de nuestras pruebas confirman que el portátil ofrece un rendimiento genial. Sin embargo, es importante que los posibles compradores elijan los componentes hardware con cuidado para no acabar con un dispositivo desequilibrado. No obstante, hay algunos defectos que los compradores deberían tener en cuenta. La calidad del sonido es malísima y el aguante de batería es inferior a la media, aunque el display es buenísimo.
El Schenker Media 15 es un portátil multimedia sólido que ofrece muchas opciones de personalización de hardware, a través de las cuales los compradores pueden personalizar sus dispositivos ampliamente antes de comprarlo.
A lo largo de nuestro análisis, el Media 15 se colgó dos veces sin motivo aparente, y las altas temperaturas de CPU que medimos durante el test de estrés podrían tener implicaciones serias para la longevidad del dispositivo. No obstante, el Media 15 merece tenerse en cuenta para los compradores preocupados con el precio. Streaming de vídeo, edición de imagen, y aplicaciones 3D no son un problema para este dispositivo. Sin embargo, al jugar a videojuegos exigentes, habría que dar un descanso al dispositivo de vez en cuando para asegurarse de que las temperaturas CPU no se mantienen demasiado altas demasiado tiempo.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
SCHENKER Media 15
- 02/20/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
