Breve análisis del Schenker XMG U727 (Clevo P870DM3-G)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
|
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 1125:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
SCHENKER XMG U727 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | MSI GT80S 6QF Samsung 184HL (SDC4C48), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG U726 AU B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | -0% | -3% | -25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 86.9 | 65.5 -25% | 87 0% | 91.2 5% | 66.9 -23% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 89.2 -11% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 85.2 -15% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.5 | 65.2 -34% | 98.9 -1% | 84.9 -15% | 62.3 -37% |
Response Times | 14% | 53% | 6% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 35 ? 10% | 26 ? 33% | 38 ? 3% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 20 ? 17% | 6.8 ? 72% | 22 ? 8% | |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | ||||
Screen | -6% | -1% | -43% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 360 | 298 -17% | 330 -8% | 314 -13% | 328 -9% |
Brightness | 328 | 265 -19% | 327 0% | 294 -10% | 317 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 78 -10% | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 88 1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.35 -9% | 0.38 -19% | 0.23 28% | 0.3 6% |
Contrast | 1125 | 851 -24% | 868 -23% | 1365 21% | 1093 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 2.72 31% | 3 24% | 9.74 -147% | 3.74 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.01 | 5.4 10% | 5.3 12% | 15.71 -161% | 8.97 -49% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.13 | 3 27% | 3.81 8% | 9.58 -132% | 2.67 35% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.52 87% | 2.5 88% | 2.41 91% |
CCT | 6533 99% | 6995 93% | 6306 103% | 11854 55% | 6861 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 58 -34% | 88 0% | 76 -14% | 56 -36% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 89 -11% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 85 -15% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -5% /
-7% | -1% /
-1% | 2% /
-22% | -9% /
-9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 4 ms subida | |
↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida | |
↘ 25 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
PCMark 7 Score | 6605 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4507 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4662 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 |
SCHENKER XMG U727 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GT80S 6QF 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG U726 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 22% | -16% | 27% | -15% | |
Read Seq | 2257 | 3259 44% | 1661 -26% | 3285 46% | 1718 -24% |
Write Seq | 1499 | 2556 71% | 1560 4% | 2560 71% | 1305 -13% |
Read 4k | 53.6 | 49.38 -8% | 45.42 -15% | 52.2 -3% | 44.42 -17% |
Write 4k | 164.9 | 130.3 -21% | 121.5 -26% | 153.1 -7% | 154.4 -6% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 24547 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21423 puntos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9768 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
MSI GT80S 6QF | |
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 80.2 | 79.2 | 72.3 | ||
XCOM 2 (2016) | 96 | 85.4 | 57.4 | ||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 76 | 75 | 73 | ||
The Division (2016) | 133 | 122 | 70.1 | ||
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 106 | 89.5 | 87.8 | ||
Doom (2016) | 147 | 141 | 83.2 | ||
Overwatch (2016) | 294 | 291 | 211 | ||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 115 | 112 | 65.5 |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Overwatch - 3840x2160 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Doom - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Need for Speed 2016 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
The Division - 3840x2160 High Preset AF:8x | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Far Cry Primal - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:SM | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
XCOM 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
SCHENKER XMG U727 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype | |
Asus G800VI Prototype | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus GX800 Prototype |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 33 / 35 / 40 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 44 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG U727 GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT80S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 7% | 8% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 34 -3% | 33 -0% | 32 3% | 31 6% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 36 -3% | 34 3% | 33 6% | 32 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 40 -0% | 35 12% | 35 12% | 33 17% |
Load Average * | 44 | 51 -16% | 42 5% | 35 20% | 40 9% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 60 -13% | 46 13% | 49 8% | 47 11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63.7 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 47.5 °C / 117.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-18.6 °C / -33.5 F).
SCHENKER XMG U727 GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT80S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -1% | 12% | 21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 55.8 | 45.7 18% | 46.9 16% | 44.9 20% | 42.9 23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 63.7 | 61 4% | 61 4% | 51.2 20% | 41.5 35% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.7 | 36.4 -5% | 36.3 -5% | 32.7 6% | 31.6 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.7 | 39.2 -13% | 40.8 -18% | 34.2 1% | 29.5 15% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG U727 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus G752VS-XB78K audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 1 / 1.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 43 / 53 / 64 Watt |
Carga |
185 / 490 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER XMG U727 GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT80S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | 22% | 40% | 47% | |
Idle Minimum * | 43 | 44 -2% | 36 16% | 31 28% | 24 44% |
Idle Average * | 53 | 53 -0% | 45 15% | 35 34% | 31 42% |
Idle Maximum * | 64 | 62 3% | 53 17% | 40 37% | 36 44% |
Load Average * | 185 | 163 12% | 139 25% | 106 43% | 94 49% |
Load Maximum * | 490 | 411 16% | 306 38% | 218 56% | 204 58% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG U727 89 Wh | MSI GT80S 6QF 75 Wh | SCHENKER XMG U726 89 Wh | MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 75.2 Wh | Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -16% | 15% | 51% | 61% | |
Reader / Idle | 157 | 148 -6% | 170 8% | 290 85% | 311 98% |
WiFi v1.3 | 118 | 206 75% | 210 78% | ||
Load | 78 | 58 -26% | 94 21% | 72 -8% | 84 8% |
Gaming | 66 | ||||
H.264 | 186 |
Pro
Contra
¿Objeto de impresionante prestigio o un dinero malgastado? Como un coche deportivo de lujo, las posibles respuestas a esta pregunta pueden ser muy diferentes.
Sí, puedes argüir que el XMG U727 es demasiado caro y mejor te compras un PC Y un portátil de juego. Sin embargo, si no quieres un pc de sobremesa y quieres el rendimiento máximo de un portátil, el modelo de pruebas puede merecer la pena.
Además de los puertos, el display 4K (¡88 % AdobeRGB!), las opciones de mejora y el rendimiento son geniales. USB 3.1 Type-C con Thunderbolt 3, gráficas MXM y CPU en zócalo: Schenker Technologies definitivamente ha pensado en el futuro y hace frente a la tendencia de tirar los dispositivos (palabra clave: componentes soldados).
Los compradores potenciales, empero, deberían tener en cuenta que es un sistema estacionario con muy poco aguante de bateŕia. Contando con los dos adaptadores de corriente, el P870DM3-G barebone pesa 8kg. No quisimos cargar con él después de sacar las fotos de exteriores.
Si valoras la calidad del chasis, no hay mucho que criticar. Tanto la calidad de construcción como los dispositivos de entrada son más que decentes. También tiene buenos altavoces y configuraciones individuales. El software que trae también es conveniente. Control Center permite el control manual de ventiladores y rendimiento.
En resumen: El XMG U727 es una opción para jugones adinerados que quieran el rendimiento máximo y les guste experimentar con la tecnología, pero que odien los PCs de sobremesa. Recomendamos un portátil normal con una sola GPU al resto de usuarios.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
SCHENKER XMG U727
-
12/31/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser