Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)

Jugón compacto. El 14" de Schenker ejecuta todos los juegos fluidamente en su display mate IPS. Las características también son buenas, con una combinación de SSD NVMe y HDD, 16 GB de RAM, y un buen teclado a bordo. También se puede instalar un módem LTE/UMTS si fuera necesario.
SCHENKER XMG P407
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit, ForceWare 378.49, Optimus
Memoría
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, dos ranuras (ocupadas), max. 32 GB
pantalla
14.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, 60 Hz, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD @ 5400 rpm. ranuras: 1x M.2-type 2280 & 1x 2.5"
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: clavija auriculares, entrada micrófono, S/PDIF, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, ranura SIM
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 25 x 349 x 247
Battería
45 Wh Litio-Ion, 3 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente: 120 W, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.118 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 460 g
Precio
1569 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.4 kg349 mm 247 mm 25 mm 2.1 kg349 mm 247 mm 25 mm 2.2 kg345 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg340 mm 239 mm 20.9 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P406
 
76 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
 
76 MB/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
 
26 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG P407
 
87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG P406
 
86 MB/s -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
 
27.7 MB/s -68%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
561 MBit/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
439 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
312 MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
513 MBit/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
347 MBit/s -28%
278
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 281.6 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
iluminación: 80 %
Brillo con batería: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Negro: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.11 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
SCHENKER XMG P407
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14"
SCHENKER XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080, 14"
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14"
Gigabyte P34W v5
2560x1440, 14"
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
2%
2%
-13%
31%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
66.2
3%
65.2
1%
51.4
-20%
85.4
32%
sRGB Coverage
82.1
82.8
1%
83.4
2%
76.6
-7%
100
22%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
60
60.5
1%
60.9
2%
52.8
-12%
83.8
40%
Response Times
-15%
2%
9%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 ?(14, 33)
56 ?(22, 34)
-19%
47 ?(14, 33)
-0%
41.2 ?(15.2, 26)
12%
44 ?(24, 20)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(5, 22)
30 ?(8, 22)
-11%
26 ?(6, 20)
4%
25.4 ?(3.4, 22)
6%
29 ?(12, 17)
-7%
PWM Frequency
198 ?(90)
Screen
-1%
-1%
3%
-50%
Brightness middle
298
282
-5%
272
-9%
277.8
-7%
258
-13%
Brightness
282
266
-6%
277
-2%
270
-4%
234
-17%
Brightness Distribution
80
81
1%
84
5%
83
4%
79
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.22
19%
0.26
4%
0.38
-41%
0.54
-100%
Contrast
1104
1282
16%
1046
-5%
731
-34%
478
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.42
4.98
-13%
4.59
-4%
2.71
39%
9.74
-120%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.57
10.2
-19%
8.49
1%
5.47
36%
14.6
-70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.11
4.08
1%
4.28
-4%
2.11
49%
11.59
-182%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.51 88%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
6329 103%
5877 111%
6848 95%
6314 103%
11851 55%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
54
0%
55
2%
48.5
-10%
76
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
83
1%
83
1%
76.9
-6%
100
22%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-5% / -2%
1% / -0%
-0% / 0%
-7% / -27%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 5 ms subida
↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 33 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 79 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5472
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22216
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5742
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
64.1 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
738 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
137 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points -8%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.5 Points -7%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.49 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points -8%
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.65 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.6 Points -4%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22216 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21976 Points -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20394 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20195 Points -9%
Rendering Single 32Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5742 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5568 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5460 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5348 Points -7%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3558 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3542 Points 0%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3256 Points -8%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13693 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13346 Points -3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12873 Points -6%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4326 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4321 Points
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4119 Points -5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14026 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
13058 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12448 Points -11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
252.1 Points +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
247.3 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247.2 Points
PCMark 7 Score
6266 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4069 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5146 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5234 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4069 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
4010 Points -1%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3899 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3706 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
5234 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points -4%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
4920 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4831 Points -8%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4649 Points -11%
PCMark 7 - Score
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
6266 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
6242 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
6147 Points -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5874 Points -6%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3818 Points -39%
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1345 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1502 MB/s
512K Read: 320.3 MB/s
512K Write: 1276 MB/s
4K Read: 58.9 MB/s
4K Write: 171 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 539 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG P407
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
SCHENKER XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
 
Gigabyte P34W v5
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
14%
20%
31%
-96%
Read Seq
1345
1634
21%
1977
47%
2269
69%
112.4
-92%
Write Seq
1502
1290
-14%
1668
11%
1524
1%
107.3
-93%
Read 512
320.3
1149
259%
800
150%
937
193%
43.19
-87%
Write 512
1276
1285
1%
1030
-19%
1483
16%
57
-96%
Read 4k
58.9
43.82
-26%
58.1
-1%
53.8
-9%
0.494
-99%
Write 4k
171
110.3
-35%
145.6
-15%
167.3
-2%
1.122
-99%
Read 4k QD32
625
320.5
-49%
592
-5%
622
0%
1.088
-100%
Write 4k QD32
539
287.3
-47%
508
-6%
418.9
-22%
1.234
-100%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
26084 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
9921 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
83626 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22393 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7194 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3766 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2659 puntos
ayuda
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
78820 Points +46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
61281 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
53978 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51975 Points -4%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
51225 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
49539 Points -8%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
39824 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11622 Points +39%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
10791 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8376 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7646 Points -9%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7457 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points -11%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
6382 Points -24%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15387 Points +48%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
13534 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10402 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9725 Points -7%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9691 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
8223 Points -21%
bajomedioaltoultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 360.1 258.1 199.2 98.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 168.9 159.2 152.2 76.4
Battlefield 4 (2013) 178.6 174.9 145.7 71
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 63.2 45.6 40.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 99 74.7 39.8 20.3
Battlefield 1 (2016) 142.1 122.1 62.4 56.3
Civilization VI (2016) 70.2 50.1 41.8 42.4
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.7 136.5 68.5 58.6
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
102.3 fps +34%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
76.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.8 fps -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
71.4 fps -7%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
66.2 fps -13%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
144.9 fps +47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
131.7 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
98.9 fps
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
87.4 fps -12%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
80.6 fps -19%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
99.8 fps +41%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
71 fps
SCHENKER XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
58.1 fps -18%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
52 fps -27%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
56.3 fps
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
51.2 fps -9%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
44.4 fps -21%
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
57.4 fps +42%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
49.4 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
40.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
29.1 fps -28%
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
78.5 fps +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
66.7 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
58.6 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
45.5 fps -22%
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
42.4 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
34.1 fps -20%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
52.4 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
39.8 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
32.2 fps -19%

Ruido

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 36 dB(A)
HDD
32 dB(A)
Carga
43 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Noise
-5%
-9%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29
31
-7%
30.6
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
35
-13%
31.6
-2%
32.5
-5%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
36
-13%
31.6
1%
32.5
-2%
Idle Maximum *
36
40
-11%
37
-3%
32.5
10%
32.5
10%
Load Average *
43
47
-9%
43
-0%
46.5
-8%
36.4
15%
Load Maximum *
48
51
-6%
57
-19%
52.5
-9%
52.4
-9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 43.6 °C48.7 °C46 °C 
 43.6 °C49 °C45.7 °C 
 34.7 °C36.4 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.6 °C
44.7 °C43.8 °C44 °C
40.9 °C50.8 °C48.6 °C
30.1 °C31.9 °C31.6 °C
Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C
Conector de corriente  49 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Heat
-35%
-6%
-18%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
55
-12%
54
-10%
59.3
-21%
44.9
8%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
58.7
-16%
49.4
3%
56.5
-11%
38.2
25%
Idle Upper Side *
26.3
36.9
-40%
28
-6%
27.8
-6%
27.4
-4%
Idle Bottom *
24.1
41.7
-73%
26.8
-11%
31.8
-32%
29
-20%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.540.82539.236.13129.6314036.537.35027.228.46327.827.38027.429.910027.228.712522.928.316021.736.420022.650.625021.754.131519.855.940018.758.250018.161.36301867.680017.370.9100016.867.7125016.963.7160017.160.2200017.168.3250017.167.8315017.166.2400017.563.6500017.461.6630017.466.5800017.367.71000017.363.81250017.457.4160001751.5SPL29.778.2N1.342.9median 17.4median 61.6Delta0.98.229.834.234.541.330.937.32833.925.431.125.927.723.831.823.740.72347.623.253.622.355.620.954.419.762.119.16219.362.919.664.120.370.419.370.119.269.52067.41969.718.968.718.96418.764.318.763.318.864.318.956.7195518.950.718.743.431.378.81.543.8median 19.2median 62.91.16.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG P407Razer Blade (2016) FHD
SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 24 Watt
Carga midlight 82 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Power Consumption
-13%
-10%
3%
Idle Minimum *
10
12
-20%
14
-40%
10.6
-6%
Idle Average *
15
16
-7%
18
-20%
14.5
3%
Idle Maximum *
24
22
8%
21
12%
15
37%
Load Average *
82
90
-10%
70
15%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
124
170
-37%
146
-18%
135
-9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
4h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 33min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 32min
SCHENKER XMG P407
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh
SCHENKER XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh
Duración de Batería
-26%
40%
-22%
-18%
Reader / Idle
443
275
-38%
760
72%
392
-12%
387
-13%
H.264
213
312
46%
217
2%
WiFi v1.3
241
197
-18%
427
77%
232
-4%
225
-7%
Load
92
72
-22%
59
-36%
47
-49%
41
-55%

Pro

+ sólida carcasa bien fabricada
+ ampliamente configurable
+ dispositivos de entrada buenísimos
+ display mate IPS
+ muchos puertos
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- uso del turbo y aguante de batería mejorables
- display con tiempos de respuesta lentos
- bajo rendimiento en batería
- sin Thunderbolt 3
XMG P407. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Schenker Technologies
XMG P407. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Schenker Technologies

On the outside, the XMG P407 is not different from its predecessor. That is why we shall focus on the new features, which are found primarily on the inside. The new Kaby Lake processor provides a slight performance increase. The fresh CPU also has a good, though modest, impact on battery life. The built-in GeForce GTX 1050 Ti core is in the upper middle range of Nvidia's current line-up, but it offers more performance than many top-range models of the previous generation. In other words: The GeForce GTX 970M chip built into the XMG P406 loses in 3DMark benchmarks as well as in real-world gaming.

The heat development under load can be described as moderate: The XMG P407 does not become as warm as its predecessor. The differences between the P406 and the P407 in terms of system noise are small. However, we notice some improvement: The CPU fan in the P406 likes to speed up unexpectedly and is then clearly perceptible. This behavior is apparently not present in the P407. The ports bear further updates: One of the four USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 ports makes way for a USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2 port. In addition, one of the two Mini DisplayPorts is now equipped with the 1.4 standard.

With the XMG P407, Schenker delivers a well-rounded 14-inch gaming notebook.

A lightning-quick NVMe SSD ensures a snappy system. The required storage space is provided by a 2.5-inch hard drive. Both drives can be exchanged, since the bottom plate of the base unit can be removed effortlessly. A good keyboard is also in the package. The matte IPS display has pleasantly wide viewing angles and good contrast. However, the display could offer more in terms of brightness. The switching times of the built-in display are only slightly better than those of the XMG P406.

SCHENKER XMG P407 - 03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
83%
Ratón
86%
Conectividad
66 / 81 → 82%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battería
73%
Pantalla
86%
Rendimiento de juegos
90%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
94%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruido
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
71%
Cámara
52 / 85 → 61%
Médio
77%
85%
Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-03-23 (Update: 2017-03-23)